Entropy and its Impact on Economic Reliability in Onshore and Offshore Wind Power

Sandra Blanco^*
*Correspondence: Sandra Blanco, Department of Economics, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands, Email:

Introducción

As the global energy sector shifts from fossil fuels to renewables, wind energy has emerged as one of the most promising sources of sustainable electricity. Among the two main modalities of wind energy generation onshore and offshore there is growing interest in not only their environmental benefits but also their operational reliability and economic performance. However, the inherent variability of wind, influenced by atmospheric conditions and geographic location, introduces significant uncertainty in energy generation. One way to quantify and analyze this uncertainty is through the concept of entropy, which in this context measures the randomness or disorder in wind speed and power output. Entropy-based metrics have gained importance in recent years as they provide a statistical framework for evaluating the predictability and stability of renewable energy systems. For wind power, higher entropy indicates greater unpredictability, which can have direct implications on grid stability, energy market prices, investment risks, and long-term economic reliability. This paper explores the role of entropy in analyzing the uncertainty associated with onshore and offshore wind power generation and investigates how this entropy-driven uncertainty affects the economic reliability of these systems from a policy, planning, and operational perspective [1].

Description

Entropy-based uncertainty analysis provides an insightful tool for assessing wind power variability, and its economic implications become especially relevant when comparing onshore and offshore wind systems. Onshore wind farms are generally easier to install and maintain, with lower upfront capital costs. However, they are often subjected to more variable wind patterns due to topographical obstructions and land-based atmospheric interference, leading to higher entropy in power output. Offshore wind farms, while significantly more expensive to install and maintain due to their location and harsh marine environments, typically benefit from stronger and more consistent wind flows, which translate to lower entropy values. This contrast becomes critical when modeling energy production forecasts, power purchase agreements, and return-on-investment projections. High entropy in onshore systems can result in greater forecasting errors, increased reliance on energy storage or supplementary power sources, and volatile revenue streams for operators. In contrast, the lower entropy of offshore systems often leads to more predictable outputs, which are economically favorable despite their higher capital costs [2].

Entropy also impacts capacity planning, grid integration, and energy trading. Markets increasingly rely on real-time pricing, and the ability to reliably deliver power during peak demand periods something that lower-entropy systems are better equipped to do can yield economic advantages. From a systems-level perspective, incorporating entropy analysis helps utilities and regulators design more robust energy portfolios, minimize supply shocks, and stabilize tariffs. Additionally, policies that account for entropy-related risks may be better suited to allocate subsidies or prioritize investments, ensuring that both environmental goals and financial sustainability are achieved. The application of entropy in the context of wind energy primarily serves as a means to quantify the degree of uncertainty and randomness in wind speed and power output, which are critical parameters for effective energy planning and policy formulation. Entropy, a concept originally rooted in thermodynamics and information theory, has found increasing use in renewable energy research for evaluating the complexity, intermittency, and reliability of power systems [3].

For wind power systems, high entropy values generally indicate greater irregularity and unpredictability in wind patterns, which complicates forecasting models, power scheduling, and grid stability. By contrast, low entropy suggests more regular and consistent patterns, which are easier to manage economically and technically. When applied to the comparison between onshore and offshore wind farms, entropy becomes a decisive metric that goes beyond capacity factors or average output, enabling a nuanced understanding of performance risk and economic reliability. Onshore wind power, while widely deployed due to its lower initial costs and accessibility, is subject to considerable variability in wind conditions. Factors such as terrain roughness, buildings, vegetation, and local meteorological patterns contribute to significant short-term and long-term fluctuations in wind speed. These fluctuations lead to frequent ramp-up and ramp-down cycles in power generation, increasing mechanical wear and introducing complications in grid integration. The higher entropy in onshore wind patterns results in greater uncertainty in production forecasting, which directly impacts financial projections for energy suppliers and investors [4].

For instance, energy traders rely on accurate predictions to bid in electricity markets; if wind generation cannot be reliably forecasted, it increases the risk of market imbalance charges or forces reliance on backup energy sources. This uncertainty affects investment attractiveness and long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs), as financial institutions typically favor predictable cash flows and low-risk scenarios. Offshore wind systems, while facing their own set of engineering challenges, benefit from significantly more stable wind conditions due to the relatively smooth ocean surface and fewer geographical obstacles. As a result, the entropy levels associated with offshore wind speed and energy output are typically lower than those of onshore systems. This relative stability leads to more accurate generation forecasts and improved grid compliance. Moreover, offshore turbines are often larger and designed to capture more energy at higher altitudes, further enhancing their efficiency and predictability. Although Capital Expenditures (CAPEX) and Operational Expenditures (OPEX) are higher for offshore projects due to installation complexity, marine logistics, and maintenance access these are partially offset by the lower entropy and higher capacity utilization rates. From an economic reliability standpoint, offshore wind may offer more secure returns over time, despite its higher upfront costs [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, entropy plays a vital role in understanding and managing the uncertainty inherent in wind power generation, and its impact on the economic reliability of onshore and offshore systems is both measurable and actionable. While onshore wind energy continues to dominate in terms of installed capacity due to cost and accessibility, its higher entropy values point to challenges in predictability, economic planning, and system reliability. Offshore wind, with its relatively lower entropy and more stable generation patterns, offers better prospects for long-term economic reliability, albeit at the expense of higher initial investment and maintenance costs. The trade-off between predictability and expense must be carefully balanced through advanced modeling, risk assessment, and policy frameworks that integrate entropy metrics. Future energy strategies should therefore incorporate entropy-based analyses as part of standard project evaluation tools to ensure that the renewable energy transition is not only environmentally responsible but also economically sustainable. By addressing the entropic nature of wind variability head-on, stakeholders including engineers, economists, and policymakers can make informed decisions that enhance the performance and reliability of wind power infrastructures while optimizing their financial viability in an increasingly decarbonized global economy.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Ndetei, David M., Francisa A. Ongecha-Owuor, Lincoln Khasakhala and Victoria Mutiso, et al. "Traumatic experiences of Kenyan secondary school students." Child Adolesc Ment Health J 19 (2007): 147-155.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

2. Atwoli, Lukoye. "Post traumatic stress disorder among Mau Mau concentration camp survivors in Kenya." PhD diss University of Nairobi (2006).

 Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

3. Pham, Phuong N., Harvey M. Weinstein and Timothy Longman. "Trauma and PTSD symptoms in Rwanda: Implications for attitudes toward justice and reconciliation." Jama 292 (2004): 602-612.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

4. Neuner, Frank, Maggie Schauer, Unni Karunakara and Christine Klaschik, et al. "Psychological trauma and evidence for enhanced vulnerability for posttraumatic stress disorder through previous trauma among West Nile refugees." BMC Psychiatry 4 (2004): 1-7.

 Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

5. Atwoli, Lukoye, Dan J. Stein, David R. Williams and Katie A. Mclaughlin, et al. "Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in South Africa: Analysis from the South African Stress and Health Study." BMC Psychiatry 13 (2013): 1-12.

 Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at