GET THE APP

Use of NMR and MS-Based Metabolomics in Clinical Biomarker Discovery
Metabolomics:Open Access

Metabolomics:Open Access

ISSN: 2153-0769

Open Access

Short Communication - (2025) Volume 15, Issue 1

Use of NMR and MS-Based Metabolomics in Clinical Biomarker Discovery

Emma Bakker*
*Correspondence: Emma Bakker, Department of Integrative Biology and Metabolomics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Email:
Department of Integrative Biology and Metabolomics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Received: 01-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. jpdbd-25-169145; Editor assigned: 03-Mar-2025, Pre QC No. P-169145; Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025, QC No. Q-169145; Revised: 22-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. R-169145; Published: 31-Mar-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2153-0769.2025.15.412
Citation: Bakker, Emma. “Use of NMR and MS-Based Metabolomics in Clinical Biomarker Discovery.” Metabolomics 14 (2025): 412.
Copyright: © 2025 Bakker E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Mass Spectrometry (MS) are the two cornerstone technologies of metabolomics, offering complementary strengths for comprehensive metabolite identification and quantification in clinical biomarker discovery. As precision medicine gains traction, the demand for robust, reproducible, and non-invasive biomarkers to detect, monitor, and predict disease has surged. NMR and MS-based metabolomics allow for high-throughput and highly sensitive analysis of biofluids and tissues, capturing a broad spectrum of endogenous metabolites that reflect physiological and pathological states. Their application in clinical research is transforming how complex diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, and neurodegenerative conditions are understood and managed, making these platforms central to the future of individualized patient care.

Description

NMR spectroscopy, although less sensitive than MS, offers unparalleled reproducibility, minimal sample preparation, and the ability to quantify metabolites non-destructively. It is especially valuable in longitudinal studies and routine clinical settings where consistency is critical. NMR excels in analyzing biofluids such as plasma, serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, and is particularly adept at profiling lipoproteins and low-molecular-weight metabolites. Its quantitative capabilities and robustness make it ideal for identifying metabolic shifts associated with disease onset and progression. For example, in cardiovascular research, NMR has been used to measure lipoprotein subfractions and metabolite signatures that predict atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction risk with high accuracy.

On the other hand, MS-based metabolomics, typically coupled with chromatographic separation techniques like liquid chromatography (LC-MS) or gas chromatography (GC-MS), provides superior sensitivity and broader metabolite coverage. MS can detect metabolites at femtomolar concentrations and is particularly effective for profiling complex metabolic pathways, including those involving amino acids, organic acids, and lipids. This high-resolution capability allows for the detection of subtle biochemical changes that may serve as early indicators of diseases such as cancer or metabolic syndrome. Moreover, tandem MS (MS/MS) offers structural information, enabling the identification of novel biomarkers. In oncology, MS-based metabolomics has been instrumental in detecting cancer-specific metabolic signatures in tissue biopsies and biofluids, facilitating early diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

The integration of NMR and MS technologies enhances biomarker discovery by leveraging the strengths of both platformsâ??NMRâ??s reliability and MSâ??s sensitivity. Together, they provide a more complete metabolic profile, increasing the likelihood of identifying clinically relevant biomarkers. Advanced data processing tools and multivariate statistical models allow researchers to interpret large, complex datasets, uncovering patterns and correlations that would otherwise remain hidden. Furthermore, these technologies are increasingly integrated with other omics data, such as genomics and proteomics, within systems biology frameworks to better understand disease mechanisms and identify multi-parameter biomarker panels. Such comprehensive approaches hold promise for transforming diagnostics and personalizing treatment plans.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of NMR and MS-based metabolomics represents a powerful convergence of analytical precision and biological insight in clinical biomarker discovery. By enabling detailed, reproducible, and sensitive analysis of metabolic alterations in disease, these technologies contribute to the early detection, stratification, and monitoring of various health conditions. Their complementary nature provides a holistic view of the metabolome, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and supporting the development of targeted therapies. As metabolomic workflows become more standardized and integrated into clinical practice, NMR and MS will continue to shape the landscape of precision medicine, offering clinicians actionable insights and improving patient outcomes through molecular-level diagnostics.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Kikuchi, Jun and Shunji Yamada. "NMR window of molecular complexity showing homeostasis in superorganisms." Analyst142 (2017): 4161-4172.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

  1. Trivedi, Drupad K, Katherine A Hollywood and Royston Goodacre. "Metabolomics for the masses: The future of metabolomics in a personalized world." New Horiz Transl Med 3 (2017): 294-305.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 895

Metabolomics:Open Access received 895 citations as per Google Scholar report

Metabolomics:Open Access peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward