GET THE APP

Recruitment of Inflammatory Cells to Vascular Lesions
..

Journal of Interventional and General Cardiology

ISSN: 2684-4591

Open Access

Short Communication - (2023) Volume 7, Issue 5

Recruitment of Inflammatory Cells to Vascular Lesions

Amrut Ambardekar*
*Correspondence: Amrut Ambardekar, Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA, Email:
Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA

Received: 01-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. jigc-23-116515; Editor assigned: 04-Sep-2023, Pre QC No. P-116515; Reviewed: 14-Sep-2023, QC No. Q-116515; Revised: 19-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. R-116515; Published: 26-Sep-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2684-4591.2023.7.210
Citation: Ambardekar, Amrut. “Recruitment of Inflammatory Cells to Vascular Lesions.” J Interv Gen Cardiol 7 (2023): 210.
Copyright: © 2023 Ambardekar A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading global health concern, responsible for a significant burden of morbidity and mortality. Within the realm of cardiovascular research, biomarkers play a crucial role in risk assessment, diagnosis and prognosis. One such biomarker that has garnered substantial attention is C-reactive protein. This article explores the relationship between CRP levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with various cardiovascular diseases. We will delve into the significance of CRP, its association with different CVDs, and its potential as a prognostic tool. C-reactive protein, an acute-phase reactant synthesized primarily in the liver, is a well-established biomarker of inflammation. It plays a pivotal role in the body's immune response to infection and tissue injury. CRP levels rise rapidly in response to inflammatory stimuli, making it a sensitive marker of systemic inflammation. Beyond its utility in diagnosing infections or inflammatory conditions, CRP has emerged as a valuable marker in the cardiovascular arena. Inflammation has been recognized as a key player in the development and progression of atherosclerosis, the underlying cause of most cardiovascular events. In response to endothelial dysfunction and lipid deposition, inflammatory cells infiltrate arterial walls, leading to plaque formation and rupture. CRP has been shown to reflect the degree of vascular inflammation and is associated with the presence and extent of atherosclerosis. Elevated CRP levels are observed in individuals at risk of or with established CVD. Several large-scale epidemiological studies have demonstrated that elevated CRP levels are predictive of future cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality.

Description

This predictive value holds even after adjusting for traditional risk factors, such as cholesterol levels and blood pressure. CRP levels have been studied extensively in the context of various cardiovascular diseases. Elevated CRP levels are strongly associated with the presence and severity of CAD. It has been shown that individuals with high CRP levels are at increased risk of acute coronary events, and CRP levels correlate with the extent of coronary artery stenosis. CRP levels are elevated in the acute phase of MI and have been associated with worse outcomes, including higher mortality rates and an increased risk of recurrent events. CRP has been linked to an increased risk of ischemic stroke, especially in patients with atherosclerosis and atrial fibrillation. Elevated CRP levels are associated with stroke severity and poor functional outcomes. In heart failure patients, elevated CRP levels are indicative of inflammation and are associated with disease progression and worse prognosis. CRP levels can help stratify HF patients based on their risk of adverse outcomes. Elevated CRP levels are observed in individuals with PAD, and high CRP levels have been associated with an increased risk of amputation and cardiovascular events in PAD patients. AF is associated with inflammation, and CRP levels have been shown to be higher in AF patients. Elevated CRP levels in AF are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events and adverse outcomes. The exact mechanisms underlying the association between CRP and cardiovascular risk are still under investigation. CRP may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, a critical early step in atherosclerosis development. This dysfunction impairs the regulation of vascular tone and promotes inflammation [1].

CRP has been linked to the destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques, making them more prone to rupture, thrombosis, and acute cardiovascular events. CRP may enhance the prothrombotic state, increasing the risk of thrombosis and clot formation in coronary arteries or cerebral vessels. CRP can activate inflammatory signaling pathways, contributing to the progression of atherosclerosis and the destabilization of plaques. While CRP has shown promise as a predictor of cardiovascular risk, its role in clinical practice remains somewhat controversial. High sensitivity CRP assays are used to measure lower levels of CRP accurately. hs-CRP testing is often recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CVD to further refine their risk assessment. In primary prevention, CRP testing may help identify individuals at higher risk of future cardiovascular events who may benefit from lifestyle modifications, such as dietary changes, exercise, and smoking cessation. In secondary prevention, CRP levels can assist in risk stratification and guide treatment decisions. Individuals with high CRP levels may be candidates for more aggressive management, including lipid-lowering therapy and antiplatelet agents. The use of CRP in clinical practice should involve shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers. Patients should be informed about the potential benefits and limitations of CRP testing. CRP is a non-specific marker of inflammation and can be elevated in various conditions, including infections, autoimmune diseases, and chronic inflammatory conditions. Interpreting CRP levels in the context of a patient's overall clinical presentation is crucial. CRP levels can vary among individuals, and a single measurement may not capture an individual's long-term risk accurately [2].

Multiple measurements over time may provide a more reliable assessment. The exact role of CRP in guiding treatment decisions, especially in primary prevention, remains a topic of debate. While high CRP levels are associated with increased risk, it is not always clear how aggressively to treat individuals based solely on CRP measurements. Ongoing research aims to further elucidate the role of CRP in cardiovascular risk assessment. Studies are exploring the utility of combining CRP with other biomarkers or risk factors to enhance predictive accuracy. Genetic studies may provide insights into the genetic determinants of CRP levels and their association with cardiovascular risk. Research is ongoing to investigate whether reducing inflammation, as measured by CRP levels, through medications like anti-inflammatory agents can improve cardiovascular outcomes. C-reactive protein has emerged as a valuable biomarker in cardiovascular medicine, providing insights into the link between inflammation and cardiovascular risk. Elevated CRP levels have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in various cardiovascular diseases, including CAD, MI, stroke, HF, PAD and AF. While CRP testing has the potential to refine risk assessment and guide treatment decisions, challenges related to non-specificity and treatment implications exist. Ongoing research holds promise for a more nuanced understanding of CRP's role in cardiovascular risk assessment and its potential as a therapeutic target. In clinical practice, CRP testing should be integrated into a comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular risk, considering individual patient factors and shared decision-making. Cardiovascular diseases represent a significant global health challenge, accounting for a substantial portion of morbidity and mortality worldwide [3].

The identification of reliable biomarkers for assessing cardiovascular risk is essential for early diagnosis, prognostication, and therapeutic decisionmaking. C-Reactive Protein an acute-phase reactant produced by the liver in response to inflammation, has emerged as a valuable biomarker in assessing cardiovascular risk. In this article, we will explore the role of CRP in predicting cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with various cardiovascular diseases, examining its clinical significance, measurement methods, associated mechanisms, and implications for patient care. C-Reactive Protein is an ancient biomarker. It is part of the body's natural defense mechanism against infections and tissue injury. CRP is produced in the liver in response to interleukin-6 and other proinflammatory cytokines released during acute and chronic inflammation. Its primary role is to bind to damaged cells and pathogens, leading to their removal by the immune system. The clinical significance of CRP in cardiovascular disease has been a subject of extensive research. CRP is associated with various processes involved in atherosclerosis, the underlying cause of most CVDs. CRP plays a role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. It promotes the recruitment of inflammatory cells to vascular lesions, increasing plaque vulnerability and the risk of rupture. CRP impairs endothelial function, which is a crucial determinant of vascular health. Dysfunction of the endothelium contributes to the development of atherosclerosis. Elevated CRP levels are associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. CRP promotes platelet activation and thrombus formation. CRP may contribute to pathological vascular remodeling, leading to the narrowing of blood vessels and reduced blood flow. This assay measures lower levels of CRP and is used for cardiovascular risk assessment. It is highly sensitive and suitable for detecting chronic low-grade inflammation [4].

The standard CRP assay measures higher levels of CRP and is often used in the diagnosis of acute infections and inflammatory conditions. ELISA is a commonly used laboratory technique to measure CRP levels.It is available in both standard and high-sensitivity versions. Modern clinical analyzers offer automated CRP testing, providing quick and reliable results. Elevated CRP levels in apparently healthy individuals are associated with an increased risk of future cardiovascular events. High-sensitivity CRP testing can help identify individuals at higher risk who may benefit from lifestyle modifications or preventive therapies. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, CRP levels can provide additional prognostic information. High CRP levels are associated with an increased risk of recurrent events, such as myocardial infarction or stroke. CRP levels can aid in risk stratification, helping clinicians categorize patients into low, intermediate, or high-risk groups. This information informs treatment decisions, including the use of statins and antiplatelet agents. CRP levels can be used to monitor the response to anti-inflammatory or lipid-lowering therapies. A reduction in CRP levels is often considered a favorable response to treatment. CRP has been studied in the context of various cardiovascular diseases, shedding light on its role in different clinical scenarios. CRP levels are elevated in CAD and are associated with the severity of coronary lesions. High CRP levels in patients with CAD indicate a poorer prognosis and an increased risk of adverse events. In ACS, CRP is often markedly elevated, reflecting acute inflammation and tissue damage. Elevated CRP levels at admission are associated with a higher risk of complications and mortality. Elevated CRP levels are common in heart failure and are associated with disease severity and prognosis. CRP can provide valuable prognostic information in heart failure patients. CRP has been linked to an increased risk of stroke, particularly in individuals with underlying atherosclerosis. It may contribute to the pathogenesis of stroke through its proinflammatory effects. Elevated CRP levels are observed in patients with PAD and are associated with disease progression and cardiovascular events [5].

Conclusion

CRP may play a role in the development of PAD. In AF, CRP levels have been linked to a higher risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke. Inflammation may contribute to the initiation and perpetuation of AF. Several mechanisms underlie the association between elevated CRP levels and cardiovascular events. CRP is a marker of inflammation, and chronic inflammation is a key driver of atherosclerosis and plaque instability. CRP impairs endothelial function, reducing the production of nitric oxide and promoting vasoconstriction. CRP can induce oxidative stress, leading to endothelial cell damage and the initiation of atherosclerotic lesions. CRP levels help clinicians stratify patients into different risk categories, guiding treatment decisions and preventive strategies. CRP can be used to monitor the response to anti-inflammatory or lipid-lowering therapies, ensuring optimal disease management. Elevated CRP levels may motivate patients to adopt healthier lifestyles and adhere to treatment plans. CRP continues to be a subject of research in the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting inflammation in cardiovascular disease. In the future, further research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms by which CRP contributes to cardiovascular events and to explore targeted therapies aimed at reducing inflammation and CRP levels. Additionally, the integration of CRP testing into clinical practice guidelines will enhance its utility in risk assessment and treatment decision-making for cardiovascular diseases.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Zotov, Aleksandr, Sergei Vachev, Daniil Borisov and Aleksandr Troitskiy, et al. "Thoracoscopic pulmonary vein and left atrial posterior wall isolation combined with left atrial appendage resection in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation."Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 35 (2020): 22-27.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  2. Van Laar, Charlotte, G. S. Geuzebroek, Frederik N. Hofman and Bart P. Van Putte. "The totally thoracoscopic left atrial maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation."Cardiothoracic Surg (2016).

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Batko, Jakub, Daniel Rams, Grzegorz Filip and Artur Bartoszcze, et al. "Left atrial appendage morphology and course of the circumflex artery: Anatomical implications for left atrial appendage occlusion procedures."Innovations17 (2022): 424-429.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  4. Rams, Daniel, Jakub Batko, Krzysztof Bartuś and Grzegorz Filip, et al. "Left internal mammary artery operative topography for midcab and tecab procedures."Innovations(2022): 15569845221137578.

    Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Li, Xiangyu, Mingfang Li, Yongfeng Shao and Weidong Gu, et al. "Thoracoscopic ablation delays progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation."J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg(2021).

    Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 11

Journal of Interventional and General Cardiology received 11 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Interventional and General Cardiology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward