GET THE APP

An Overview of the Expert of Cellulose Fiber Product Packaging
..

Biosensors & Bioelectronics

ISSN: 2155-6210

Open Access

Perspective - (2022) Volume 13, Issue 9

An Overview of the Expert of Cellulose Fiber Product Packaging

Lin Y*
*Correspondence: Lin Y, Department of Chemical Engineering, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, USA, Email:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, USA

Received: 14-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. jbsbe-22-76387; Editor assigned: 19-Sep-2022, Pre QC No. P-76387; Reviewed: 26-Sep-2022, QC No. Q-76387; Revised: 29-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. R-76387; Published: 03-Oct-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2155-6210.2022.13.350
Citation: Lin, Yuehe. “An Overview of the Expert of Cellulose fiber Product Packaging." J Biosens Bioelectron 13 (2022): 350.
Copyright: © 2022 Lin Y. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Packaging trash contributes significantly to municipal solid waste production. Container and package trash accounted for 74.8 million tonnes in the United States in 2003, 56.3 million tonnes in Europe in 2005, and 3.3 million tonnes in Australia in 2004. Currently, landfill is the most common form of packaging waste disposal in the United States, followed by recycling, incineration, and composting. However, landfilling emits greenhouse gases and consumes and may pollute land that may be utilised in the future. As a result, recovery strategies such as recycling or composting may be preferable methods of disposing of packaging trash. Steel, aluminium, glass, paper, paperboard, plastics, and wood are all popular packaging materials that may be recovered successfully.

About the Study

Composting is a natural process in which organic waste decomposes into a soil-like substance known as humus, which acts as a soil conditioner. Microorganisms such as bacteria, fungus, and actinomycetes are primarily responsible for decomposition. These bacteria feed on organic materials, emit CO2, and create humus as an end product. This natural process necessitates the presence of carbon, nitrogen, water, and oxygen. Microorganisms use carbon as an energy source and nitrogen to produce cell structures. A carbonto- nitrogen ratio of 30:1 is good for thermophilic microbe proliferation and speeds up the composting process.

A composting process consists of two major stages: active composting and curing. In the first stage, the temperature increases and remains raised as long as oxygen is present, resulting in intense microbial activity. The temperature drops later on, but the materials continue to compost at a slower rate. The composting process does not come to an end; rather, it continues slowly until the last residual nutrients are devoured by the surviving microbes and practically all of the carbon has been transformed to carbon dioxide.

Aerobic composting occurs in the presence of oxygen; if oxygen is not present, the process switches to anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic digestion is a naturally occurring breakdown and decay process in which organic matter degrades into basic chemical components, yielding biogas and digestate. Biogas is a gas combination mostly composed of methane, which may be used to generate heat and power, and carbon dioxide. The digestate, like humus, can be utilised as a soil supplement in applications such as farming or landscaping.

Because various microorganisms are active, the quality of compost generated under aerobic settings differs from that produced under anaerobic digestion conditions. Because of impurities that are difficult to remove and may cause issues in recycling, the majority of packaging materials used for food and medical packaging applications are disposed of through landfill. In 2003, 11.9 million tonnes of plastic packaging were produced in the United States, with just 1.06 million tonnes recovered through recycling. Composting is a practical method of reusing waste packaging by returning them to nature.

A biodegradable plastic, according to the American Society for Testing and Materials, is one that dissolves due to the activity of naturally occurring microorganisms such as bacteria, fungus, and algae. There is a distinction between biodegradable and compostable plastic. A compostable plastic is one that degrades biologically during composting to produce carbon dioxide, water, inorganic compounds, and biomass at a pace commensurate with other known compostable materials while leaving no visibly recognisable or harmful leftovers. As a result, while all compostable polymers are biodegradable, the opposite is not true.

Plastic biodegradability is affected by both the environment in which they are put and the chemical makeup of the polymer. Biodegradation is an enzymatic process; therefore it is extremely particular to the polymer's chemical structures and linkages. Polymer biodegradation occurs via many methods. Hydrolysis is a frequent process in which random non-enzymatic chain scission of ester groups results in a decrease in molecular weight. The velocity of water diffusion through the polymer influences the hydrolysis process [1-5].

Conclusion

As previously stated, the biodegradation of plastics is affected by both environmental variables and the chemical structure of the polymer. The backbone of biodegradable polymers often contains ester, amide, or carbonate hydrolyzable linkages. The presence of these hydrolyzable functional groups makes the compound more susceptible to biodegradation. Crystallinity, molecular weight, and, in the case of copolymers, copolymer composition are further characteristics that influence biodegradability.

References

  1. Figge, Frank H.J. "Cosmic radiation and cancer." Science 105 (1947): 323-325.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Atri, Dimitra and Adrian L. Melott. "Cosmic rays and terrestrial life: A brief review." Astropart. Phys 53 (2014): 186-190.
  4. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  5. Mortazavi, S.M., J.R. Cameron and A. Niroomand-Rad. "Is the adaptive response an efficient protection against the detrimental effects of space radiation." In Inter Cos Ray Conf 7 (2003): 4299.
  6. Google Scholar   

  7. Furukawa, Satoshi, Aiko Nagamatsu, Mitsuru Nenoi, and Akira Fujimori, et al. "Space radiation biology for “Living in Space”." Bio Med Res Inter (2020).
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Belli, Mauro and Luca Indovina. "The response of living organisms to low radiation environment and its implications in radiation protection." Front in Public Health 8 (2020): 601711.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1751

Biosensors & Bioelectronics received 1751 citations as per Google Scholar report

Biosensors & Bioelectronics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward