Phage Therapy: A Promising Alternative to Traditional Antibiotics

Ayman Torzewska^*
*Correspondence: Ayman Torzewska, Department of Biology of Bacteria, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland, Email:

Introduction

The rapid rise of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) has posed a significant threat to global public health, rendering many conventional antibiotics ineffective. As bacterial infections become increasingly difficult to treat, scientists have turned to alternative therapies, one of the most promising being phage therapy the use of bacteriophages (viruses that infect and destroy bacteria) to combat bacterial infections. Phage therapy offers a highly specific, self-replicating, and potentially resistance-overcoming approach to treating infections. Unlike broad-spectrum antibiotics, which can indiscriminately eliminate beneficial bacteria and contribute to dysbiosis, bacteriophages target only specific bacterial strains, minimizing collateral damage. With renewed interest and advancements in biotechnology, phage therapy is emerging as a viable complement or alternative to antibiotics, particularly for Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. This paper explores the principles, mechanisms, applications, advantages, and future potential of phage therapy in modern medicine [1].

Description

Phage therapy relies on bacteriophages viruses that exclusively infect bacteria to selectively eliminate pathogenic bacterial strains. Bacteriophages attach to bacterial cell receptors, inject their genetic material, and hijack the bacterial machinery to replicate. This process eventually leads to bacterial lysis, releasing new phages to infect nearby bacteria. This self-perpetuating cycle allows phages to continue targeting bacterial populations until they are eradicated. Unlike antibiotics, which act through chemical interactions, phages evolve alongside bacteria, reducing the likelihood of long-term resistance development. Historically, phage therapy was first explored in the early 20th century by Félix d’Herelle and was successfully used to treat bacterial infections before antibiotics became widespread. However, with the discovery of antibiotics, phage research declined, particularly in Western medicine. Interest in phage therapy has resurged in recent years due to the alarming rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical trials and compassionate-use cases have demonstrated the potential of phage therapy in treating chronic and drug-resistant infections, particularly in wound infections, respiratory diseases urinary tract infections, and sepsis [2].

One of the key advantages of phage therapy is its specificity. Unlike broad-spectrum antibiotics that disrupt the gut microbiome and contribute to secondary infections such as Clostridioides difficile colitis, phages selectively target pathogenic bacteria while leaving beneficial microbes unharmed. Additionally, phages can penetrate biofilms dense bacterial communities that protect pathogens from antibiotics and the immune system. Biofilm-associated infections, such as those in chronic wounds, implanted medical devices, and cystic fibrosis lungs, are particularly difficult to treat with antibiotics alone. Phages, however, can degrade biofilms and reach bacteria embedded within these protective layers. Despite its potential, several challenges must be addressed before phage therapy can become a mainstream treatment. One major hurdle is the narrow host range of phages, as they are often strain-specific. This necessitates precise bacterial identification and, in some cases, the development of personalized phage cocktails tailored to an individual’s infection. Additionally, the immune system may neutralize phages before they can exert their full effect, reducing therapeutic efficacy [3].

Regulatory approval remains another challenge, as phages are biological agents with complex mechanisms that require rigorous safety and efficacy testing. Unlike antibiotics, which can be mass-produced with standardized formulations, phage therapy often requires individualized preparation, complicating large-scale implementation. To overcome these challenges, researchers are exploring genetically modified phages, engineered to expand host range, enhance bacterial lysis, or evade immune detection. Additionally, combination therapies that integrate phages with antibiotics or antimicrobial peptides are being investigated to maximize effectiveness and reduce bacterial resistance. Advances in sequencing and artificial intelligence (AI) are also improving phage selection and matching, paving the way for more precise and efficient treatments. Phage therapy is based on the use of bacteriophages viruses that specifically infect and lyse bacterial cells to combat bacterial infections. Unlike antibiotics, which target a broad range of bacteria indiscriminately, phages have a high degree of specificity, attacking only particular bacterial strains. This specificity allows for targeted elimination of pathogens while leaving beneficial microbiota intact, reducing the risk of dysbiosis and secondary infections. The mechanism of action of phages involves recognizing bacterial surface receptors, injecting their genetic material, hijacking the bacterial replication machinery, and ultimately causing bacterial lysis, releasing new phages that continue the infection cycle. This self-replicating nature of phages makes them particularly effective against bacterial populations, ensuring continuous bacterial suppression until the infection is cleared [4].

One of the key advantages of phage therapy is its ability to overcome antibiotic resistance. While bacteria can develop resistance to antibiotics through genetic mutations and horizontal gene transfer, phages co-evolve with bacteria, enabling them to adapt and counteract bacterial defense mechanisms. This evolutionary advantage makes phages an attractive alternative to traditional antibiotics, particularly in treating infections caused by Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) pathogens. Phage therapy has shown promise in targeting dangerous bacterial strains such as Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Carbapenem-Resistant Entero Bacteriaceae (CRE), and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which are responsible for severe and often untreatable infections. Another significant advantage of phage therapy is its effectiveness against biofilms, which are protective bacterial communities that form on surfaces such as medical implants, catheters, and lung tissue in cystic fibrosis patients. Biofilms make bacterial infections highly resistant to antibiotics by creating a physical barrier and altering bacterial metabolism, rendering many drugs ineffective. However, phages produce enzymes called depolymerases, which can degrade biofilm structures, allowing phages to reach and destroy the bacteria within. This makes phage therapy particularly valuable for treating chronic infections, including diabetic foot ulcers, osteomyelitis, urinary tract infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia [5].

Despite its potential, phage therapy faces several challenges. One of the biggest limitations is the narrow host range of phages, as many bacteriophages only infect specific bacterial strains. This means that phage therapy often requires a personalized approach, where bacterial isolates from a patient’s infection must be tested against different phages to find an effective match. Some clinical strategies involve developing phage cocktails, which combine multiple phages to broaden bacterial coverage and reduce the risk of bacterial resistance. Additionally, phages can be engineered using genetic modifications to enhance their effectiveness, increase host range, and improve bacterial killing capabilities. Another challenge is the immune system’s response to phage therapy. While phages are generally well tolerated, the human immune system may recognize and neutralize them before they can exert their full therapeutic effect. This issue is particularly relevant in systemic infections, where phages must circulate in the bloodstream. Strategies to mitigate immune clearance include encapsulation techniques, repeated dosing, and engineering phages to evade immune detection.

Regulatory hurdles also pose an obstacle to widespread phage therapy adoption. Unlike antibiotics, which are chemically synthesized and standardized, phages are biological entities that require strain-specific selection and customization, complicating their approval process. The lack of large-scale clinical trials has further slowed regulatory acceptance, although recent successful case studies and compassionate-use treatments have provided compelling evidence of their effectiveness. In response, several research initiatives are underway to establish phage therapy as a mainstream treatment option, with on-going clinical trials testing its efficacy against antibiotic-resistant infections. Phage therapy is also being explored in combination with antibiotics, as some phages can increase bacterial permeability to certain drugs, enhancing their efficacy. This Phage-Antibiotic Synergy (PAS) can lower the required antibiotic dose, reduce side effects, and prevent further resistance development. Additionally, advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and sequencing technologies are helping researchers identify and match phages to specific bacterial infections more efficiently, accelerating the development of personalized phage-based treatments. In summary, phage therapy holds tremendous potential as a powerful tool against bacterial infections, particularly those resistant to conventional antibiotics.

Conclusion

Phage therapy represents a promising and innovative solution to the growing crisis of antibiotic resistance. Its high specificity, ability to penetrate biofilms, and evolutionary adaptability make it a powerful tool in combating multidrug-resistant infections. While challenges such as regulatory approval, standardization, and host specificity remain, on-going research and technological advancements are steadily overcoming these barriers. With increasing clinical evidence supporting its safety and efficacy, phage therapy is poised to complement or even replace traditional antibiotics in specific applications. However, challenges such as host specificity, immune response, regulatory approval, and large-scale manufacturing must be addressed before phage therapy can be fully integrated into mainstream medicine. As research continues and new technologies enhance its application, phage therapy is poised to revolutionize the treatment of bacterial infections in the coming decades. As we enter a post-antibiotic era, harnessing the potential of bacteriophages may offer a sustainable and effective strategy for controlling bacterial infections and preserving global public health.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

1. Segneanu, Adina-Elena, Catalin Nicolae Marin, Dumitru Daniel Herea and Ionut Stanusoiu, et al. "Romanian Viscum album L.—Untargeted low-molecular metabolomic approach to engineered Viscum–AuNPs carrier assembly." Plants 11 (2022): 1820.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Song, Min, Dongmei Wu, Yang Hu and Haiyan Luo, et al. "Characterization of an Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage vB_EfaM_LG1 and its synergistic effect with antibiotic." Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11 (2021): 698807.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Codelia-Anjum, Alia, Lori B. Lerner, Dean Elterman and Kevin C. Zorn, et al. "Enterococcal urinary tract infections: A review of the pathogenicity, epidemiology and treatment." Antibiotics 12 (2023): 778.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Palmer, Kelli L., Veronica N. Kos and Michael S. Gilmore. "Horizontal gene transfer and the genomics of enterococcal antibiotic resistance." Curr Opin Microbiol 13 (2010): 632-639.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Li, Xianghui, Yuhua He, Zhili Wang and Jiacun Wei, et al. "A combination therapy of Phages and Antibiotics: Two is better than one." Int J Biologic Sci 17 (2021): 3573.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at