Impacts of RTV Covering on the Electrical Execution of Polymer Separator under Lightning Motivation Voltage Condition

Lucian Baia^*
*Correspondence: Lucian Baia, Department of Condensed Matter Physics & Advanced Technologies, University of Babes-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Email:

Description

Situated close to the equator, Malaysia is a country with one of the greatest lightning densities on the planet. Lightning adds to 70% of the blackouts in Malaysia and influences power gear, robotized network frameworks, causes information misfortunes and money related misfortunes in the country. Subsequently, thought of cover assessment under lightning motivations can be vital to assess and endeavor to defeat this issue [1]. This paper presents another way to deal with increment the electrical exhibition of polymer covers utilizing a Room Temperature Vulcanisation (RTV) covering. The assessment includes three unique settings of polymer cover, specifically uncoated, RTV type 1, and RTV type 2 upper surface coatings. Every one of the separators were tried under three unique circumstances as dry, clean wet and pungent under various motivation polarities utilizing the even-rising test technique. The voltage breakdown for each test was recorded. From the trial, it was found that the adequacy of the RTV covering application became evident when tried under pungent or contaminated conditions. It expanded the voltage endure abilities of the polymer protector up to half from the essential uncoated encasing. Under dry and clean circumstances, the RTV covering gave only a slight increment of the breakdown voltage. The expansion in voltage breakdown capacity diminished the likelihood of surface release and dry band arcing that could cause debasement of the polymeric material lodging. The RTV type 1 covering was viewed as more powerful while performing under a lightning drive. The discoveries could assist the service organizations with working on the exhibition of their covers to increment power framework unwavering quality [2].

Polymer protectors have been generally in utilized in the energy appropriation industry and electrical utilities for over forty years now. It has acquired the consideration of specialists and utilities because of its benefits such being lightweight, has a low establishment cost, simplicity of dealing with, defacement obstruction and in particular its superior execution under contamination conditions because of its hydrophobic qualities. By the by, all through the long stretches of administration, utilities and scientists have discovered a few downsides of utilizing polymer separators like maturing and corruption. From past examinations, a large portion of the scientists observed that electrical and ecological burdens were the fundamental factors that added to the maturing of polymer protectors. Electrical pressure, for example, spillage flow causes the development of dry band arcing and a lightning drive could cause flashover. Then again, ecological burdens, for example, UV radiation, intensity, dampness and contamination were viewed as the contributing variables to polymer material debasement and maturing [3]. The presence of collected contamination on a cover surface can became conductive when wetted and in this way permit the progression of a spillage current. The hydrophobic trait of a polymer separator assists with beading water on a superficial level. Be that as it may, Joule warming from a spillage current will make specific regions become dry and this can cause dry band arcing. On the off chance that the arcing or release is sufficient, it can cause a flashover across the separator. What's more, since the construction of a polymer protector comprises of various materials, for example, polymeric lodging, FRP bar and metal end fittings, impedance between these materials makes polymer covers inclined to electrical disintegration. In view of past examinations, the debasement of polymeric covers causes a deficiency of its hydrophobic trademark, surface chipping, breaks, disintegration, penetrates on the shed or lodging and most terrible of all it permits dampness to enter and influence the separator centre [4].

The RTV covering application strategy has been generally utilized for porcelain or glass encasings in lessening the likelihood of flashover contrasted with different techniques due with its great dielectric properties, adaptability over a large number of temperatures, grip qualities, further developed resistance to de-polymerisation, quicker application and in particular the application should be possible under stimulated conditions. One of the significant benefits of the RTV silicone covering is its capacity in holding water repellence under open air enduring and high voltage conditions [5]. With a perfect protector surface, RTV with a low surface energy property doesn't permit wetting on the separator surface. Then again, when the protector surface is defiled, the RTV low particle weight silicone liquid that diffuses from the majority of the covering makes a monolayer of liquids (keeps the impurity from dissolving in water) and gives a non-wetting property/hydrophobicity to the pollutant layer [6]. These outcomes in the arrangement of a feeble and non-conductive electrolyte layer, which isn't helpful for the improvement of a spillage current or flashover. From past exploration, investigations of RTV coatings have just inspected glass or porcelain kinds of cover. RTV covering applications on ceramic protectors can keep going for as long as 15 years. Moreover, RTV coatings can be applied direct to an empowered protector with less support required which makes it the best elective covering technique contrasted with an oil covering. Be that as it may, similarly as is known, no previous estimations have been made for a RTV covered polymer encasing particularly under a lightning motivation condition. Assessment of cover execution under a lightning drive is essential because of high-thickness of lightning events in Malaysia. Thusly, the point of this paper is to explore the impacts of a RTV covering on a polymer separator to further develop encasing execution under lightning drive conditions and standard wave shapes.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Gubanski, S. M. "Modern outdoor insulation-concerns and challenges." IEEE Electr Insul Mag 21 (2005): 5-11.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Muniraj, C. and S. Chandrasekar. "Analysis of leakage current on polluted polymer insulator by high resolution spectrum estimation method." IEEE Int Conf Intell Energy Power Syst IEEE (2009): 1-5.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Charalampidis, P, Maurizio Albano, Huw Griffiths and Ronald T. Waters, et al. "Silicone rubber insulators for polluted environments part 1: enhanced artificial pollution tests." IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 21 (2014): 740-748.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Fernando, M. A. R. M and S. M. Gubanski. "Performance of nonceramic insulators under tropical field conditions." IEEE Trans Power Syst 15 (2000): 355-360.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Kumosa, Maciej, Lucas Kumosa, and Daniel Armentrout. "Failure analyses of nonceramic insulators. Part 1: Brittle fracture characteristics." IEEE Electr Insul Mag 21 (2005): 14-27.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Jamaludin, Farah Adilah, Mohd Zainal Abidin Ab-Kadir, Mahdi Izadi and Muhammad Syahmi Abd-Rahman, et al. "Effects of RTV coating on the electrical performance of polymer insulator under lightning impulse voltage condition." PLOS one 12 (2017): e0187892.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at