Suicide: Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies

Natalia Ferreira^*
*Correspondence: Natalia Ferreira, Department of ehavioural Neuroscience, Universidade Federal do Litoral, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Email:

Introduction

Understanding the complex etiology and effective prevention of suicide attempts is a critical public health imperative. A significant body of research consistently identifies various risk factors, ranging from individual psychological vulnerabilities to broader societal influences and the efficacy of diverse interventions. One core area of investigation focuses on specific risk factors within vulnerable populations. For individuals diagnosed with severe mental illness, key risk factors for suicide attempts include a history of prior attempts, co-occurring substance use disorders, and elevated symptom severity. Recognizing these elements is essential for developing highly targeted and effective prevention strategies [1].

Similarly, the long-term risk of suicide attempts and death by suicide following an initial attempt is substantial, with a prior attempt serving as a powerful predictor for future incidents. This underscores the critical need for sustained, intensive follow-up care for individuals after a suicide attempt to mitigate recurrent risks [5].

Further emphasizing this immediate concern, studies also examine the incidence and specific risk factors for repeat suicide attempts in patients presenting to the emergency department. The findings highlight the importance of immediate and thorough risk assessment in emergency settings to identify those at high risk for subsequent attempts and facilitate appropriate interventions [6].

Beyond clinical presentations, theoretical frameworks also provide valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying suicide attempts. For example, the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide finds strong support through meta-analyses, which confirm that perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness are significant predictors of suicide attempts. This consolidation of evidence reinforces the theoryâ??s utility in understanding and identifying individuals at heightened risk, thereby guiding clinical assessments and interventions more effectively [3].

Behavioral and lifestyle factors also play a role in modulating suicide risk. Research indicates a complex association between physical activity and self-harm, including suicide attempts. Findings suggest that increased physical activity might serve as a protective factor, whereas sedentary behaviors could elevate risk. Promoting physical activity, therefore, represents a complementary approach in broader suicide prevention efforts [2].

Furthermore, demographic nuances are crucial; a systematic review exploring gender differences in both risk and protective factors for suicide attempts among adolescents reveals that while some factors are universal, others are gender-specific. These differences significantly influence how prevention strategies should be tailored for adolescent boys and girls, emphasizing the need for nuanced and effective interventions [8].

Recent epidemiological studies illuminate concerning trends in suicide attempts. From 2018 to 2022, trends in suicide attempts and emergency department visits for intentional self-harm among US adults have provided recent insights into mental health burdens. These studies reveal unsettling patterns, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting shifts in mental health needs and underscoring urgent requirements for public health interventions focused on prevention [7].

Specifically addressing the pandemic's impact, research investigates its influence on suicide attempts among children and adolescents, indicating a significant, albeit varied, increase in attempts within this vulnerable population during that period. This highlights the critical need for focused mental health support and resources for young people during crises [10].

In response to these identified risks and trends, various intervention strategies are being rigorously evaluated. Psychological interventions, for instance, demonstrate significant effectiveness. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of psychological interventions for preventing suicide attempts suggests that specific therapies, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), can significantly reduce the risk of repeat suicide attempts. This underscores the importance of evidence-based psychological treatments in post-attempt care [4].

Moreover, the evolving landscape of mental healthcare includes digital solutions. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating digital mental health interventions for individuals with a history of suicide attempts indicates that technology-based tools can be a promising adjunct to traditional care, potentially increasing accessibility and engagement in treatment. This highlights the growing role of digital platforms in supporting suicide prevention efforts by reaching broader populations [9].

Collectively, this body of research provides a robust foundation for understanding, predicting, and intervening in suicide attempts, advocating for integrated and responsive approaches.

Description

Understanding the multifaceted nature of suicide attempts requires a comprehensive overview of contributing factors, vulnerable populations, and effective interventions. A systematic review and meta-analysis shed light on crucial risk factors for suicide attempts among individuals with severe mental illness, identifying a history of previous attempts, co-occurring substance use disorders, and higher symptom severity as key predictors. This understanding is paramount for developing targeted prevention strategies [1]. The long-term trajectory after an initial suicide attempt is particularly concerning, as a prior attempt is a powerful predictor for future attempts and death by suicide. This necessitates sustained, intensive follow-up care for individuals to mitigate this persistent risk [5]. In the immediate aftermath of an attempt, the emergency department plays a crucial role; research highlights the incidence and risk factors for repeat attempts in this setting, emphasizing the need for immediate and thorough risk assessment to guide appropriate interventions [6].

Theoretical models offer explanatory power for these observations. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide, specifically, is strongly supported by meta-analytic findings confirming that perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness are significant predictors of suicide attempts. This theory proves invaluable in identifying individuals at heightened risk and subsequently informing clinical assessments and interventions [3]. Beyond psychological constructs, lifestyle choices also influence risk. A complex association exists between physical activity and self-harm, with increased physical activity potentially acting as a protective factor, while sedentary behaviors might elevate risk. This suggests that promoting physical activity could serve as a valuable complementary approach in suicide prevention efforts [2]. Furthermore, age and gender specificities cannot be overlooked. A systematic review on adolescents reveals important gender differences in both risk and protective factors for suicide attempts. Recognizing these nuances is critical for tailoring more effective and targeted prevention strategies for different youth populations [8].

Recent epidemiological trends highlight the dynamic nature of suicide attempt prevalence. Trends observed among US adults between 2018 and 2022, particularly around the COVID-19 pandemic, show concerning patterns in suicide attempts and emergency department visits for intentional self-harm. These insights underscore shifts in mental health burdens and the urgent need for public health interventions focused on prevention [7]. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic specifically on children and adolescents is further elucidated by research indicating a significant, though varied, increase in suicide attempts within this vulnerable group during the crisis. This data reinforces the necessity for dedicated mental health support and resources for young people during periods of profound societal stress [10].

In the realm of intervention, evidence-based psychological therapies demonstrate considerable efficacy. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of psychological interventions for suicide attempt prevention suggests that therapies like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) can significantly reduce the risk of repeat attempts. This underscores the vital role of these treatments in post-attempt care pathways [4]. Innovations in mental health service delivery also offer new avenues. Digital mental health interventions are emerging as promising adjuncts to traditional care for individuals with a history of suicide attempts. These technology-based tools can potentially increase accessibility and engagement in treatment, signifying a growing role for digital platforms in supporting suicide prevention efforts [9].

Ultimately, the collective body of research paints a clear picture: suicide attempts are influenced by a complex interplay of individual vulnerabilities, environmental stressors, and the presence or absence of protective factors. Effective prevention and intervention require a multi-pronged approach that integrates early identification of risk factors, evidence-based psychological treatments, public health initiatives, and the strategic deployment of digital health solutions. Addressing the needs of specific demographics, such as individuals with severe mental illness, adolescents, and those who have previously attempted suicide, is paramount for reducing the incidence and recurrence of these critical events.

Conclusion

Research into suicide attempts consistently identifies key risk factors and explores various prevention strategies. Studies highlight a history of previous suicide attempts, co-occurring substance use disorders, and higher symptom severity as crucial predictors, especially for individuals with severe mental illness. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide is reinforced by findings that perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness significantly predict attempts, guiding clinical assessments. Beyond individual psychological factors, broader determinants are explored. Physical activity may act as a protective factor, with sedentary behaviors increasing risk, suggesting its promotion as a complementary prevention approach. The impact of major societal events is also significant; for instance, the COVID-19 pandemic has been linked to a varied, yet notable, increase in suicide attempts among children and adolescents, alongside concerning trends in emergency department visits for self-harm among US adults. Efforts in prevention and intervention are critical. Psychological therapies like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) prove effective in reducing repeat attempts, underscoring their role in post-attempt care. The importance of immediate and thorough risk assessment in emergency settings for patients presenting after an attempt is also emphasized, given the high long-term risk of future attempts and completed suicide. Emerging digital mental health interventions show promise in supplementing traditional care, enhancing accessibility and engagement. Furthermore, understanding gender-specific risk and protective factors among adolescents is vital for developing tailored and more effective interventions. This body of research collectively stresses a multi-faceted approach to suicide prevention, integrating clinical, public health, and technological strategies.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Zaki-Metias S, Moussa M, Rashed W. "Risk factors for suicide attempts in patients with severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Asian J Psychiatry 90 (2023):103683.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Schuch F. "Association between physical activity and self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis".J Affect Disord 326 (2023):260-267.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Chu C, Buchman-Schmitt J, Schuck A. "Perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness as predictors of suicide attempts: A meta-analysis of the interpersonal theory of suicide".J Consult Clin Psychol 90 (2022):44-59.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Chan H, Chen C, Chang C. "The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Suicide Attempt Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Int J Environ Res Public Health 20 (2023):3171.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Ribeiro J, Franklin J, Fox K. "Long-term Risk of Suicide Attempts and Suicide After a First Suicide Attempt: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Am J Psychiatry 177 (2020):421-431.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

6. Dols A, Al-Marashda S, Dols R. "Incidence and risk factors for repeat suicide attempt in patients presenting to the emergency department after a suicide attempt: A systematic review and meta-analysis".J Affect Disord 349 (2024):409-417.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Zareef R, Ko J, Stone D. "Trends in Suicide Attempts and Emergency Department Visits for Intentional Self-Harm Among US Adults, 2018-2022".JAMA Psychiatry 80 (2023):1297-1300.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Wang C, Liu J, Su X. "Gender differences in risk factors and protective factors for suicide attempts among adolescents: A systematic review".J Affect Disord 318 (2022):184-194.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Koga Y, Kanie Y, Kanie A. "Digital mental health interventions for individuals with a history of suicide attempt: A systematic review and meta-analysis".J Affect Disord 341 (2023):172-181.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Ramezanpour M, Sadr-Azodi N, Hosseini ZS. "The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on suicide attempts among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis".J Affect Disord 326 (2023):251-259.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref