GET THE APP

Preserve Food Quality with Nanocomposite Trays
..

Journal of Food & Industrial Microbiology

ISSN: 2572-4134

Open Access

Commentary - (2022) Volume 8, Issue 4

Preserve Food Quality with Nanocomposite Trays

David Fernandez*
*Correspondence: David Fernandez, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Oviedo, Gijón, Spain, Email:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Oviedo, Gijón, Spain

Received: 02-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. jfim-22-71247; Editor assigned: 04-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. P-71247; Reviewed: 18-Jul-2022, QC No. Q-71247; Revised: 23-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. R-71247; Published: 30-Jul-2022 , DOI: 37421/2572-4134.2022.8.251
Citation: Fernandez, David. “Preserve Food Quality with Nanocomposite Trays.” J Food Ind Microbiol 8 (2022): 251.
Copyright: © 2022 Fernandez D. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Description

Food packaging has many beneficial functions, such as meals containment, marketing, protection, and protection for the duration of the shelf lifestyles of a product. In order to accomplish all this, a meals packaging cloth should have sufficient electricity to overcome its filling process, transport, and purchaser handling. At the equal time, it wishes to have the splendid barrier houses for positive applications, such as in modified surroundings packaging (MAP), and, of course, it desires to maintain migration of packaging elements to meals to a minimum, complying with all rules concerning Food Contact Materials (FCM), such as Food and Drug Administration [1].

Due to its low weight and versatility, amongst different things, polymers have been one of the most essential substances used in meals packaging. Plastic packaging performs a key function in defending meals from exterior virus and microorganisms as nicely as assisting prolong shelf existence of packed food. However, it is additionally very essential to preserve migration of plastic factors into food to a minimum, due to the fact that may want to break the product packed. Migration checks are regulated via legislation; thus, the amount of migrants allowed in the meals is targeted by using the world migration limits.

At the equal time, the regulation documents the lists of authorized components to be used in meals contact materials, this is the “positive list”. Each of this substance has its migration restriction specified, in order to keep away from meals toxicity The evaluation carried out for controlling the quantity of every substance in the packaging are referred to as precise migration tests. Fresh merchandise (poultry, fruits, vegetables, etc.) are a automobile for the transmission of bacterial, parasitic, and viral pathogens successful of inflicting human sickness. Within meals packaging applications, enhancing shelf existence of packed hen is a massive task for the industry. Fresh hen meat is especially famous amongst customers and, at the identical time, it is enormously perishable (rapid microbial growth) main to excessive financial losses. Its shelf existence relies upon on the whole on chicken coping with and processing (in the preliminary quantity of microorganisms) or on its storage prerequisites thru all the meals chain [2-4].

One of the most essential meals packaging structures is MAP, the place the meals is packed, collectively with a positive combination of gases that will preserve freshness of the food, bettering preservation, and extending shelf life. MPA requires a tray or base container and a lid to seal the packaged content. There are many plastic substances that ought to be used for this application, being poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) one of the most broadly used. Depending on the quantity of barrier required for the application, on occasion it is wished to follow a multilayer movie with a excessive barrier polymer in it. In the current work, the base fabric used for the tray will be PET as nicely as for the lid. Adding the nanoclay to the PET it is predicted to gain trays with enhance mechanical and barrier properties.

One of the most used clays when speakme about nanocomposites is montmorillonite (MMT). However, the clay chosen for the work has been sepiolite, which is a magnesium silicate with the following formula: Mg8Si12O30(OH)2(H2O)4 8H2O. It is a fibrous clay with nanometric dimensions that differ between 0.2 and three μm in length, 10-30nm in width, and 5–10 nm in thickness, which offers the sepiolite an excessive issue ratio of about 27. In addition, sepiolite has a floor vicinity of about 300 m2 g−1, and an outer layer of silanol groups. All these traits make the sepiolite ideal for floor amendment with organosilanes and different reagents on its surface. It has also proven higher mechanical homes than MMT in preceding works.

The migration evaluation of the trays, as nicely as microbiological assessments are accomplished to show the opportunity of the usage of this cloth for meals packaging, complying with proper legislation. In order to produce nanocomposites at industrial level, it used to be integral to do the first steps at laboratory scale, as proven in preceding works. The substances used in this paper, are these determined to be the excellent ones in phrases of processability and mechanical properties. The first step of nanocomposite fabrication at industrial stage was once to produce the masterbatches. The PET/nanosepiolite masters have been produced at Repol S.L. facilities. Conditions in the manufacturing plant have been optimized to decrease PET matrix degradation, decreasing humidity, and lowering extrusion shear on the nanocomposites.

Two one of a kind masters with 10% sepiolite every had been produced. In one master, the sepiolite was once until now modified with MEMO, and the different one with AMEO in Tolsa S.A. Then, these masters have been diluted to the closing share of sepiolite into the extruder in order to reap the corresponding sheets for characterization. The use of these modifiers reduces the sepiolite–sepiolite interactions, which favors a higher dispersion, and alignment of nanofibers that translate in effectiveness in mechanical houses. Drying prerequisites for the grasp have been 8°C for 7 h, and a 120°C for 7 h for the pristine PET. The drier used used to be a CRAMER-TROCKNER mannequin PK 100/300F. With the purpose of simplification, from now on virgin PET will be referred to as PET [5].

The industrial extruder used was once a Luigi Bandera SpA twin screw extruder, from LINPAC Packaging. In this extruder it used to be received the nanocomposite’s sheet that then is taken to a KIEFEL GmbH thermoforming laptop to attain the favored ultimate trays. The trays chosen for this task are MAP trays, with the following dimensions: 18 cm width, 25 cm length, and forty five mm depth. In this work it will be referred to as B1825-45 tray. The nanocomposite trays are despatched to a rooster packer (Sada, Nutreco. Spain). There, two kg of breast hen are packed in a modified surroundings containing 70% CO2, 20% O2, and 10% N2 in every tray. Control trays are packed in the equal way, in a PET tray. Then, samples are taken for microbiological evaluation of mesophilic aerobes and Enterobacteriaceae for 14 days. In this work, the microbiological great of poultry fillets was once assessed via deciding the variety of mesophilic cardio bacteria, and Enterobacteriaceae. These analyses will assist us decide if microbial load of these species in chicken, packed in nanocomposite trays, is decrease than that packed in ordinary PET, in order to have an notion of meals sanitary quality.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abadias, M., J. Usall, M. Anguera, C. Solsona, and I. Viñas. "Microbiological quality of fresh, minimally-processed fruit and vegetables, and sprouts from retail establishments." Int J Food Microbiol 123 (2008): 121-129.
  2. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  3. Yashoda, K. P., N. M. Sachindra, P. Z. Sakhare, and D. Narasimha Rao. "Microbiological quality of broiler chicken carcasses processed hygienically in a small scale poultry processing unit." J Food Qual 24 (2001): 249-259.
  4. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  5. Gallego, Raúl, David García‐López, Juan Carlos Merino, and José María Pastor. "How do the shape of clay and type of modifier affect properties of polymer blends?." J Appl Polym Sci 127 (2013): 3009-3016.
  6. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  7. Tanaka, F. H., S. A. Cruz, and L. B. Canto. "Morphological, thermal and mechanical behavior of sepiolite-based poly (ethylene terephthalate)/polyamide 66 blend nanocomposites." Polym Test 72 (2018): 298-307.
  8. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  9. Franke, Corinna, Linda Höll, Horst-Christian Langowski, Hannes Petermeier, and Rudi F. Vogel. "Sensory evaluation of chicken breast packed in two different modified atmospheres." Food Packag Shelf Life 13 (2017): 66-75.
  10. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

arrow_upward arrow_upward