Commentary - (2025) Volume 11, Issue 2
Received: 01-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. abp-25-165742;
Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2025, Pre QC No. P-165742;
Reviewed: 15-Apr-2025, QC No. Q-165742;
Revised: 22-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. R-165742;
Published:
29-Apr-2025
, DOI: 10.37421/2472-0496.2025.11.312
Citation: Swinal, Ruchi. "When the Mind Diverges: Diagnosing and Treating Abnormal Behavior." Abnorm Behav Psychol 11 (2025): 312.
Copyright: © 2025 Swinal R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The study of abnormal behavior has fascinated psychologists, psychiatrists, and medical professionals for centuries, as it touches on the complexities of the human mind and the difficulties people face when their thoughts, emotions, or behaviors deviate from what is considered typical or socially acceptable. Abnormal behavior is a term used to describe patterns of thoughts, emotions, or actions that are atypical, distressing, or dysfunctional, often leading to impairment in an individualâ??s ability to function in everyday life. The vast range of behaviors classified as abnormal includes conditions such as anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, eating disorders, and various forms of addiction. Understanding and diagnosing abnormal behavior involves not only recognizing deviations from societal norms but also exploring the underlying causes and providing appropriate treatments to help individuals manage or overcome these challenges. The complexity of abnormal behavior demands a nuanced approach that takes into account the intricate interplay of genetic, biological, psychological, and environmental factors, all of which contribute to the development and persistence of mental health disorders. Abnormal behavior is inherently difficult to define in a universal sense because what is considered "normal" varies widely across cultures and societies. Behaviors that might be seen as abnormal in one culture can be regarded as perfectly acceptable or even desirable in another [2].
Traditionally, mental health professionals have used various models and frameworks to diagnose abnormal behavior. The medical model is one of the most widely used approaches in diagnosing mental illness. This model views psychological disorders as diseases that have identifiable causes and symptoms, often with a biological basis. In this context, abnormal behavior is seen as the result of underlying physical or biological factors such as genetic predispositions, chemical imbalances in the brain, or structural abnormalities in brain functioning. The medical model is particularly influential in psychiatry, where mental health conditions are often diagnosed based on a set of criteria outlined in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The DSM provides a standardized classification system for mental disorders, outlining specific symptoms and diagnostic criteria for various conditions, ranging from mood disorders and anxiety disorders to psychotic disorders and personality disorders. While the medical model has been instrumental in helping to identify and categorize mental disorders, it has also faced criticism for oversimplifying the complexities of human behavior. Critics argue that by focusing exclusively on biological factors, the medical model neglects the psychological, social, and environmental influences that contribute to mental illness [3].
The psychodynamic model, which originated with the work of Sigmund Freud, posits that abnormal behavior is the result of unconscious conflicts, often rooted in early childhood experiences. According to this view, individuals may develop psychological disorders as a way of coping with repressed memories or unresolved conflicts between different parts of the psyche, such as the id, ego, and superego. For instance, a person who experiences traumatic events during childhood may suppress these memories and develop symptoms such as anxiety or depression as a result. The psychodynamic model emphasizes the importance of exploring unconscious processes and gaining insight into past experiences as a way of understanding and addressing abnormal behavior. Techniques such as free association, dream analysis, and transference are commonly used in psychodynamic therapy to help individuals uncover repressed memories and conflicts that may be influencing their current behavior. While the psychodynamic model has been influential in the field of psychotherapy, it has been criticized for its lack of empirical evidence and its reliance on subjective interpretations of unconscious processes. Many of the concepts put forth by Freud and his followers are difficult to measure or test scientifically, which has led some critics to question their validity. Additionally, the psychodynamic model tends to focus heavily on the past and unconscious influences, which some argue can be limiting in addressing present-day concerns or practical coping strategies for individuals struggling with mental health issues [4].
In contrast to the psychodynamic model, the cognitive-behavioral model focuses on the role of thoughts, beliefs, and behaviors in the development and maintenance of abnormal behavior. According to this model, abnormal behavior is often the result of distorted or maladaptive thinking patterns, which lead individuals to misinterpret or react inappropriately to situations. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is based on the premise that by identifying and challenging these negative thought patterns, individuals can learn healthier ways of thinking and behaving. For example, a person with generalized anxiety disorder may experience excessive worry and irrational thoughts about potential dangers, even in save situations. Through CBT, the individual can learn to recognize and reframe these thoughts, thereby reducing their anxiety and improving their overall functioning. Additionally, while CBT has been shown to be effective for many individuals, it may not be suitable for everyone, particularly those with more complex or severe mental health conditions. A supportive environment can help individuals cope with stress and adversity, while a lack of support can contribute to feelings of helplessness and hopelessness, leading to the development of abnormal behavior [5].
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Abnormal and Behavioural Psychology received 361 citations as per Google Scholar report