GET THE APP

Transplant Rejection: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Therapies
Transplantation Technologies & Research

Transplantation Technologies & Research

ISSN: 2161-0991

Open Access

Commentary - (2025) Volume 15, Issue 2

Transplant Rejection: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Therapies

Ethan J. Clarke*
*Correspondence: Ethan J. Clarke, Department of Advanced Transplant Robotics, Midlands University of Health Technologies, Derby, UK, Email:
Department of Advanced Transplant Robotics, Midlands University of Health Technologies, Derby, UK

Received: 02-Jun-2025, Manuscript No. jttr-25-175380; Editor assigned: 04-Jun-2025, Pre QC No. P-175380; Reviewed: 18-Jun-2025, QC No. Q-175380; Revised: 23-Jun-2025, Manuscript No. R-175380; Published: 30-Jun-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-0991.2025.15.300
Citation: Clarke, Ethan J.. ”Transplant Rejection: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Therapies.” J Transplant Technol Res 15 (2025):300.
Copyright: © 2025 Clarke J. Ethan This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

The complement system's intricate network plays a critical role in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which remains a major cause of graft loss in transplant recipients. Understanding specific complement pathways and their precise activation mechanisms is essential for developing highly targeted therapies to prevent and treat AMR effectively. Crucially, inhibiting complement activation shows substantial promise in improving overall transplant outcomes and ensuring graft longevity[1].

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) continues to represent a significant immunological challenge in kidney transplantation. This article meticulously dissects the complex histologic lesions specifically associated with TCMR, providing invaluable insights into its accurate diagnosis and elucidating its profound clinical implications for long-term graft survival. Indeed, precise pathological assessment is fundamental for guiding appropriate treatment strategies to mitigate damage and preserve kidney function[2].

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is rapidly emerging as a highly promising non-invasive biomarker for detecting early organ injury and diagnosing rejection in kidney transplant recipients. This important study highlights its exceptional utility in reliably distinguishing rejection from other forms of graft dysfunction, thereby offering a powerful and promising tool for real-time monitoring and truly personalized patient management, leading to better clinical decisions[3].

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are indisputably crucial in actively maintaining immune tolerance and effectively preventing allograft rejection across various transplant settings. This comprehensive review discusses the latest advancements in understanding Treg biology, including their development and function, and explores their significant therapeutic potential in precisely modulating immune responses to promote long-term graft survival without necessitating excessive immunosuppression, thereby reducing side effects[4].

Innate immune cells, encompassing diverse populations such as neutrophils, macrophages, and NK cells, are increasingly recognized for their active and critical involvement in both initiating and perpetuating kidney allograft rejection processes. This insightful article thoroughly explores their specific roles within the complex immune landscape and identifies their potential as vital therapeutic targets to prevent severe graft damage and ultimately improve transplant outcomes significantly[5].

Identifying reliable and sensitive biomarkers for detecting heart transplant rejection is absolutely crucial for ensuring early diagnosis and facilitating timely intervention. This comprehensive review discusses the current landscape of established diagnostic tools, including invasive tissue biopsies and increasingly important emerging non-invasive markers, while also highlighting exciting future directions in biomarker discovery that promise to improve patient care and extend graft longevity considerably[6].

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) presents a particularly promising non-invasive method for accurately detecting acute and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. This pivotal study rigorously demonstrates the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of cfDNA, thereby providing a valuable and readily accessible tool for effectively monitoring lung transplant recipients and facilitating critically timely interventions to prevent irreversible graft damage and preserve respiratory function[7].

Understanding the complex long-term outcomes of allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients is undeniably critical for optimizing patient management and enhancing overall graft survival. This comprehensive scoping review synthesizes existing robust evidence, explicitly highlighting the profound impact of different rejection types on long-term graft function and meticulously identifying crucial areas for future research and innovative clinical strategies to address these challenges effectively[8].

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to represent a formidable and persistent barrier to achieving long-term kidney transplant success. This critical update reviews the current and evolving understanding of AMR mechanisms, including antibody-mediated cellular damage, and thoughtfully explores novel therapeutic strategies, such as targeted B cell therapies and plasma exchange, all aimed at improving patient outcomes and preventing devastating graft loss effectively[9].

Pancreatic islet transplantation offers a truly promising treatment option for individuals with type 1 diabetes, yet allograft rejection remains a significant and persistent critical challenge. This focused review concentrates on emerging biomarkers, particularly the highly versatile cell-free DNA, as essential non-invasive tools for the early and accurate detection of islet rejection, ultimately aiming to improve graft survival rates and enhance patient outcomes substantially[10].

Description

Understanding organ transplant rejection is paramount for improving patient care and graft longevity. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) stands as a significant cause of graft loss, where the complement system plays a critical role. Targeting specific complement pathways offers promise for novel therapies to prevent and treat AMR effectively [1]. Concurrently, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) presents its own set of challenges, particularly in kidney transplantation. Detailed histological analysis of TCMR lesions is vital for accurate diagnosis and understanding its profound clinical implications for graft survival [2]. Recent updates on AMR specifically in kidney transplantation further elaborate on these mechanisms, exploring advanced therapeutic strategies like B cell targeting and plasma exchange to combat graft loss [9]. These insights highlight the complex immunological landscape driving rejection.

Beyond the direct effector mechanisms of rejection, various immune cell populations are recognized for their roles in modulating the transplant outcome. Regulatory T cells (Tregs), for instance, are essential in maintaining immune tolerance, offering a pathway to prevent allograft rejection. Research into Treg biology and their therapeutic potential suggests new ways to modulate immune responses, potentially reducing the need for extensive immunosuppression and promoting long-term graft survival [4]. Moreover, innate immune cells, including neutrophils, macrophages, and NK cells, are increasingly implicated in both initiating and perpetuating kidney allograft rejection. Identifying their specific roles and considering them as therapeutic targets could significantly prevent graft damage and improve transplant outcomes [5]. These cellular insights offer new avenues for intervention.

The quest for non-invasive diagnostic tools has led to significant advancements in biomarker discovery. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a particularly promising non-invasive biomarker for detecting organ injury and rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Its utility in distinguishing rejection from other forms of graft dysfunction provides a valuable tool for real-time monitoring and personalized patient management [3]. This concept extends to other organs, where identifying reliable biomarkers for heart transplant rejection is crucial for early diagnosis and intervention. Current diagnostic tools, including tissue biopsies and emerging non-invasive markers, are continuously being refined, highlighting future directions for improving graft longevity [6]. Similarly, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers a promising non-invasive method for detecting acute and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Studies demonstrate its diagnostic accuracy, making it a valuable tool for monitoring lung transplant recipients and facilitating timely interventions [7]. Even in pancreatic islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes, where rejection remains a challenge, emerging biomarkers, especially cfDNA, are being explored as non-invasive tools for early detection to improve graft survival [10]. The broad applicability of cfDNA-based diagnostics across multiple organ systems underscores its transformative potential.

Ultimately, understanding the long-term outcomes of allograft rejection is critical for improving patient management and ensuring sustained graft survival. A scoping review synthesizing existing evidence reveals the significant impact of different rejection types on graft function, pinpointing areas where further research and clinical strategies are most needed [8]. The ongoing efforts to identify novel mechanisms, develop precise biomarkers, and implement targeted therapeutic interventions collectively aim to overcome the persistent challenge of allograft rejection. The future of transplantation hinges on these integrated approaches to enhance graft longevity and improve the quality of life for recipients.

Conclusion

Organ transplant rejection remains a major hurdle to long-term graft success, prompting continuous research into its mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) involves the complement system, making targeted complement inhibition a promising therapeutic strategy for preventing graft loss. Similarly, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in kidney transplants is diagnosed via histological lesions, with ongoing efforts to refine treatment based on pathological assessment. Immunological research also highlights the crucial roles of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in immune tolerance and innate immune cellsâ??like neutrophils, macrophages, and NK cellsâ??in initiating and perpetuating rejection. A significant advancement in transplant medicine is the rise of non-invasive biomarkers. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and general cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are emerging as highly valuable tools for detecting organ injury and rejection across various transplants, including kidney, heart, lung, and pancreatic islet allografts. These biomarkers offer real-time monitoring capabilities, enabling earlier diagnosis and personalized patient management. Understanding the long-term outcomes of different rejection types is also essential for refining clinical strategies. Collectively, these studies emphasize the multifaceted nature of rejection and the concerted efforts to develop innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to improve graft survival and recipient quality of life.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

Jian C, Stephen HS, Wuding Z. "The Role of Complement in Antibody-Mediated Rejection: A Clinically Focused Review.".J Am Soc Nephrol 31 (2020):2724-2736.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Branko S, Marlies M, Marilyn H. "Histologic lesions and clinical implications of T cell-mediated rejection in kidney allografts.".Curr Opin Organ Transplant 25 (2020):427-434.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Philip JO, Melanie CT, Helen LP. "Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA as a Biomarker for Rejection and Injury in Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Observational Study.".J Am Soc Nephrol 32 (2021):151-163.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Yi C, Man W, Mengjie H. "The Role of Regulatory T Cells in Organ Transplantation: An Update.".Front Immunol 12 (2021):688686.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Tímea A, Gergely A, Márta B. "Role of Innate Immune Cells in Kidney Allograft Rejection.".Biomedicines 10 (2022):738.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Ryan D, Samir K, Akash G. "Current and Future Biomarkers in Heart Transplant Rejection.".J Card Surg 37 (2022):1199-1212.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Stella TA, Burcin T, Snehal P. "Cell-Free DNA for the Diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.".Am J Transplant 23 (2023):160-170.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Thidarat L, Sarinya C, Thanyarat S. "Long-Term Outcomes of Allograft Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review.".J Clin Med 12 (2023):7267.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Rui X, Yang Z, Mengxi W. "Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies for Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: An Update.".Front Immunol 15 (2024):1350648.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Youngmi L, Jun HS, Sung HK. "Emerging Biomarkers in Pancreatic Islet Allograft Rejection: A Focus on Cell-Free DNA.".Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 39 (2024):189-198.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 223

Transplantation Technologies & Research received 223 citations as per Google Scholar report

Transplantation Technologies & Research peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward