Eco Friendly Biomass Conversion Disinfection Approaches

Tanja Dominko^*
*Correspondence: Tanja Dominko, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, Email:

Introduction

Increased reliance on fuels made from petroleum and growing urbanisation have intensified environmental issues related to greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere. Lignocellulosic feedstock is the starting point for the synthesis of sustainable biofuels and other fine chemicals at an integrated biorefinery. The efficient replacement of petrochemical products with lignocellulosic biomass derived from agricultural feedstocks would considerably help the sustainable bioeconomy and the biorefinery sector. To fully utilise the potential of biorefinery, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, and other extractives that are crucial parts of lignocellulosic biomass must be separated or upgraded into usable forms. An effective bioprocess requires the development of low-cost, environmentally friendly pre-treatment technologies with effective biomass deconstruction potential [1].

An significant increase in pollution and a quicker depletion of energy supplies are both results of socioeconomic development and population growth around the world. The overuse of conventional fossil fuels, which greatly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, acid rain, and other adverse climate effects, is the main cause of the current global energy crisis and environmental deterioration. Therefore, it is crucial to make long-lasting technical advancements to meet the planet's increasing demand for energy without endangering its limited resources. Reusing and recovering resources is currently taking the place of the paradigm of "take, make, and dispose" in order to achieve socioeconomic success and "healthy persons and a healthy climate [2].

A system called biorefinery combines numerous conversion processes, including biochemical, thermochemical, and microbial growth, to produce energy, chemicals, biofuels, and other high-value industrial goods from LCB. However, there are numerous significant challenges associated with the fullscale bioconversion of LCB to bioenergy/biofuels (biodiesel, bioethanol, and biobutanol), as well as biobased commodities (chemicals, feed, and food). These challenges relate to the overall process' energy input and product yield. A hetero-polysaccharide complex called LCB is made up of a range of polymers, including cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, as well as other polar and non-polar materials. The structural polysaccharides of LCB are intricately entangled with lignin blocks, giving the biomass structure a high degree of stiffness and recalcitrance. Consequently, a significant bottleneck in the LCB's value as a source of energy, fuel, or other resources.

Physical, chemical, physicochemical, and biological approaches can be used as the main pretreatment regimes for LCB fractionation. However, the majority of these techniques have a number of drawbacks, like being expensive, not being "green," producing inhibitors or hazardous compounds, and many others. To create viable LCB fuel technology, research is now concentrated on the creation of cost-effective and environmentally friendly pretreatment techniques. Depending on the type of biomass, its structural characteristics, composition, and level of polymerization, the best pretreatment method must be chosen. Pretreatment has a considerable impact on the overall economy of a bioprocess because it is the most capital-intensive phase in the LCB biorefinery [3].

Description

Enzymatic saccharification of adequately prepared biomass is a vital stage in the chain of LCB fuel solutions. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose fibres results from the cooperative action of cellulases (endo- 1,4-glucanase, cellobiohydrolase, and -glucosidase) and hemicellulases (xylanases, glucuronidase, glucomannanase, galactomannanase, -xylosidase, and acetyleste Because they hydrolyze the polysaccharides and remove lignin, lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs), manganese peroxidase, and laccases are currently used for enzymatic saccharification. This improves the efficiency of the process by increasing the glucose yield and reducing the amount of cellulases. However, the procedure for producing biofuel is significantly hindered by the high sensitivity, high cost, low stability, and high dosage of the enzymes. Therefore, innovative methods including on-site enzyme manufacturing, the use of enzyme cocktails, and enzyme [4].

The idea of a biorefinery was developed to increase the production of green fuels and to provide commercial value. A biorefinery is a core structure created for the use of raw biomass, where all processing techniques are combined in a methodical way to create products with a sustainable bio-based base. The development of a circular bioeconomy that is knowledge-driven and environmentally responsible depends on the biorefineries. The lignocellulosic biomass used as a feedstock plays a crucial role in the manufacture of both bioproducts and the energy required to power them. The circular bioeconomy concept emphasises the recovery of all goods from resources without any waste being released.

The major obstacle to 2G biorefining is the lignocellulosic biomass's highly complex and resistant structure. The LCB biopolymers (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) are interwoven to form a matrix that resists various microbial and enzymatic digestions. The biomass's porosity, the presence of proteins, and the presence of acetyl groups are among the other factors that influence how recalcitrant it is. The extraction of monomeric sugars to make biopolymers, biofuels, and biochemicals requires fractionation of lignocellulosic components. A crucial stage in a biorefinery is the pretreatment of LCB, which improves the permeability and surface area of polysaccharides for enzymatic hydrolysis and facilitates the efficient disintegration of biomass. In order to minimise biomass crystallinity, increase porosity, eliminate lignin, limit the development of inhibitors, prevent sugar degradation, and need less energy input, a pretreatment is desirable.

Physical pretreatment methods essentially seek to reduce LCB particle size and improve polysaccharide surface accessibility. The lignocellulosic biomass is destroyed using a variety of pretreatment techniques, including mechanical treatment (chipping, milling, and/or grinding), freezing, pyrolysis, microwave irradiation, pulsed electric field, ultrasonication, and torrefaction. However, the majority of these techniques demand expensive processing equipment, a lot of energy, and the creation of dangerous chemical compounds. As a result, they are viewed as less desirable for use on an industrial scale. However, a number of techniques like as ultrasound and microwave irradiation have been found to be quite effective in dissolving cellulose and lignin from lignocellulosic feedstock [5].

Conclusion

By converting lignocellulosic biomass and its component parts into valueadded products and improved energy, the concept of lignocellulosic biorefinery is established. The most crucial prerequisite for the production of sustainable and renewable energy is the introduction of low-cost, process-efficient technology. It reduces carbon emissions while while minimising adverse environmental effects. This review includes comprehensive information on the lignocellulosic biomass, processing methods, benefits, drawbacks, and difficulties of a biorefinery. A sustainable and environmentally acceptable method for valuing lignocellulosic biomass through efficient and sustainable processes must be developed in order for forest-based biorefineries to be integrated into industrial supply chains.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest by author.

References

1. Hu, Jin, Fei Yu and Yongwu Lu. "Application of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis in biomass to liquid conversion." Catalysts 2 (2012): 303-326.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Asadullah, Mohammad. "Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review." Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 29 (2014): 201-215.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Asadullah, Mohammad. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review." Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 40 (2014): 118-132.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Kumar, Ramesh, Alak Kumar Ghosh and Parimal Pal. "Synergy of biofuel production with waste remediation along with value-added co-products recovery through microalgae cultivation: A review of membrane-integrated green approach." Sci Total Environ 698 (2020): 134169.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Damartzis, Th and A. Zabaniotou. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design—A review." Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15 (2011): 366-378.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at