Tumor Biomarkers: Signposts in the Journey of Cancer Detection

Mariano Provencio^*
*Correspondence: Mariano Provencio, Department of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro–Majadahonda, Manuel de Falla 1, 28222 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, Email:

Keywords

Tumor biomarkers • Cancer detection • Chronotherapy

Introduction

Early detection and diagnosis

One of the primary roles of tumor biomarkers is in the early detection and diagnosis of cancer. Detecting cancer at an early stage significantly improves the chances of successful treatment and survival. Biomarkers such as Prostate- Specific Antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer, Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) for colorectal cancer, and CA-125 for ovarian cancer are commonly used in screening and diagnosing cancers. Elevated levels of these biomarkers can indicate the presence of cancer or the risk of developing cancer, prompting further diagnostic tests such as imaging studies and biopsies [1].

Prognostic indicators

Tumor biomarkers also serve as prognostic indicators, providing information about the likely course of the disease and the patient's overall outcome. For example, in breast cancer, the presence of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2/neu) overexpression is associated with a more aggressive form of the disease. HER2/neu testing helps oncologists assess the prognosis and tailor treatment strategies, such as targeted therapies like Herceptin, to improve outcomes [2].

Literature Review

Predictive markers for treatment response

Tumor biomarkers play a crucial role in predicting how a patient will respond to specific treatments. These predictive markers guide oncologists in choosing the most effective therapies, thereby maximizing treatment efficacy while minimizing unnecessary side effects. For instance, in lung cancer, the presence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations indicates a higher likelihood of responding to EGFR-targeted therapies like gefitinib and erlotinib. Personalized treatments based on biomarker analysis form the cornerstone of precision medicine, ensuring that patients receive therapies tailored to their unique genetic profiles [3].

Monitoring treatment response and relapse

During cancer treatment, monitoring the levels of specific biomarkers can offer insights into the effectiveness of the chosen therapy. A decrease in biomarker levels often indicates a positive response to treatment, whereas an increase or stabilization may signal the need for treatment adjustments or additional interventions. Additionally, biomarkers help in the early detection of cancer recurrence. Rising levels of certain biomarkers can serve as an early warning sign, enabling healthcare providers to intervene promptly and potentially improve the outcomes for recurrent cancer cases.

Liquid biopsies: Revolutionizing cancer diagnosis and monitoring

Traditionally, obtaining tumor tissue for biomarker analysis required invasive procedures such as biopsies. However, recent advancements in technology have given rise to liquid biopsies, a non-invasive method that analyzes circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or other biomarkers present in blood or other bodily fluids. Liquid biopsies offer a real-time view of tumor dynamics, allowing oncologists to monitor treatment response, detect minimal residual disease, and identify emerging resistance mechanisms. These tests revolutionize cancer diagnosis and monitoring, offering a more convenient and less invasive approach for patients while providing critical information for clinicians [4].

Challenges and future directions

While tumor biomarkers have transformed cancer diagnosis and treatment, challenges persist. Biomarker heterogeneity, where different regions of a tumor exhibit varying biomarker profiles, poses a significant obstacle. Single-cell sequencing technologies and spatial transcriptomics are emerging tools that enable researchers to dissect this complexity, providing a more comprehensive understanding of tumor biology. Additionally, the identification and validation of novel biomarkers remain areas of active research. Scientists are exploring innovative technologies, such as proteomics and metabolomics, to discover new biomarkers that can enhance the accuracy of cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment selection [5].

Discussion

The future of tumor biomarkers is intertwined with the rapidly evolving landscape of precision medicine. Integrating genomic, proteomic, and clinical data, alongside artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, enables the creation of comprehensive patient profiles. These profiles, rich in molecular insights, empower healthcare providers to make informed decisions, tailor treatments, and improve patient outcomes. As research continues to unravel the complexities of cancer biology, the discovery and utilization of novel biomarkers will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of cancer detection, treatment, and ultimately, patient survival. Cancer detection refers to the process of identifying the presence of cancer cells or tumors in the body. Early detection of cancer is critical because it can significantly improve treatment outcomes and increase the chances of successful recovery. There are various methods and technologies used in cancer detection, including screening tests, imaging techniques, and laboratory tests. Here are some key aspects of cancer detection:

Screening tests: Screening tests are performed on individuals who do not show any symptoms but are at higher risk for a specific type of cancer due to factors such as age, family history, or lifestyle choices. Common screening tests include mammograms for breast cancer, Pap smears for cervical cancer, colonoscopies for colorectal cancer, and PSA tests for prostate cancer. These tests aim to detect cancer at an early, more treatable stage.

Imaging techniques: Imaging technologies such as X-rays, CT scans, MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), ultrasound, and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scans are used to create detailed images of the inside of the body. These imaging techniques help identify the location, size, and extent of tumors, aiding in the diagnosis and staging of cancer. Advanced imaging methods allow healthcare professionals to visualize even small or deep-seated tumors.

Biopsy and pathology: A biopsy involves the removal of a small sample of tissue from a suspicious lump, mass, or abnormal area in the body. This tissue sample is then examined under a microscope by a pathologist, who can determine whether cancer cells are present. Different types of biopsies include needle biopsy, core biopsy, and surgical biopsy. The information from the biopsy helps in confirming the diagnosis and identifying the type and stage of cancer.

Blood tests and tumor markers: Blood tests can detect specific substances in the blood that might indicate the presence of cancer. Tumor markers are substances that are often found in higher-than-normal levels in the blood, urine, or tissues of cancer patients. Examples include PSA (Prostate- Specific Antigen) for prostate cancer and CA-125 for ovarian cancer. While these markers can be elevated in cancer, they are not definitive proof of the disease and are often used in conjunction with other diagnostic methods [6].

Liquid biopsies: Liquid biopsies involve analyzing cell-free DNA, RNA, or other molecules that are released by cancer cells into the bloodstream. These tests, also known as ctDNA tests, are non-invasive and can help detect genetic mutations or alterations associated with cancer. Liquid biopsies are particularly useful for monitoring treatment response, detecting minimal residual disease, and identifying potential drug resistance.

Conclusion

Despite significant advancements in cancer detection, challenges remain. Some cancers lack effective screening methods, leading to late-stage diagnoses. Additionally, the accuracy and availability of diagnostic tools vary globally, affecting timely detection in certain regions. The future of cancer detection holds promise. On-going research focuses on developing more accurate and sensitive screening tests, exploring innovative biomarkers, and integrating artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to enhance diagnostic capabilities. These advancements aim to make cancer detection more accessible, efficient, and precise, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing the burden of this devastating disease.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Van Herpe, Filip and Eric Van Cutsem. "The Role of cMET in Gastric Cancer-A Review of the Literature." Cancers 15 (2023): 1976.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Jie, Guang-Ling, Lun-Xi Peng, Mei-Mei Zheng and Hao Sun, et al. "Longitudinal Plasma Proteomics-Derived Biomarkers Predict Response to MET Inhibitors for MET-Dysregulated NSCLC." Cancers 15 (2023): 302.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Jørgensen, Jan Trøst and Jens Mollerup. "Companion diagnostics and predictive biomarkers for MET-targeted therapy in NSCLC." Cancers 14 (2022): 2150.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Dumitru, Claudia Alexandra, Eileen Brouwer, Tamina Stelzer and Salvatore Nocerino, et al. "Dynein light chain protein Tctex1: a novel prognostic marker and molecular mediator in glioblastoma." Cancers 13 (2021): 2624.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Sampl, Sandra, Sibylle Pramhas, Christian Stern and Matthias Preusser, et al. "Expression of telomeres in astrocytoma WHO grade 2 to 4: TERRA level correlates with telomere length, telomerase activity, and advanced clinical grade." Trans Oncol 5 (2012): 56-IN4.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Diman, Aurélie, Joanna Boros, Florian Poulain and Julie Rodriguez, et al. "Nuclear respiratory factor 1 and endurance exercise promote human telomere transcription." Sci Advanc 2 (2016): e1600031.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at