SLNB: Oncology’s Evolving Staging Cornerstone

Thomas Revington^*
*Correspondence: Thomas Revington, Department of Endocrine and Surgical Pathology, Rockfield University College of Medicine, Brighton Hill, Australia, Email:

Introduction

This article offers a comprehensive look at the established role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer management, discussing its expanded indications, especially for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while also addressing ongoing debates regarding its utility in specific low-risk settings. It emphasizes the importance of accurate nodal staging for treatment planning[1].

This review critically examines the current guidelines and practices for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma. It highlights recent updates in patient selection criteria, the prognostic value of SLN status, and the implications for adjuvant therapy decisions, particularly in light of new systemic treatments for high-risk melanoma. The authors discuss the balance between minimizing morbidity and optimizing oncologic outcomes[2].

This article reviews the expanding role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in various gynecological malignancies, including cervical, endometrial, and vulvar cancers. It synthesizes current evidence on mapping techniques, detection rates, and the impact on patient outcomes, advocating for its use as a standard of care in selected cases to reduce treatment-related morbidity while maintaining oncologic efficacy[3].

This systematic review and meta-analysis consolidates evidence on the accuracy and utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. It confirms the procedure's high diagnostic value for detecting occult metastases, supporting its adoption as an alternative to elective neck dissection in select patients to de-escalate treatment-related morbidity without compromising oncologic safety[4].

This article explores the latest advancements in imaging modalities used for sentinel lymph node detection across various cancers. It details the emergence of novel tracers, hybrid imaging technologies like SPECT/CT and PET/CT, and fluorescence imaging, discussing how these innovations improve detection rates, precision, and intraoperative guidance, ultimately enhancing surgical outcomes and reducing unnecessary interventions[5].

This paper addresses the complexities in the pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes, highlighting the importance of standardized protocols for sectioning, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. It discusses the challenges of detecting micrometastases and isolated tumor cells, and how evolving technologies are shaping future diagnostic approaches to improve sensitivity and specificity in nodal staging[6].

This review focuses on how sentinel lymph node biopsy, particularly after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, facilitates the de-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients. It outlines the criteria for avoiding complete axillary lymph node dissection, thereby reducing lymphedema and other morbidities, and emphasizes the shifting paradigm towards individualized, less invasive management strategies based on robust nodal assessment[7].

This article explores the evolving application of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thyroid cancer, a field where its utility is still under active investigation. It discusses the potential benefits for personalized nodal staging, especially in patients with clinically negative necks, aiming to identify microscopic metastases that might influence treatment intensity and surveillance strategies, potentially minimizing the extent of central compartment lymph node dissection[8].

This paper emphasizes the critical importance of robust training and quality assurance programs for sentinel lymph node biopsy, particularly given its widespread adoption and impact on patient outcomes. It advocates for a multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, pathologists, and nuclear medicine physicians, outlining benchmarks and accreditation processes necessary to maintain high standards of detection and false-negative rates, thereby ensuring optimal patient care[9].

This article looks ahead at the future of sentinel lymph node biopsy, proposing shifts beyond conventional applications. It discusses emerging areas such as the potential for non-invasive molecular staging, advanced intraoperative assessment techniques, and its integration into personalized medicine frameworks, aiming to further refine patient selection, minimize surgical invasiveness, and enhance prognostic accuracy in oncology[10].

Description

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) has firmly established itself as a cornerstone in modern oncology, providing critical insights for accurate nodal staging and guiding treatment strategies across a spectrum of cancers. In breast cancer management, SLNB offers a comprehensive perspective on its integral role, with indications expanding even to patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ongoing discussions also address its utility in specific low-risk settings, underscoring the consistent emphasis on precise nodal staging for effective treatment planning [1]. Parallel to this, the current guidelines and practices for SLNB in melanoma are undergoing critical examination. Recent updates have refined patient selection criteria, clarified the prognostic significance of Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) status, and informed decisions regarding adjuvant therapies, particularly with the advent of novel systemic treatments for high-risk melanoma. The overarching aim remains to meticulously balance the minimization of patient morbidity with the optimization of oncologic outcomes [2].

Beyond breast cancer and melanoma, SLNB's role is continually expanding into other significant areas, demonstrating its versatility and impact. In various gynecological malignancies, including cervical, endometrial, and vulvar cancers, SLNB is increasingly recognized. Current evidence rigorously synthesizes information on mapping techniques, detection rates, and the profound impact on patient outcomes, strongly advocating for its adoption as a standard of care in selected cases. This shift aims to substantially reduce treatment-related morbidity while rigorously maintaining oncologic efficacy [3]. Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis have consolidated compelling evidence on the accuracy and utility of SLNB in clinically node-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. The procedure has been confirmed to possess high diagnostic value for detecting occult metastases, thereby supporting its widespread adoption as a safe and effective alternative to elective neck dissection in carefully chosen patients. This crucial development allows for the de-escalation of treatment-related morbidity without compromising the critical aspects of oncologic safety [4].

A key advantage of SLNB lies in its ability to facilitate treatment de-escalation and enable more personalized staging approaches. For breast cancer patients, particularly after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, SLNB plays a pivotal role in safely reducing the extent of axillary surgery. It clearly outlines the criteria for avoiding complete axillary lymph node dissection, a practice that significantly reduces morbidities such as lymphedema. This underscores a vital paradigm shift towards individualized, less invasive management strategies, all based on a robust and precise nodal assessment [7]. In the realm of thyroid cancer, the application of SLNB is an evolving field, currently under active investigation. Researchers are exploring its potential benefits for personalized nodal staging, especially for patients with clinically negative necks. The goal is to identify microscopic metastases that could critically influence treatment intensity and surveillance strategies, potentially leading to a minimized extent of central compartment lymph node dissection [8].

The ongoing evolution of sentinel lymph node biopsy is heavily influenced by rapid advancements in technology and refined pathological understanding. Latest advancements in imaging modalities used for sentinel lymph node detection span across a wide array of cancers. This includes the advent of novel tracers, sophisticated hybrid imaging technologies such as SPECT/CT and PET/CT, and cutting-edge fluorescence imaging. These innovations are instrumental in improving detection rates, enhancing precision, and providing invaluable intraoperative guidance, which collectively leads to superior surgical outcomes and a reduction in unnecessary interventions [5]. Concurrently, the pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes is a complex process. It demands strict adherence to standardized protocols for sectioning, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. The challenges associated with detecting elusive micrometastases and isolated tumor cells are significant, yet evolving technologies are continually shaping future diagnostic approaches to substantially improve sensitivity and specificity in nodal staging, ensuring more accurate patient prognosis and management [6].

To maintain the efficacy and safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy, robust training and quality assurance programs are critically important, especially given its widespread adoption and profound impact on patient outcomes. This necessitates a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach that brings together surgeons, pathologists, and nuclear medicine physicians. Establishing clear benchmarks and comprehensive accreditation processes is essential to consistently uphold high standards for detection rates and to effectively minimize false-negative rates, thereby ensuring the delivery of optimal patient care [9]. Looking beyond conventional applications, the future perspectives for SLNB envision transformative shifts. Emerging areas include the exciting potential for non-invasive molecular staging, further advanced intraoperative assessment techniques, and its seamless integration into personalized medicine frameworks. These anticipated developments aim to continually refine patient selection, significantly minimize surgical invasiveness, and ultimately enhance prognostic accuracy within oncology, promising a more precise and patient-centric approach to cancer treatment [10].

Conclusion

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) has become a cornerstone in oncology, revolutionizing nodal staging and treatment for various cancers. It's widely applied in breast cancer, including for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in melanoma, where updated guidelines refine patient selection and adjuvant therapy decisions. Its utility also spans gynecological malignancies like cervical, endometrial, and vulvar cancers, reducing morbidity while maintaining oncologic efficacy. For oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, SLNB proves highly accurate in detecting occult metastases, offering a safer alternative to neck dissection. The procedure facilitates de-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer, minimizing complications like lymphedema, and shows promise for personalized staging in thyroid cancer by identifying microscopic metastases. Advances in imaging, such as hybrid technologies and fluorescence imaging, enhance detection precision and intraoperative guidance. Pathological evaluation remains complex, requiring standardized protocols to detect micrometastases, with technology improving sensitivity. Ensuring quality through multidisciplinary training and accreditation is vital for optimal patient care. Future perspectives for SLNB include non-invasive molecular staging and integration into personalized medicine, aiming to further refine patient selection, minimize invasiveness, and improve prognostic accuracy.

Acknowledgement

None

Conflict of Interest

None

References

Elisabeth S, Maria M, Lars H. "Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Current Indications and Controversies".Cancers (Basel) 13 (2021):3778.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Haralambos G, Christos M, George K. "Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: A Critical Review of Evolving Guidelines and Current Practices".Cancers (Basel) 14 (2022):2776.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Valentina G, Cinzia C, Ottavia D. "Sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynecological cancers: a review of current evidence and future perspectives".Int J Gynecol Cancer 33 (2023):2-10.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Marije V, Robert PT, Ron S. "Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Clinically N0 Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Oral Oncol 109 (2020):104803.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Juhun K, Jong HL, Young SP. "Advances in Imaging Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Oncology".J Nucl Med 65 (2024):11-19.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Massimo M, Lucia M, Monica M. "Pathological Examination of Sentinel Lymph Nodes: Current Challenges and Future Directions".Front Oncol 11 (2021):704101.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Hatem S, Diana C, Chirag S. "De-escalation of Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer: The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy".Semin Radiat Oncol 32 (2022):153-162.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Young ML, Seung HL, Jae HS. "The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thyroid Cancer: An Evolving Landscape".J Clin Med 12 (2023):1406.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Michael SS, Kathryn JVZ, Armando EG. "Ensuring Quality in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Training and Accreditation".Ann Surg Oncol 27 (2020):2673-2680.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

Jasper EV, Charlotte dB, Dick vD. "Future Perspectives on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Beyond the Traditional Paradigm".Eur J Surg Oncol 50 (2024):107386.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref