GET THE APP

Handling Bisphenol A Pollution: Progress in Elimination Techniques and Upcoming Opportunities
..

Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques

ISSN: 2155-9821

Open Access

Short Communication - (2023) Volume 13, Issue 5

Handling Bisphenol A Pollution: Progress in Elimination Techniques and Upcoming Opportunities

Hasami Abbu*
*Correspondence: Hasami Abbu, Department of Bioprocess Engineering, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selango, Malaysia, Email:
Department of Bioprocess Engineering, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selango, Malaysia

Received: 28-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. jbpbt-23-116678; Editor assigned: 30-Aug-2023, Pre QC No. P-116678; Reviewed: 12-Sep-2023, QC No. Q-116678; Revised: 19-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. R-116678; Published: 28-Sep-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2155-9821.2023.13.592
Citation: Abbu, Hasami. “Handling Bisphenol A Pollution: Progress in Elimination Techniques and Upcoming Opportunities.” J Bioprocess Biotech 13 (2023): 592.
Copyright: © 2023 Abbu H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical compound used in the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. It has been a subject of concern due to its widespread presence in everyday products and its potential adverse health effects. BPA pollution, stemming from the release of this compound into the environment, has become a significant environmental and public health issue. This article delves into the progress made in eliminating BPA pollution, the techniques and methods employed for its removal, and the upcoming opportunities and challenges in this endeavor. BPA is a synthetic chemical compound that has been widely used in various industries for decades. It is found in many consumer products, such as plastic food and beverage containers, thermal paper receipts, dental sealants, and the lining of canned foods. BPA has been utilized for its desirable properties, including its ability to make plastics transparent and durable. However, its ubiquity in these products and its potential health risks have raised concerns [1].

The health concerns associated with BPA arise from its endocrinedisrupting properties. BPA can mimic estrogen, a hormone that plays a crucial role in various bodily functions. Exposure to BPA has been linked to a range of health issues, including developmental problems in children, reproductive disorders, and an increased risk of chronic diseases, such as cancer, obesity, and diabetes. Consequently, the need to reduce BPA exposure has led to heightened awareness of its presence in the environment and the search for effective elimination techniques. Efforts to reduce BPA pollution have been ongoing for many years, resulting in significant progress. Regulatory authorities in various countries have taken significant steps to limit BPA's presence in consumer products. For instance, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) banned the use of BPA in baby bottles, sippy cups, and infant formula packaging in 2012. Similarly, the European Union has imposed restrictions on BPA use in certain products, such as baby bottles. These regulations have helped reduce BPA exposure, especially among vulnerable populations like infants and young children. However, BPA is still used in many other products, and its presence in the environment remains a concern [2-4].

Description

One approach to reducing BPA pollution is to replace it with alternative chemicals that are less harmful. This has led to the development of BPA-free plastics and coatings. Manufacturers have sought to find substitutes that provide similar product characteristics without the health risks associated with BPA. While these alternatives have gained popularity, they are not without their own set of challenges. Some studies have raised concerns about the safety of BPA substitutes, as limited information is available about their longterm effects. Within industries that have traditionally used BPA, there have been efforts to improve manufacturing processes and reduce the leaching of BPA into products. This includes refining the production of epoxy resins and polycarbonate plastics to minimize BPA content. Such improvements have contributed to a decrease in BPA exposure. Beyond efforts to reduce BPA use in consumer products, there have been attempts to address the existing environmental pollution caused by BPA. Cleanup efforts have primarily focused on contaminated water sources, where BPA can be found due to its release from industrial processes, landfills, and sewage.

While regulatory measures and industry initiatives have played a crucial role in reducing BPA pollution, the need for effective elimination techniques remains. Several methods have been developed and implemented to remove BPA from the environment. These techniques can be broadly categorized into physical, chemical, and biological methods. Adsorption is a physical process that involves the binding of BPA molecules to a solid material, known as an adsorbent. Activated carbon is a commonly used adsorbent for removing BPA from water. It has a high surface area, making it effective in capturing BPA molecules through chemical interactions. Adsorption is considered an efficient method for BPA removal from contaminated water sources. Filtration is another physical method for removing BPA from water. Membrane filtration processes, such as ultrafiltration and nanofiltration, can effectively separate BPA molecules from water based on their size and charge. These processes are particularly useful in water treatment plants and industrial settings.

Chemical oxidation involves the use of oxidizing agents to break down BPA molecules into less harmful compounds. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) combine chemicals like ozone, hydrogen peroxide, or UV light to degrade BPA. These methods are efficient at transforming BPA into non-toxic substances. Chemical precipitation methods involve adding chemicals to water to form solid precipitates with BPA. This process removes BPA from the water by settling it as a solid. Common chemicals used for precipitation include calcium hydroxide and ferric chloride. Biodegradation is a natural process that involves the breakdown of organic compounds by microorganisms. Some bacteria and fungi have been found to be capable of metabolizing BPA. Bioaugmentation, a technique involving the introduction of specialized microorganisms to contaminated sites, can accelerate the biodegradation of BPA [5].

Conclusion

Phytoremediation uses plants to remove contaminants from the environment. Certain plant species have been shown to absorb and accumulate BPA from soil and water. This method is particularly useful for addressing BPA contamination in agricultural areas or natural environments. As the global community continues to grapple with BPA pollution, one opportunity lies in the development of environmentally friendly and sustainable BPA removal methods. Researchers are exploring green technologies that have minimal ecological impact, such as using plant-based adsorbents and harnessing solar energy for AOPs. Nanotechnology offers exciting possibilities for improving BPA removal techniques. Nanomaterials, such as nanoparticles and nanocomposites, can enhance the adsorption and catalytic properties of materials used for BPA elimination. These materials are being investigated for their potential to efficiently remove BPA from water and other environmental matrices. Advancements in analytical chemistry have made it easier to detect and monitor BPA levels in the environment. The development of more sensitive and accurate detection methods allows for better tracking of BPA contamination and the effectiveness of elimination techniques. Cleaning up legacy contamination is a challenging and costly endeavor, and finding effective methods for addressing these older sources of pollution is essential. Enforcing regulations and ensuring that industries comply with restrictions on BPA use remains a challenge. In some regions, regulations may be lax, and enforcement can be limited, allowing for continued BPA pollution.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

  1. Almeida, Susana, António Raposo, Maira Almeida‐González and Conrado Carrascosa. "Bisphenol A: Food exposure and impact on human health." Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 17 (2018): 1503-1517.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Im, Jeongdae and Frank E. Löffler. "Fate of bisphenol A in terrestrial and aquatic environments." Environ Sci Technol 50 (2016): 8403-8416.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Wang, Qiang, Meng Chen, Guoqiang Shan and Pengyu Chen, et al. "Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of emerging bisphenol analogues in aquatic organisms from Taihu Lake, China." Sci Total Environ 598 (2017): 814-820.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Adeyi, Adebola A. and Babafemi A. Babalola. "Bisphenol-A (BPA) in foods commonly consumed in Southwest Nigeria and its human health risk." Sci Rep (2019): 17458.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Gys, Celine, Michiel Bastiaensen, Liesbeth Bruckers and Ann Colles, et al. "Determinants of exposure levels of bisphenols in flemish adolescents." Environ Res 193 (2021): 110567.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 3351

Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques received 3351 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward

https://sekillinickyazma.com.tr/

pinbahis