GET THE APP

Gene Doping: Detection, Ethics, Evolving Challenges
Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies

Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies

ISSN: 2161-0673

Open Access

Commentry - (2025) Volume 15, Issue 2

Gene Doping: Detection, Ethics, Evolving Challenges

Anke Brandt*
*Correspondence: Anke Brandt, Department of Anti-Doping Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Email:
1Department of Anti-Doping Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Received: 01-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. jsmds-25-174162; Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025, Pre QC No. P-174162; Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025, QC No. Q-174162; Revised: 22-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. R-174162; Published: 29-Mar-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-0673.2025.15.418
Citation: Brandt, Anke. ”Gene Doping: Detection, Ethics, Evolving Challenges.” J Sports Med Doping Stud 15 (2025):418.
Copyright: © 2025 Brandt A. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

This article comprehensively reviews the latest advancements in methods for detecting gene doping. It highlights current techniques, like PCR-based methods and next-generation sequencing, and explores emerging strategies, including those targeting gene expression profiles and exosomal biomarkers, pointing towards more sophisticated detection challenges and future directions in anti-doping efforts[1].

This review delves into the complex ethical and regulatory landscape surrounding gene doping in sports. It discusses the potential for gene editing technologies to be misused for performance enhancement, raising significant questions about fairness, athlete safety, and the integrity of competition, alongside the difficulties in establishing effective detection and deterrent measures[2].

This article explores the concept of myostatin inhibition as a potential target for gene doping, discussing its physiological role in muscle growth and the implications of manipulating this pathway for athletic performance. It highlights the significant challenges in detection and the ethical dilemmas presented by such advanced forms of genetic manipulation in sports[3].

This systematic review provides an overview of existing and prospective anti-doping strategies aimed at detecting gene doping. It critically evaluates the efficacy of current methods, such as direct detection of gene transfer agents and indirect detection of gene expression changes, emphasizing the urgent need for more sophisticated and sensitive techniques to keep pace with evolving genetic manipulation technologies[4].

This article discusses the revolutionary potential of CRISPR-Cas9 technology in gene editing and its alarming implications for gene doping in sports. It examines how this precise gene editing tool could be misused to enhance athletic performance, highlighting the pressing ethical concerns and the significant challenges for anti-doping authorities to detect and regulate such advanced interventions[5].

This review explores the future landscape of gene doping, focusing on the potential targets and methods that might emerge with advancements in gene therapy and genetic engineering. It considers the ethical implications, the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between dopers and anti-doping agencies, and the necessity for proactive research and policy development to safeguard the integrity of sport[6].

This article focuses on the specific challenges associated with detecting gene doping that utilizes viral vectors for gene delivery. It discusses how the integration of foreign genetic material via these vectors can make detection difficult, underscoring the need for advanced molecular techniques to identify residual vector DNA or specific genomic integration sites, thus ensuring fair competition[7].

This paper highlights the dual threat posed by gene doping: undermining the integrity of sport and endangering athlete health. It discusses the unpredictable side effects and long-term consequences of manipulating genes for performance enhancement, ranging from immunological reactions to oncogenesis, emphasizing the critical need for strict regulatory frameworks and athlete education[8].

This review addresses the persistent challenges of molecular doping, including gene doping, in sports, focusing on the sophisticated detection methods required to identify such practices. It also delves into the complex ethical considerations surrounding the use of gene editing and other advanced biological interventions for performance enhancement, advocating for a multi-faceted approach to maintain fairness[9].

This article underscores gene doping as a significant and evolving threat to the integrity of sport, calling for the development of proactive anti-doping strategies. It emphasizes the rapid advancements in gene therapy and genetic engineering that could be repurposed for performance enhancement, necessitating continuous research, improved detection techniques, and robust regulatory frameworks to safeguard fair play[10].

Description

Gene doping poses a significant and evolving challenge to anti-doping efforts in sports, necessitating continuous advancements in detection methodologies. Current techniques for identifying gene doping include PCR-based methods and next-generation sequencing. Research also explores emerging strategies that target gene expression profiles and exosomal biomarkers, indicating a shift towards more sophisticated detection challenges. This evolution points to future directions in anti-doping efforts to keep pace with genetic manipulation [1]. A systematic review further emphasizes the urgent need for more sophisticated and sensitive techniques. It critically evaluates the efficacy of existing and prospective anti-doping strategies, encompassing both direct detection of gene transfer agents and indirect detection of gene expression changes [4].

Beyond detection, the ethical and regulatory landscape surrounding gene doping is complex. Gene editing technologies present a potential for misuse in performance enhancement, raising significant questions about fairness, athlete safety, and the integrity of competition. Establishing effective detection and deterrent measures in this area is difficult [2]. For example, the revolutionary potential of CRISPR-Cas9 technology in gene editing carries alarming implications for sports. This precise gene editing tool could be misused to enhance athletic performance, highlighting pressing ethical concerns and considerable challenges for anti-doping authorities in detecting and regulating such advanced interventions [5].

Specific targets and delivery mechanisms for gene doping also present unique challenges. The concept of myostatin inhibition is explored as a potential target, given its physiological role in muscle growth. Manipulating this pathway for athletic performance raises significant detection difficulties and ethical dilemmas, marking a new frontier in genetic manipulation in sports [3]. Similarly, gene doping that utilizes viral vectors for gene delivery introduces specific challenges. The integration of foreign genetic material via these vectors complicates detection, emphasizing the need for advanced molecular techniques to identify residual vector DNA or specific genomic integration sites, which is crucial for ensuring fair competition [7].

Gene doping presents a dual threat: undermining the integrity of sport and endangering athlete health. The manipulation of genes for performance enhancement can lead to unpredictable side effects and long-term consequences, ranging from immunological reactions to oncogenesis. This underscores the critical need for strict regulatory frameworks and athlete education [8]. The persistent challenges of molecular doping, including gene doping, in sports demand sophisticated detection methods and a multi-faceted approach to maintain fairness. This involves addressing complex ethical considerations surrounding gene editing and other advanced biological interventions [9]. Looking ahead, gene doping remains a significant and evolving threat. Proactive anti-doping strategies are vital, recognizing the rapid advancements in gene therapy and genetic engineering that could be repurposed for performance enhancement. Continuous research, improved detection techniques, and robust regulatory frameworks are essential to safeguard fair play [10].

The future landscape of gene doping requires foresight, focusing on potential targets and methods emerging from advancements in gene therapy and genetic engineering. The ethical implications are considerable, fueling an ongoing 'cat-and-mouse game' between dopers and anti-doping agencies. Proactive research and policy development are necessary to protect the integrity of sport [6]. Ultimately, addressing gene doping requires a sustained, collaborative effort that encompasses scientific innovation, ethical deliberation, and regulatory vigilance to protect both athletes and the spirit of competition.

Conclusion

Gene doping presents a significant and evolving challenge to the integrity of sport, driven by rapid advancements in gene therapy and genetic engineering. The literature highlights current and emerging detection methods, including PCR-based techniques and next-generation sequencing, alongside innovative strategies targeting gene expression profiles and exosomal biomarkers, pointing towards more sophisticated detection challenges and future directions in anti-doping efforts [1]. However, the sophisticated nature of genetic manipulation, particularly the use of viral vectors for gene delivery, makes detection difficult, requiring advanced molecular techniques to identify residual DNA or specific genomic integration sites [7]. Ethical and regulatory complexities are central to the discourse, with concerns about fairness, athlete safety, and the long-term health implications of gene editing for performance enhancement [2, 8]. The misuse of revolutionary technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 for athletic advantage raises pressing ethical dilemmas and regulatory challenges [5]. The potential for myostatin inhibition as a gene doping target further complicates the landscape, underscoring difficulties in detection [3]. Anti-doping efforts are in a constant 'cat-and-mouse game' against dopers, necessitating proactive research and policy development [6]. Systematic reviews emphasize the urgent need for more sophisticated and sensitive techniques to keep pace with evolving genetic manipulation technologies, evaluating both direct and indirect detection methods [4]. The dual threat of undermining sport integrity and endangering athlete health demands strict regulatory frameworks and comprehensive athlete education [8]. Overall, a multi-faceted approach involving continuous research, improved detection, and robust regulatory frameworks is vital to safeguard fair play and address the ongoing challenge of molecular doping in sport [9, 10].

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

  • Yuqian T, Xuefang Z, Qingping L. "Advances in Gene Doping Detection: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives".Front Pharmacol 14 (2023):1118129.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Vianney DC, Julien SB, Yannick BPVT. "Ethical and Regulatory Challenges of Gene Doping in Sports".J Clin Med 11 (2022):4081.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Vianney DC, Julien SB, Joris RD. "Myostatin Inhibition for Sports Performance: The Next Generation of Gene Doping?".Front Physiol 12 (2021):642932.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Vianney DC, Steven JB, Joris RD. "Anti-Doping Strategies to Detect Gene Doping: A Systematic Review".J Clin Med 9 (2020):2496.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Maria DP, Dario DM, Pasquale R. "CRISPR-Cas9 as a Tool for Gene Editing: Current Perspectives and Ethical Challenges in Sports".J Exerc Rehabil 19 (2023):87-94.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • M N, D AGS, G S. "Gene doping-future perspectives.".Indian J Med Res 155 (2022):420-427.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Vianney DC, Joris RD, Julien SB. "The Challenges of Gene Doping Detection: Focusing on Viral Vectors".J Clin Med 10 (2021):1217.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Vianney DC, Joris RD, Julien SB. "Gene Doping: A Threat to the Integrity of Sport and Athlete Health".J Clin Med 8 (2019):1738.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Paolo MSCdS, Rafael MMS, Fabiano BdP. "Molecular Doping in Sport: The Ongoing Challenge of Detection and Ethics".Open Med (Wars) 15 (2020):978-986.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  • Andrea PE, Maria EP, George PC. "Emerging Threats to Sport: Gene Doping and the Need for Proactive Anti-Doping Measures".J Clin Med 12 (2023):255.
  • Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

    Google Scholar citation report
    Citations: 1022

    Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies received 1022 citations as per Google Scholar report

    Journal of Sports Medicine & Doping Studies peer review process verified at publons

    Indexed In

     
    arrow_upward arrow_upward