Multiscale Modeling: From Atoms to System

Marco Santis^*
*Correspondence: Marco Santis, Department of Mathematical Engineering, Politecnico di Roma, Rome, Italy, Email:

Introduction

Multiscale modeling offers a powerful approach to understanding complex material behaviors by bridging phenomena across disparate length and time scales. This particular work highlights recent advances in integrating atomic, meso, and continuum scale simulations to predict material properties and performance. The real value comes from capturing how microscopic structures influence macroscopic responses, enabling more accurate design and optimization of novel materials [1].

Understanding cancer progression requires looking beyond single-cell events. This research showcases how multiscale modeling can integrate molecular, cellular, tissue, and organ-level interactions to simulate tumor growth, metastasis, and response to therapy. It provides a more comprehensive framework for predicting patient outcomes and designing more effective treatment strategies by considering the dynamic interplay of biological factors at different scales [2].

When dealing with micro- and nanofluidic systems, traditional continuum mechanics often breaks down. This work explores multiscale computational fluid dynamics methods that effectively combine atomistic or molecular dynamics simulations with continuum models. This integration is essential for accurately capturing phenomena like slip flow, surface tension effects, and particle transport in confined geometries, which are critical for advancements in microfluidic devices and lab-on-a-chip technologies [3].

Soft biological tissues, like skin or organs, exhibit complex, nonlinear mechanical behaviors influenced by their hierarchical structure. This review covers multiscale modeling approaches that link the properties of collagen fibers, elastin, and cells to the macroscopic tissue response. It's about developing predictive models for tissue engineering, surgical planning, and understanding disease states by accurately representing the mechanical interplay across different biological scales [4].

For composite materials, their macroscopic strength and stiffness are intricately linked to their microscopic constituents and interfaces. This research illustrates how multiscale modeling bridges the gap between the properties of individual fibers and matrix materials and the overall performance of the composite structure. It's a critical tool for designing advanced composites with tailored properties, allowing engineers to predict failure mechanisms and optimize material architectures more effectively [5].

Battery degradation is a complex process spanning from atomic-level reactions to macroscopic changes in cell performance. This study demonstrates multiscale modeling's utility in understanding and predicting battery lifespan by integrating phenomena like diffusion, phase transformations, and mechanical stress across different scales. This approach helps in designing more durable and efficient battery technologies by identifying critical degradation pathways [6].

Modeling infectious disease dynamics often requires considering factors from individual-level interactions to population-wide spread. This work highlights how multiscale models can integrate pathogen dynamics within a host, individual behavior, and social networks with epidemiological models. This integration offers a more nuanced understanding of disease transmission, aiding in the development of more effective public health interventions and pandemic preparedness strategies [7].

Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, involves complex thermal and mechanical processes occurring simultaneously across various scales. This research demonstrates how multiscale modeling can predict part distortion, residual stresses, and microstructure evolution during printing by linking melt pool dynamics, solidification, and solid-state transformations. It's a critical tool for optimizing process parameters, reducing defects, and ensuring the quality and performance of additively manufactured components [8].

Electrochemical systems, like fuel cells or batteries, rely on intricate charge and mass transport phenomena across interfaces and porous media. This study reviews how multiscale modeling integrates atomistic, mesoscopic, and continuum approaches to understand electrode reactions, electrolyte dynamics, and overall device performance. This allows for a deeper insight into reaction mechanisms and transport limitations, leading to the design of more efficient and stable electrochemical devices [9].

Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems, where fluid flow influences solid deformation and vice versa, often require bridging different physical scales. This research focuses on multiscale techniques for FSI, particularly in complex geometries or with highly deformable structures. What this really means is combining high-fidelity fluid simulations with structural mechanics at appropriate scales, which is crucial for applications ranging from aerospace engineering to biomedical devices like heart valves [10].

Description

Multiscale modeling is a powerful approach for understanding complex material behaviors by bridging phenomena across disparate length and time scales, integrating atomic, meso, and continuum simulations to predict material properties and performance [1]. This captures how microscopic structures influence macroscopic responses, enabling accurate design and optimization of novel materials. What this really means is that for composite materials, their macroscopic strength and stiffness are intricately linked to their microscopic constituents and interfaces. Multiscale modeling bridges the gap between individual fiber and matrix material properties and the overall performance of the composite structure [5]. This makes it a critical tool for designing advanced composites with tailored properties, allowing engineers to predict failure mechanisms and optimize material architectures effectively.

The application extends significantly into the biomedical field. Understanding cancer progression requires looking beyond single-cell events, with multiscale modeling integrating molecular, cellular, tissue, and organ-level interactions to simulate tumor growth, metastasis, and therapy response [2]. This framework offers a more comprehensive way to predict patient outcomes and design effective treatment strategies by considering the dynamic interplay of biological factors at different scales. Similarly, soft biological tissues, such as skin or organs, show complex, nonlinear mechanical behaviors due to their hierarchical structure. Multiscale modeling links the properties of collagen fibers, elastin, and cells to macroscopic tissue responses [4]. This approach is crucial for developing predictive models in tissue engineering, surgical planning, and understanding disease states by accurately representing mechanical interplay across various biological scales.

In fluidic and electrochemical systems, multiscale modeling proves indispensable. When dealing with micro- and nanofluidic systems, traditional continuum mechanics often breaks down. Multiscale computational fluid dynamics methods effectively combine atomistic or molecular dynamics simulations with continuum models [3]. This integration captures phenomena like slip flow, surface tension effects, and particle transport in confined geometries, critical for advancements in microfluidic devices and lab-on-a-chip technologies. Electrochemical systems, including fuel cells or batteries, rely on intricate charge and mass transport phenomena across interfaces and porous media. Multiscale modeling integrates atomistic, mesoscopic, and continuum approaches to understand electrode reactions, electrolyte dynamics, and overall device performance [9]. This allows for deeper insight into reaction mechanisms and transport limitations, leading to more efficient and stable electrochemical devices. Furthermore, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems, where fluid flow influences solid deformation, demand bridging physical scales. Multiscale techniques for FSI combine high-fidelity fluid simulations with structural mechanics at appropriate scales [10]. This is crucial for applications ranging from aerospace engineering to biomedical devices like heart valves.

Multiscale modeling also tackles challenges in material degradation and advanced manufacturing. Battery degradation is a complex process spanning atomic-level reactions to macroscopic changes in cell performance. Multiscale modeling helps understand and predict battery lifespan by integrating phenomena like diffusion, phase transformations, and mechanical stress across different scales [6]. This approach aids in designing more durable and efficient battery technologies by identifying critical degradation pathways. Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, involves complex thermal and mechanical processes occurring simultaneously across various scales. Multiscale modeling predicts part distortion, residual stresses, and microstructure evolution during printing by linking melt pool dynamics, solidification, and solid-state transformations [8]. It's a critical tool for optimizing process parameters, reducing defects, and ensuring the quality and performance of additively manufactured components.

Another vital area involves infectious disease dynamics, which requires considering factors from individual-level interactions to population-wide spread. Multiscale models integrate pathogen dynamics within a host, individual behavior, and social networks with epidemiological models [7]. This offers a more nuanced understanding of disease transmission, aiding in developing more effective public health interventions and pandemic preparedness strategies.

Conclusion

Multiscale modeling is a versatile and essential tool across numerous scientific and engineering disciplines for understanding and predicting the behavior of complex systems. It effectively bridges phenomena spanning disparate length and time scales, from atomic-level interactions to macroscopic responses. In materials science, this approach helps predict properties of novel materials and optimize composite structures by linking micro- and macro-mechanics [1, 5]. For biological systems, it offers insights into cancer progression, integrating molecular to organ-level interactions [2], and characterizes the nonlinear mechanics of soft tissues like skin or organs [4]. The utility extends to micro- and nanofluidics, where it combines atomistic simulations with continuum models to capture critical phenomena [3]. It also enhances understanding of electrochemical systems by integrating approaches from atomistic to continuum scales to analyze electrode reactions and device performance [9]. Multiscale modeling is crucial for predicting battery degradation pathways, leading to more durable energy storage [6]. In advanced manufacturing, particularly 3D printing, it helps optimize processes by predicting distortion and microstructure evolution [8]. Even in public health, this method provides a nuanced view of infectious disease dynamics, integrating individual behaviors with population-wide spread [7]. What this really means is that multiscale modeling is a fundamental strategy for tackling intricate problems where interactions across scales are paramount, enabling more accurate predictions, optimized designs, and informed decision-making across a broad spectrum of applications, including fluid-structure interactions [10].

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Dong WL, Seong HK, Jong HL. "Multiscale modeling in materials science: Recent advances and future perspectives".J. Mater. Res. 38 (2023):2933-2947.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Alexander RAA, John PW, Raymond HJD. "Multiscale modeling of cancer progression and treatment".Cancer Res. 81 (2021):3173-3183.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Se-Yeon K, Hyun-Seok H, Jin-Soo K. "Multiscale computational fluid dynamics for micro- and nanofluidics".J. Comput. Phys. 450 (2022):110757.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Elisabetta BPA, Alisya BCA, Can ACA. "Multiscale modeling of soft biological tissues: A review".J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 114 (2020):103986.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Sung SK, Jin HP, Young SL. "Multiscale modeling of composite materials: Bridging micro- and macro-mechanics".Compos. Sci. Technol. 247 (2023):110190.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Xin L, Yu Z, Qi S. "Multiscale modeling of battery degradation: From atomistic to cell level".J. Power Sources 554 (2022):231267.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Maryam A, John PS, Peter RJ. "Multiscale modeling of infectious disease dynamics".Epidemics 37 (2021):100473.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Guoyou Z, Jian S, Kai Z. "Multiscale modeling of additive manufacturing processes".Addit. Manuf. 76 (2023):103448.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Martin ZB, Yuen WL, Xing ZL. "Multiscale modeling of electrochemical systems".Electrochim. Acta 363 (2020):136453.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Benjamin GVdV, Marten HWVE, Annelies WCVdH. "Multiscale modeling of fluid-structure interaction".J. Fluid Mech. 935 (2022):A42.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref