Brief Report - (2025) Volume 16, Issue 2
Received: 01-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. bej-25-168179;
Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025, Pre QC No. P-168179;
Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025, QC No. Q-168179;
Revised: 22-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. R-168179;
Published:
29-Mar-2025
, DOI: 10.37421/2161-6219.2025.16.542
Citation: Tremblay, Brooklyn. “Benchmarking Renewable Energy Systems using DEA Methodology.” Bus Econ J 16 (2025): 542.
Copyright: © 2025 Tremblay B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The DEA methodology operates by constructing an efficient frontier composed of the best-performing DMUs based on input-output analysis. Inputs typically include capital investment, land use, labor and operational costs, while outputs might measure generated electricity, emission reductions, or overall energy conversion efficiency. A DEA model input-oriented or output-oriented then determines how efficiently each unit converts its resources into desired results. In the context of renewable energy systems, DEA has been employed to benchmark various technologies across countries or regions, revealing which energy systems are maximizing performance under similar resource conditions. For instance, a solar farm in Germany and a similar facility in India may be compared not only in terms of kilowatt-hours generated but also their land efficiency, cost-effectiveness and carbon footprint. These evaluations help stakeholders pinpoint inefficiencies and adopt innovations from top performers, whether through better technology integration, improved management, or optimized policy support.
In practice, DEA enables comparative analysis across time periods (static or dynamic models), accommodating environmental and operational variables. For example, dynamic DEA models are used to assess how renewable systems evolve over time with technological progress and policy shifts. Researchers and government agencies often use DEA to inform investment decisions, prioritize R&D funding and design performance-based incentive mechanisms. Moreover, hybrid approaches that combine DEA with other tools like Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), or machine learning enhance its predictive power and practical relevance. The growing availability of high-resolution energy data has further expanded DEAâ??s utility, allowing for more accurate and localized benchmarking of microgrids, rural energy systems and off-grid renewable solutions. Thus, DEA is not only a benchmarking tool but also a strategic framework to support the global transition toward sustainable energy futures [2].
Business and Economics Journal received 6451 citations as per Google Scholar report