GET THE APP

Performance of Revolving Loan Fund
..

Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review

ISSN: 2223-5833

Open Access

Editorial - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 5

Performance of Revolving Loan Fund

Raja Matridi*
*Correspondence: Raja Matridi, Department of Economics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel, Email:
Department of Economics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel

Received: 02-May-2022, Manuscript No. jbmr-22-67884; Editor assigned: 04-May-2022, Pre QC No. P-67884; Reviewed: 12-May-2022, QC No. Q-67884; Revised: 17-May-2022, Manuscript No. R-67884; Published: 25-May-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2223-5833.2022.12.444
Citation: Matridi, Raja. “Performance of Revolving Loan Fund.” Arabian J Bus Manag Review 12 (2022): 444.
Copyright: © 2022 Matridi R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Editorial

Grants, guarantees, or subsidised loans for energy-saving renovations could encourage homeowners to make their investment decision more readily. In general, local and regional administrations can provide owners of private residential structures with additional financial instruments like soft loans or loan guarantees through collaboration with finance institutions. Soft loans are loans with interest rates lower than those found in the conventional market, longer payback periods, and eventually other benefits (e.g. grace period, lower administrative or insurance costs) Loan guarantees, which act as a first line of defence against non-payment losses, are incentives that spur investments in energy renovation. Towns, cities, regions, or provinces might therefore choose to encourage energy efficiency through so-called "revolving loan funds," which can differ greatly in terms of internal funding [1].

The program's main goal is to lessen the risk that air pollution, particularly PM10, PM2.5, and benzo(a)pyrene, poses to people's health and safety in areas where these pollutants are significantly above their permissible and target concentration levels and where air protection programmes have been established. The bulk of projects benefit self-governments, which distribute cash for the removal of coal-fired heat sources from municipal structures and homes owned by people and housing communities. Local heating businesses were involved as partners in numerous projects. The majority of the initiatives involved switching from coal (individual and central) heating to gas heating and connecting users who previously used coal-fired boilers and ovens to urban heating. Frequently, multi-family structures A revolving loan fund (RLF) is a self-replenishing funding tool that can be used to finance a range of initiatives, from clean water infrastructure to small company growth. For instance, revolving loans from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have long assisted states in financing clean-water and drinking-water infrastructure projects. RLFs all have the same fundamental structure, despite the fact that they might differ substantially in terms of their objective and scope. RLFs begin with a base amount of capital, which frequently consists of personal investments or subsidies from the federal or state governments. Several debtors receive loans from this money after that. The capital is restored throughout time as these borrowers make loan payments and interest payments. The fund utilises its accumulated money once there have been enough repayments made [2].

RLFs have been employed for a number of environmental activities for many years. The U.S. EPA Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) and the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF), which were established by Congress in 1987 and 1996, respectively, are two of the most well-known environmental RLFs. There are 51 of each of these RLFs in the country, and states utilise them to finance water supply enhancements, the building of wastewater facilities, and other water-related initiatives. RLFs are frequently employed to finance advancements in clean energy. For instance, Texas' Loan STAR programme has given out $250 million in loans to pay for energy efficiency upgrades in public buildings. Since 1990, around 30,000 energy efficiency projects have been funded through Nebraska's Dollar and Energy Savings Program [3].

An interest-bearing (or occasionally interest-free) loan used as funding for research campus initiatives that are anticipated to provide a particular level of savings is known as a revolving loan fund (RLF). Both internal and external sources offer RLF alternatives. For examples of how schools are use RLFs to fund brand-new energy-saving and renewable energy projects on their campuses, continue reading [4].

Overview of revolving loan funds

RLFs, sometimes known as a "green revolving fund," are being used more frequently at research campuses in higher education to assist sustainability, conservation, and greenhouse gas reduction initiatives. The RLF is refilled with the savings from one project, allowing for more investments of a similar nature. The campus gains from cost-neutral efficiency upgrades and not having to pay anything up front. As the effects of climate change become more noticeable, numerous communities are attempting to get ready for the upcoming changes. State, local, and federal policy and programmatic decisions are influenced by the idea of resilience, which refers to communities' capacity to withstand and adapt to shocks like floods, droughts, or wildfires. Revolving loan funds have been identified as a top national priority by federal policymakers. Sens. Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), and James Lankford (R-Okla.) proposed the Safeguarding Tomorrow through On-going Risk Mitigation (STORM) Act (P.L. 116-284), which became a law on January 1, 2021. The proposed legislation would permit the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) [5].

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Webber, Phil. "The impacts of household retrofit and domestic energy efficiency schemes: A large scale, ex post evaluation." Energy Policy 84 (2015): 35-43.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Sullivan, Rory. "Funding low carbon cities: local perspectives on opportunities and risks." Climate Policy 13 (2013): 514-529.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Rosenow, Jan and Nick Eyre. "The green deal and the energy company obligation." Proceed Instit Civil Eng Energy 166 (2013):127-136.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. O'Toole, Laurence J. "Hollowing the infrastructure: Revolving loan programs and network dynamics in the American states." J Pub Adm Res Theory 6 (1996): 225-242.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Gouldson, Andy, and Rory Sullivan. "Understanding the governance of corporations: an examination of the factors shaping UK supermarket strategies on climate change." Environment and Planning A 46 (2014): 2972-2990.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 5479

Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review received 5479 citations as per Google Scholar report

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward