Examining the Environmental Footprint of Soybean Meal through a Life Cycle Lens

Monique Thomas^*
*Correspondence: Monique Thomas, Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States of America, Email:

Introduction

Soybean meal is a crucial commodity in global agriculture, particularly within the livestock and poultry industries, due to its high protein content. As a by-product of soybean oil extraction, soybean meal has become an essential component in animal feed formulations, driving its demand worldwide. The growing global population, accompanied by shifting dietary preferences towards increased meat consumption, has significantly amplified the demand for soybean meal. However, the rapid expansion of soybean meal production raises critical concerns regarding its environmental sustainability. The environmental footprint of soybean meal is not confined solely to the cultivation of soybeans but extends across its entire life cycle from raw material extraction to its processing, transportation and use in animal feed. As climate change, resource depletion and biodiversity loss continue to challenge the global environment, evaluating the ecological impacts of soybean meal production has become increasingly vital.

A comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) provides a systematic framework for assessing the environmental impacts of soybean meal, offering valuable insights across all stages of its production and use. LCA enables a holistic examination of the resource use, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and land alteration associated with the entire supply chain. By evaluating these impacts, LCA facilitates the identification of key environmental hotspots, offering a basis for informed decision-making and the development of strategies to reduce environmental harm. This paper aims to explore the environmental footprint of soybean meal through a life cycle lens, providing an in-depth analysis of the major stages in its life cycle and identifying potential avenues for reducing its environmental impact. By doing so, it seeks to inform the ongoing dialogue on sustainable agricultural practices and the pursuit of a more ecologically responsible food production system [1].

Description

The production of soybean meal involves several interconnected stages, each contributing to the overall environmental impact of the product. These stages encompass the cultivation of soybeans, the processing of soybeans into meal, transportation and the final use of soybean meal in animal feed. Each of these stages carries distinct environmental burdens, which must be evaluated comprehensively to fully understand the sustainability challenges posed by soybean meal. The initial stage of the soybean meal life cycle begins with soybean cultivation, predominantly occurring in regions such as South America, the United States and Argentina. Soybean farming typically involves large-scale monoculture practices, which necessitate significant inputs, including fertilizers, pesticides, water and energy. The environmental impacts of this stage are particularly pronounced in terms of land use. Soybean farming, especially in countries like Brazil, has been associated with widespread deforestation, particularly in ecologically sensitive areas like the Amazon rainforest. Deforestation for agricultural expansion not only leads to the loss of biodiversity but also contributes significantly to climate change, as the carbon sequestered in forests is released into the atmosphere [2].

Furthermore, intensive agricultural practices often rely heavily on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which can lead to nutrient runoff and soil degradation. The application of fertilizers, in particular, results in the emission of Nitrous Oxide (N2O), a potent greenhouse gas. Additionally, the energy-intensive nature of modern farming practices, particularly with the use of mechanized equipment, contributes to fossil fuel consumption and further exacerbates greenhouse gas emissions. Water use is another critical consideration in soybean cultivation, particularly in regions where irrigation is necessary. Excessive water consumption can contribute to water scarcity, especially in areas already facing significant water stress. Once harvested, soybeans are transported to processing facilities where they are crushed to extract soybean oil. The byproduct of this process is soybean meal, a high-protein feed ingredient widely used in animal nutrition. The energy consumption associated with the crushing process is substantial, with much of the energy derived from fossil fuels such as natural gas or electricity, depending on the region. This stage of processing contributes significantly to the overall environmental footprint of soybean meal, particularly in terms of carbon emissions [3].

In addition to energy consumption, the processing of soybeans generates waste byproducts, such as soybean hulls, which may be repurposed for other industrial uses or disposed of. The management of these byproducts can have varying environmental consequences, depending on how waste is handled. Water use is another consideration in soybean processing, with water being utilized for cooling, cleaning and, in some cases, chemical treatment. As with agricultural water consumption, excessive water use during processing can strain local water resources, particularly in regions where water scarcity is already a concern. After processing, soybean meal is transported to various destinations, including animal feed mills, farms and other processing plants. The transportation of soybean meal can account for a significant portion of its environmental footprint, especially when it is shipped over long distances. For example, soybean meal produced in South America is often exported to Asia, Europe, or North America, which requires significant energy and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon footprint of transportation is influenced by several factors, including the mode of transport (e.g., truck, train, or ship), the distance traveled and the fuel efficiency of the transport vehicles. Given the global nature of soybean meal trade, long-distance transportation often results in substantial emissions, particularly from shipping and road transport. While the shipping industry has made strides in improving fuel efficiency, it remains a significant source of carbon emissions due to the reliance on fossil fuels. Additionally, transportation-related emissions contribute to other environmental concerns, such as air pollution and resource depletion [4].

The primary use of soybean meal is as an ingredient in animal feed, where it serves as a key source of protein for livestock, poultry and aquaculture. Despite its nutritional benefits, the use of soybean meal in animal feed has indirect environmental impacts, particularly through the emissions of methane from ruminant animals (e.g., cattle, sheep and goats). Methane is a potent greenhouse gas and the digestive processes of ruminants produce significant amounts of methane, which escapes into the atmosphere. Another environmental concern associated with animal feed is nutrient pollution. Excessive or poorly managed feed can lead to nutrient runoff, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, which can contaminate water bodies and lead to eutrophication, harmful algal blooms and water quality degradation. Efficient feed conversion is also an important factor in reducing environmental impact; animals that efficiently convert feed into body mass require less feed and, consequently, reduce the environmental burden associated with feed production. The final stage of the life cycle of soybean meal involves the disposal of unused feed, byproducts and animal waste. Improper waste management can result in environmental degradation, as organic materials decompose in landfills, releasing methane into the atmosphere. Additionally, animal waste, if not properly handled, can lead to nutrient runoff and water pollution. However, there are opportunities to mitigate these impacts by repurposing feed byproducts for bioenergy or composting, which can reduce waste and lower the environmental footprint of the feed industry [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the life cycle of soybean meal is characterized by several significant environmental impacts, primarily associated with soybean cultivation, processing, transportation and its use in animal feed. The most prominent environmental issues include land use change, particularly deforestation, greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption and nutrient pollution. The agricultural expansion of soybeans, particularly in ecologically sensitive regions like the Amazon, has been linked to deforestation, biodiversity loss and substantial carbon emissions. Processing and transportation contribute to energy consumption and emissions, while the use of soybean meal in animal feed results in indirect environmental impacts such as methane emissions from livestock and nutrient runoff. Despite these challenges, several strategies can help mitigate the environmental impact of soybean meal production. The adoption of sustainable agricultural practices, such as agroforestry, crop rotation and precision agriculture, can reduce the environmental burden of soybean cultivation. Furthermore, improving energy efficiency in the processing and transportation stages and exploring alternative protein sources for animal feed can contribute to reducing the overall environmental footprint. By integrating these strategies into the supply chain, stakeholders from farmers and processors to policymakers can work together to promote a more sustainable and ecologically responsible food production system. Ultimately, the findings from this life cycle assessment emphasize the importance of a comprehensive, systems-based approach to sustainability, where environmental impacts are considered at every stage of production and consumption and targeted interventions are made to reduce ecological harm.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Dalgaard, Randi, Jannick Schmidt, Niels Halberg and Per Christensen, et al. "LCA of soybean meal." Int J Life Cycle Assess 13 (2008): 240-254.

 Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

2. De Vries, Marion and Imke JM de Boer. "Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments." Livest Sci 128 (2010): 1-11.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

3. Desjardins, Raymond L., Devon E. Worth, Xavier PC Vergé and Dominique Maxime, et al. "Carbon footprint of beef cattle." Sustainability 4 (2012): 3279-3301.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

4. Kim, Daesoo, Greg Thoma, Darin Nutter and Franco Milani, et al. "Life cycle assessment of cheese and whey production in the USA." Int J Life Cycle Assess 18 (2013): 1019-1035.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

5. Mani, Mahesh, Bjorn Johansson, Kevin W. Lyons and Ram D. Sriram, et al. "Simulation and analysis for sustainable product development." Int J Life Cycle Assess 18 (2013): 1129-1136.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at