GET THE APP

Epigenetic Regulation of Immune Cell Differentiation and Function
Journal of Immunobiology

Journal of Immunobiology

ISSN: 2476-1966

Open Access

Brief Report - (2025) Volume 10, Issue 1

Epigenetic Regulation of Immune Cell Differentiation and Function

Noushmehr Campos*
*Correspondence: Noushmehr Campos, Department of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Email:
Department of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Received: 01-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. jib-25-168750; Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025, Pre QC No. P-168750; Reviewed: 15-Mar-2025, QC No. Q-168750; Revised: 20-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. R-168750; Published: 27-Mar-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2476-1966.2025.10.263
Citation: Campos, Noushmehr. “Epigenetic Regulation of Immune Cell Differentiation and Function.” J Immuno Biol 10 (2025): 263.
Copyright: © 2025 Campos N. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

The immune system is a dynamic network of diverse cell types that must be finely regulated to ensure effective defense against pathogens while avoiding damage to self-tissues. The process by which hematopoietic stem cells give rise to a multitude of specialized immune cells-such as T cells, B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells-involves intricate regulatory mechanisms that govern cell fate decisions, lineage commitment, and functional specialization. While genetic factors provide the blueprint for immune responses, it is the layer of epigenetic regulation that allows for cellular plasticity, adaptability, and context-specific gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence. Epigenetic mechanisms-including DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNAs-play pivotal roles in shaping immune cell development and function. They dynamically orchestrate transcriptional programs in response to environmental stimuli, infections, and inflammation, thereby maintaining immune homeostasis or contributing to immune dysfunction [1].

Description

Epigenetic regulation refers to heritable and reversible modifications to chromatin structure that influence gene expression independently of DNA sequence changes. The major epigenetic mechanisms include DNA methylation, histone post-translational modifications, chromatin remodeling, and regulation by non-coding RNAs. These modifications collectively determine the accessibility of transcription factors to DNA, thus shaping transcriptional landscapes that define immune cell identity and functional states. DNA methylation, primarily occurring at cytosine residues within CpG dinucleotides, is a critical regulator of gene expression and lineage commitment in immune cells. Methylation typically represses gene transcription by impeding transcription factor binding or recruiting repressive protein complexes. During hematopoiesis, lineage-specific DNA methylation patterns guide the differentiation of multipotent stem cells into various immune cell types [2].

Traditionally, immunological memory has been attributed solely to adaptive immune cells. However, recent evidence reveals that innate immune cells such as monocytes and NK cells can also develop a form of memory-termed â??trained immunityâ?-through epigenetic reprogramming. Exposure to certain stimuli (e.g., β-glucan or BCG vaccine) leads to lasting changes in chromatin accessibility and histone modifications, resulting in enhanced responses to subsequent infections. Trained immunity is characterized by increased H3K4me3 and H3K27ac at promoters and enhancers of inflammatory genes, allowing for rapid and robust responses upon restimulation. In contrast, endotoxin tolerance-a phenomenon observed after repeated exposure to LPS-induces repressive marks like H3K9me3 and DNA hypermethylation at proinflammatory loci, thereby dampening responses. These opposing epigenetic outcomes illustrate the flexibility and context-dependence of innate immune training. Epigenetic aberrations contribute to the pathogenesis of numerous immune-related diseases [3].

The reversibility of epigenetic modifications presents a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention. Epigenetic drugs, including DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (e.g., azacitidine, decitabine) and HDAC inhibitors (e.g., vorinostat, romidepsin), are already in clinical use for hematological malignancies and are being investigated in autoimmunity and chronic inflammation. Epigenetic therapy can restore immune function by reactivating silenced genes, promoting T cell infiltration, or reprogramming suppressive myeloid cells in the TME. For instance, combining epigenetic drugs with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown synergistic effects in preclinical cancer models by reversing T cell exhaustion and enhancing antigen presentation [4,5].

Conclusion

Epigenetic regulation is central to the development, specialization, and functional adaptability of the immune system. Through mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNA activity, the epigenome acts as a dynamic interface between genetic programming and environmental influences. These regulatory layers guide immune cell differentiation, maintain immune tolerance, enable memory formation, and orchestrate context-specific responses. Dysregulation of epigenetic processes underlies numerous immune-mediated diseases, while therapeutic modulation of the epigenome holds tremendous potential for restoring immune balance and enhancing immune-based therapies. As our understanding of immune epigenetics deepens and technologies for mapping and editing the epigenome advance, we move closer to realizing precision immunotherapy tailored to individual epigenetic landscapes. This frontier of immunology not only enhances our grasp of immune complexity but also offers innovative strategies to combat infection, inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. He, Xing and Chenqi Xu. "Immune checkpoint signaling and cancer immunotherapy." Cell Res 30 (2020): 660-669.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

  1. Liu, David, Russell W. Jenkins and Ryan J. Sullivan. "Mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade." Am J Clin Dermatol 20 (2019): 41-54.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

  1. Sukocheva, Olga, Mario Menschikowski, Albert Hagelgans and Nagendra Sastry Yarla, et al. "Current insights into functions of phospholipase A2 receptor in normal and cancer cells: More questions than answers." Semin Cancer Biol (2019): 116-127

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

  1. Huna, Anda, Audrey Griveau, David Vindrieux and Sara Jaber, et al. "PLA2R1 promotes DNA damage and inhibits spontaneous tumor formation during aging." Cell Death Dis 12 (2021): 190.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

  1. Castriconi, Roberta, Alessandra Dondero, Raffaella Augugliaro and Claudia Cantoni, et al. "Identification of 4Ig-B7-H3 as a neuroblastoma-associated molecule that exerts a protective role from an NK cell-mediated lysis." Proc Natl Acad Sci 101 (2004): 12640-12645.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

 

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 34

Journal of Immunobiology received 34 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Immunobiology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward