Opinion - (2025) Volume 14, Issue 1
Received: 03-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. jees-25-168944;
Editor assigned: 05-Feb-2025, Pre QC No. P-168944;
Reviewed: 10-Feb-2025, QC No. Q-168944;
Revised: 17-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. R-168944;
Published:
24-Feb-2025
, DOI: 10.37421/2332-0796.2025.14.157
Citation: Remington, Greyson. “Millimeter Wave Technology in 5G and Future Wireless Networks.” J Electr Electron Syst 14 (2025): 157.
Copyright: © 2025 Remington G. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Millimeter wave technology stands out primarily due to its abundance of available spectrum. In conventional wireless systems, bandwidth scarcity is a significant limitation, with traditional mobile frequencies often operating in narrow bands, typically less than 100 MHz. In contrast, mmWave can offer channel bandwidths in the order of gigahertz, making it possible to deliver multi-gigabit-per-second data rates. For instance, in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has allocated several bands for 5G mmWave, including the 24 GHz, 28 GHz, 37 GHz, 39 GHz and 47 GHz bands. These large chunks of spectrum facilitate the high throughput necessary for advanced applications. Another key advantage of mmWave is spatial resolution and beamforming capability. mmWave signals, due to their short wavelengths, allow the deployment of compact, high-density antenna arrays capable of precise beam steering. This enables massive MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) systems, which can direct focused beams toward individual users rather than broadcasting signals omnidirectionally. This not only improves spectral efficiency but also allows better interference management in densely populated environments. The narrow beams make mmWave especially effective for high-capacity hotspots like stadiums, shopping malls, airports and smart factories, where a large number of users and devices must be served simultaneously [2].
Despite these compelling benefits, mmWave communication faces several formidable technical and practical challenges. One of the most significant is limited propagation range. Compared to sub-6 GHz signals, mmWave frequencies experience higher path loss and are significantly more susceptible to attenuation. They are easily blocked by physical obstructions such as buildings, trees, glass, walls and even the human body. This necessitates a dense deployment of small cells, as mmWave base stations must be placed closer to the end-users to ensure reliable connectivity. Such dense network architectures increase installation and maintenance costs, particularly in rural or less populated regions where the business case for heavy infrastructure investment is less viable. Furthermore, mmWave signals are sensitive to environmental conditions, including rain, humidity and atmospheric absorption. This phenomenon, known as rain fade, can substantially weaken signal strength over distances.
To mitigate these issues, advanced beamforming and beam-tracking algorithms are being developed to dynamically steer signals around obstacles and optimize paths in real time. In addition, the concept of hybrid networks, which combine mmWave with sub-6 GHz or mid-band frequencies, is gaining traction. These multi-band architectures allow devices switch between frequency ranges based on signal strength, availability and application requirements, ensuring robust and seamless connectivity. Device compatibility and energy efficiency are other key considerations in mmWave adoption. High-frequency circuits and antennas require specialized materials and fabrication techniques, which can increase production costs. Moreover, mmWave radios tend to consume more power due to their high-speed signal processing and beamforming operations, raising concerns for battery-powered mobile devices. Research is underway to develop low-power chipsets, integrated antennas and energy-efficient modulation schemes that can make mmWave feasible for consumer electronics at scale. From a regulatory and deployment perspective, the global harmonization of mmWave spectrum is still a work in progress. Different countries have adopted various mmWave frequency bands, which can hinder global interoperability and roaming. Bodies such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and national regulators are actively working toward standardization, but spectrum availability, licensing policies and auction strategies differ widely across regions. Moreover, operators must navigate complex site acquisition processes and zoning regulations when deploying small cells in urban landscapes, slowing the rollout of mmWave-based networks.
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Journal of Electrical & Electronic Systems received 733 citations as per Google Scholar report