Opinion - (2025) Volume 8, Issue 1
Received: 01-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. jbr-25-168675;
Editor assigned: 03-Feb-2025, Pre QC No. P-168675;
Reviewed: 15-Feb-2025, QC No. Q-168675;
Revised: 20-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. R-168675;
Published:
28-Feb-2025
, DOI: 10.38421/2684-4583.2025.8.297
Citation: Moore, Benjamin. “Targeting Inflammation in the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epileptogenesis.” J Brain Res 8 (2025): 297.
Copyright: © 2025 Moore B. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The inflammatory response following an ischemic stroke is a complex and dynamic process that plays a dual role in brain repair and pathology. Immediately after a stroke, damaged neurons and glial cells release Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs), which activate resident immune cells like microglia and astrocytes. These cells produce pro-inflammatory mediators such as Inter Leukin-1β (IL-1β), Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) and Inter Leukin-6 (IL-6), creating an inflammatory microenvironment that disrupts the blood-brain barrier and recruits peripheral immune cells. This heightened inflammatory state alters neuronal excitability by modulating ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors and synaptic plasticity, laying the groundwork for epileptogenesis. For instance, IL-1β has been shown to enhance glutamatergic transmission and reduce GABAergic inhibition, promoting hyperexcitability in the post-stroke brain. Additionally, chronic inflammation can lead to persistent gliosis and neuronal circuit remodeling, further increasing seizure risk. Studies, such as those by Tröscher et al. (2021), have demonstrated that inflammation-mediated pathways are central to ischemic post-stroke epilepsy, suggesting that targeting these processes could interrupt epileptogenic progression. Experimental models have revealed that inhibiting specific inflammatory pathways, such as the IL-1β signaling cascade, reduces seizure frequency and severity, underscoring the therapeutic promise of anti-inflammatory interventions.
Building on this mechanistic insight, several anti-inflammatory strategies are being explored for the prevention and treatment of PSE. Pharmacological agents, such as IL-1 receptor antagonists (e.g., anakinra) and TNF-α inhibitors, have shown efficacy in preclinical models by attenuating neuroinflammation and reducing seizure susceptibility. Additionally, drugs targeting microglial activation, such as minocycline, have demonstrated potential in modulating the inflammatory response and protecting against epileptogenesis. Beyond traditional pharmaceuticals, emerging therapies like monoclonal antibodies and gene therapies aim to precisely target inflammatory mediators, offering greater specificity and fewer off-target effects. Non-pharmacological approaches, including ketogenic diets and vagus nerve stimulation, have also been investigated for their anti-inflammatory properties, with preliminary evidence suggesting they may reduce seizure risk in post-stroke patients. However, translating these findings into clinical practice remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of stroke patients, variability in inflammatory responses and the need for timely intervention to prevent irreversible epileptogenic changes. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatments in PSE, with a focus on identifying biomarkers such as elevated cytokine levels or neuroimaging signatures of inflammation that could guide personalized therapy. These advancements highlight the potential of inflammation-targeted treatments to not only manage seizures but also prevent the onset of epilepsy in at-risk stroke survivors [2].
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Journal of Brain Research received 2 citations as per Google Scholar report