Bioprocess Modelling: Unravelling the Complexity of Biological Systems

Mauro Majone^*
*Correspondence: Mauro Majone, Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, Email:

Introduction

Bioprocess modelling is a multidisciplinary field that integrates principles from biology, chemistry, physics and engineering to understand and optimize biological processes at a molecular and cellular level. These processes form the backbone of various industries, including pharmaceuticals, food and beverages and biofuel production. The complexity of biological systems necessitates a systematic approach to comprehend their intricacies and enhance efficiency. Bioprocess modelling provides a powerful toolset to achieve this goal, offering insights into the dynamics of biological systems, aiding process optimization and facilitating the design of novel biotechnological solutions. At its core, bioprocess modelling involves the development of mathematical models that describe the behaviour of biological systems during a specific process. These models are based on fundamental principles of biology, biochemistry and chemical engineering. The objective is to create a representation of the system that captures its dynamics, allowing scientists and engineers to predict its behaviour under different conditions [1].

Description

The key components of a bioprocess model include the identification of relevant biological entities, understanding their interactions and quantifying the impact of environmental factors. These entities often include cells, enzymes, substrates and products. The interactions between these components are characterized by various biochemical and physiological parameters, such as reaction rates, growth rates and substrate utilization rates. Bioprocess models can be broadly categorized into empirical and mechanistic models. Empirical models are data-driven and rely on experimental observations to establish relationships between input and output variables. While these models are useful for predicting system behaviour based on existing data, they may lack the ability to explain the underlying biological mechanisms. On the other hand, mechanistic models aim to represent the actual biological processes occurring in the system. These models are based on a deep understanding of the underlying biology and involve the integration of mathematical equations to describe the kinetics of biochemical reactions, mass transfer and energy balance. Mechanistic models are particularly valuable for gaining insights into the fundamental principles governing bioprocesses [2].

Despite its numerous advantages, bioprocess modelling comes with its share of challenges. The inherent complexity of biological systems, characterized by nonlinearities, feedback loops and parameter uncertainties, poses difficulties in accurately capturing their behaviour. Obtaining precise experimental data for model validation can also be challenging, especially for intricate processes occurring at the cellular and molecular levels. However, recent advances in computational biology, high-throughput data analysis and systems biology have significantly enhanced the capabilities of bioprocess modelling. Integrating omics data, such as genomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics, allows for a more comprehensive understanding of cellular processes. Machine learning techniques, including neural networks and genetic algorithms, enable the extraction of patterns and correlations from large datasets, aiding in model development and validation. Moreover, the shift towards modular and flexible biomanufacturing processes has spurred the development of dynamic models that can adapt to changing conditions. These models consider the transient nature of bioprocesses, accounting for variations in cell culture conditions, nutrient availability and other environmental factors.

Biotechnology relies heavily on the efficient and scalable production of biomolecules and bioprocess modelling plays a pivotal role in achieving these goals. In the context of recombinant protein expression, for instance, bioprocess models guide the optimization of culture conditions, ensuring high cell density and protein yield. This is crucial for the economic viability of producing therapeutic proteins and enzymes on an industrial scale. The design of bioreactors, which are central to many bioprocesses, also benefits from modelling approaches. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations coupled with bioprocess models help in optimizing mixing patterns, nutrient distribution and oxygen transfer rates within the bioreactor. This aids in preventing gradients that could lead to cell stress or inefficient substrate utilization. In metabolic engineering, bioprocess models assist in the rational design of microbial strains for enhanced product yield. By incorporating genetic and metabolic information into the models, researchers can predict the impact of genetic modifications on cellular metabolism, guiding the engineering of strains with improved performance [3].

As technology continues to advance, the future of bioprocess modelling holds exciting possibilities. Integration of multi-scale models, spanning from the molecular to the process level, promises a more holistic understanding of biological systems. This includes detailed models of intracellular processes, such as gene expression and protein folding, seamlessly integrated with models describing extracellular phenomena in the bioreactor. The rise of synthetic biology, with its focus on designing and constructing new biological systems, presents new challenges and opportunities for bioprocess modelling. Predicting the behavior of synthetic biological circuits and pathways, as well as their interactions with host cells, requires advanced modelling approaches that can capture the intricacies of these engineered systems. Furthermore, the increasing emphasis on sustainability and green technologies is driving the development of bioprocess models that consider the environmental impact of biotechnological processes. This includes assessing the carbon footprint, energy efficiency and waste generation associated with bioproduction, guiding the industry towards more eco-friendly practices [4].

The applications of bioprocess modelling are diverse and span across various industries. In pharmaceuticals, for example, bioprocess models are instrumental in optimizing the production of biopharmaceuticals such as monoclonal antibodies. Understanding the dynamics of cell growth, protein expression and product purification allows for the design of efficient and costeffective manufacturing processes. In the field of biofuel production, bioprocess modelling contributes to the development of sustainable and scalable processes for converting biomass into biofuels. By simulating the biochemical pathways involved in microbial fermentation or enzymatic hydrolysis, researchers can identify key parameters influencing the yield and tailor conditions for maximum efficiency. The food and beverage industry also benefit from bioprocess modelling, where it aids in the optimization of fermentation processes for the production of various products such as beer, wine and yogurt. Understanding the kinetics of microbial growth, substrate utilization and metabolite production is crucial for maintaining product quality and consistency [5].

Conclusion

Improved soil structure, enhanced water retention and efficient nutrient uptake enable plants to withstand drought conditions more effectively. High salinity in soils can stress plants by limiting their water uptake. The enhanced nutrient availability and improved root health resulting from microbial compost fertilization can help plants manage salt stress. Plants treated with microbial compost fertilization have been observed to exhibit greater resilience to temperature extremes. The root microbiome plays a significant role in helping plants adapt to temperature fluctuations. Research conducted in droughtprone regions has shown that maize plants treated with compost tea exhibited increased drought tolerance compared to control plants. This effect was attributed to improved soil structure and enhanced water retention.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Farber, Jeffrey M. and PI372831 Peterkin, P. "Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen."Microbiol Rev55 (1991): 476-511.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Fitzgerald, Collette, Marcus Collins, Susan Van Duyne and Matthew Mikoleit, et al. "Multiplex, bead-based suspension array for molecular determination of common Salmonella serogroups." J Clin Microbiol 45 (2007): 3323-3334.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Fugett, Eric, Esther Fortes, Catherine Nnoka and Martin Wiedmann. "International Life Sciences Institute North America Listeria monocytogenes strain collection: Development of standard Listeria monocytogenes strain sets for research and validation studies." J Food Prot 69 (2006): 2929-2938.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Gerner-Smidt, P., K. Hise, J. Kincaid and S. Hunter, et al. "PulseNet USA: A five-year update." Foodborne Pathog Dis 3 (2006): 9-19.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. De Queirós, Lívia Dias, Juliana Alves Macedo and Gabriela Alves Macedo. "A new biotechnological process to enhance the soymilk bioactivity."Food Biotechnol 25 (2016): 763-770.

   Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at