The Complex Role of Immunoglobulins and Complement in Neuronal Activation and Repair

Arnaud Kubova^*
*Correspondence: Arnaud Kubova, Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany, Email:

Introduction

The Central Nervous System (CNS) has long been regarded as an immunologically privileged site, historically believed to be shielded from the peripheral immune system to preserve the delicate microenvironment essential for neural function. However, recent advances in neuroimmunology have fundamentally reshaped this perspective, revealing an intricate and dynamic interplay between the immune system and neural tissue. Among the key players in this neuroimmune dialogue are immunoglobulins (antibodies) and the complement system once thought to operate solely in the context of pathogen defense. Emerging research suggests these immune components have critical, yet highly nuanced, roles in the modulation of neuronal activity, synaptic remodeling, and tissue repair following injury or neurodegeneration. Rather than being merely destructive or pro-inflammatory, immunoglobulins and complement proteins can exhibit dual roles, both protective and pathological, depending on the context, timing, and molecular signals involved. This complexity challenges the traditional dichotomy of immune involvement in the brain as either beneficial or harmful and opens up a new understanding of how the immune system contributes to neural plasticity, neuroprotection, and even regeneration. In this paper, we explore the evolving role of immunoglobulins and complement proteins in the CNS, detailing their mechanisms of action, involvement in health and disease, and potential as therapeutic targets in conditions ranging from multiple sclerosis and Alzheimerâ??s disease to traumatic brain injury and peripheral nerve repair [1].

Description

Immunoglobulins, particularly IgG and IgM, are increasingly recognized not just as agents of defense but as modulators of neuronal function and repair. These antibodies can cross the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) under certain physiological and pathological conditions and bind to neuronal antigens, thereby influencing signaling cascades and synaptic activity. For example, autoantibodies targeting N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors can modulate synaptic transmission and plasticity, as seen in autoimmune encephalitis, while naturally occurring antibodies may promote homeostasis by clearing debris and facilitating neuronal recovery. Moreover, therapeutic Intravenous Immunoglobulins (IVIG) have shown promise in promoting axonal regeneration and dampening harmful inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Complement proteins, classically known for tagging pathogens and damaged cells for destruction, also play surprising roles in neurodevelopment and adult neuroplasticity. During early brain development, complement components such as C1q and C3 contribute to synaptic pruning by marking weak or unnecessary synapses for removal, a process critical for refining neural circuits [2].

However, in the diseased or aging brain, this same mechanism can become dysregulated, contributing to pathological synapse loss, as observed in Alzheimerâ??s disease and other neurodegenerative conditions. Beyond synaptic regulation, complement activation can recruit microglia and astrocytes key immune-resident cells of the CNS to sites of injury, facilitating repair or, in some cases, exacerbating damage depending on the inflammatory milieu. The dual nature of these systems reflects a context-dependent function: while they can be neuroprotective and reparative under controlled conditions, overactivation or misdirection can lead to neurotoxicity and chronic inflammation. Environmental factors, genetic predisposition, and systemic immune signals further modulate the effects of immunoglobulins and complement in the brain. For instance, systemic infections or trauma can prime microglia, alter BBB permeability, and shift the balance from repair toward neuroinflammation. Current research is also investigating how immunoglobulin therapy and complement inhibitors can be harnessed therapeutically not only to suppress harmful immune responses but also to activate reparative pathways that promote remyelination, axon regeneration, and synaptic recovery. These discoveries are fostering a paradigm shift in neurotherapeutics, encouraging the development of strategies that fine-tune rather than suppress immune functions in the nervous system [3].

This duality underscores the importance of context and regulation in determining outcomes what aids repair in one scenario may drive degeneration in another. The therapeutic implications are profound, as modulating these systems may unlock new avenues for treating a wide array of neurological conditions. Targeted immunotherapies, IVIG infusions, and complement inhibitors are already under exploration for diseases like multiple sclerosis, Alzheimerâ??s, and Guillain-BarrÃÂ?© syndrome, while precision immunomodulation holds promise for enhancing neural repair following trauma or stroke. However, translating these insights into effective treatments will require a deeper understanding of the molecular cues that govern immune activity in the nervous system, as well as careful navigation of the risks of immune manipulation in such a sensitive environment. As research progresses, a more refined picture is emerging one that positions immunoglobulins and complement not as isolated actors but as integral components of a highly adaptive and responsive neuroimmune network. Embracing this complexity opens the door to novel, holistic approaches to neural health and recovery, marking a new era in neuroscience where immune molecules are not merely tolerated in the CNS but recognized as essential allies in the brainâ??s capacity to heal and adapt [4].

The complement system, a cascade of proteins that aids antibodies in clearing pathogens, also influences neuronal processes beyond immune defense. Complement components like C1q and C3 are known to tag synapses for elimination during development and after injury a process mediated by microglia. This is critical for synaptic plasticity and repair but can also contribute to neurodegeneration if dysregulated. In conditions such as Alzheimer's disease or traumatic brain injury, excessive complement activation has been linked to synapse loss and chronic inflammation particularly IgG and IgM, can cross the blood-brain barrier under certain pathological conditions. Within the CNS, they may contribute to neuroinflammation, but also appear to play protective roles. Antibodies can promote the clearance of damaged cells and protein aggregates, assist in synaptic pruning, and modulate microglial activity affecting how neurons communicate and recover from injury. In autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis, however, abnormal antibody responses can lead to demyelination and neuronal damage [5].

Conclusion

The involvement of immunoglobulins and complement in neuronal activation and repair reveals a deeply interconnected and complex relationship between the immune and nervous systems far from the simplistic view of the immune system as a mere defender or destroyer. These molecules, traditionally associated with infection and inflammation, are now understood to play active roles in sculpting synapses, regulating neuronal excitability, and guiding regenerative responses after injury or disease. Their functions are multifaceted: immunoglobulins can exert both protective and pathogenic effects depending on their specificity, concentration, and timing, while complement components can orchestrate both synaptic pruning in development and neurodegeneration in disease.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict Of Interest

None.

References

1. Jolles, S., W. A. C. Sewell and S. A. Misbah. "Clinical uses of intravenous immunoglobulin." Clin Exp Immunol 142 (2005): 1-11.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

2. Thom, Vivien, Thiruma V. Arumugam, Tim Magnus and Mathias Gelderblom. "Therapeutic potential of intravenous immunoglobulin in acute brain injury." Front Immunol 8 (2017): 875.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

3. Soelberg Sorensen, Per. "Intravenous polyclonal human immunoglobulins in multiple sclerosis." Neurodegener Dis 5 (2007): 8-15.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

4. Halperin, Saar T., Bert A. t Hart, Antonio Luchicchi and Geert J. Schenk. "The forgotten brother: The innate-like b1 Cell in multiple sclerosis." Biomedicines 10 (2022): 606.

 Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

5. Prieto, J. M. B. and M. J. B. Felippe. "Development, phenotype and function of non-conventional B cells." Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 54 (2017): 38-44.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at