GET THE APP

Quality of Life and Sexual Function after Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Longitudinal Study
Archives of Surgical Oncology

Archives of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 2471-2671

Open Access

Perspective - (2025) Volume 11, Issue 1

Quality of Life and Sexual Function after Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Longitudinal Study

Taniga Nishee*
*Correspondence: Taniga Nishee, Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan, Email:
Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan

Received: 28-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. aso-25-165912; Editor assigned: 30-Jan-2025, Pre QC No. P-165912; Reviewed: 13-Feb-2025, QC No. Q-165912; Revised: 20-Feb-2025, Manuscript No. R-165912; Published: 27-Feb-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2471-2671.2025.11.152
Citation: Nishee, Taniga. “Quality of Life and Sexual Function after Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Longitudinal Study.” Arch Surg Oncol 11 (2025): 152.
Copyright: © 2025 Nishee T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed in men worldwide. With advancements in early detection and treatment, the survival rate for prostate cancer has improved significantly. However, the long-term outcomes of prostate cancer treatment often involve significant changes in quality of life, particularly regarding sexual function. The impact of treatment for prostate cancer, such as surgery, radiation therapy, or androgen deprivation therapy, on sexual function and overall quality of life is a critical consideration for patients and healthcare providers alike. This article examines the long-term effects of prostate cancer treatments on quality of life and sexual function, drawing from a longitudinal study that explores how these factors evolve over time following treatment [1].

Description

Quality of life is a multi-dimensional concept that encompasses various aspects of an individual's well-being, including physical, emotional, and social factors. In the context of prostate cancer, quality of life is heavily influenced by both the disease and its treatment. Prostate cancer treatments, while essential for controlling the disease, often result in side effects that can diminish a patientâ??s quality of life. Sexual dysfunction is one of the most common and distressing side effects of prostate cancer treatment. The prostate gland plays a crucial role in sexual function, particularly in the ability to achieve and maintain an erection [2]. As a result, treatments that affect the prostate, such as prostatectomy (surgical removal of the prostate) or radiation therapy, can lead to varying degrees of erectile dysfunction. Furthermore, androgen deprivation therapy, which lowers testosterone levels, can have profound effects on sexual desire and function, as well as other aspects of physical health [3].

In the aftermath of treatment, many prostate cancer patients experience a decline in sexual function. Erectile dysfunction is one of the most prevalent sexual problems following prostate cancer treatment. Studies have shown that as many as 50 to 80 percent of men who undergo prostatectomy or radiation therapy experience some degree of erectile dysfunction, with the severity of the dysfunction varying depending on the type of treatment and individual factors. Androgen deprivation therapy, often used for advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, can also cause a reduction in libido and erectile function due to the lowering of testosterone levels. This decline in sexual function can lead to emotional distress, relationship difficulties, and a decrease in overall satisfaction with life. The long-term effects of these changes can have a lasting impact on the well-being of prostate cancer survivors, affecting their mental health and social interactions [4].

A longitudinal study that tracks the quality of life and sexual function of prostate cancer patients over an extended period offers valuable insights into how these aspects evolve after treatment. Such studies typically assess various domains of quality of life, including physical health, emotional well-being, social functioning, and sexual health, over the course of several months or years. By tracking these factors over time, researchers can identify patterns in the recovery or worsening of symptoms, determine the duration of treatment-related side effects, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving sexual function and overall well-being. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the long-term impact of prostate cancer treatment on patients' lives [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the impact of prostate cancer treatment on sexual function and overall quality of life is a critical consideration for both patients and healthcare providers. While many patients experience some degree of sexual dysfunction following treatment, the long-term effects on quality of life can be managed with appropriate interventions and support. Longitudinal studies offer valuable insights into the recovery process and highlight the importance of a comprehensive approach to patient care that addresses both the physical and emotional challenges of prostate cancer. As treatment options continue to evolve, it is crucial to prioritize strategies that improve not only survival but also the long-term well-being of prostate cancer survivors. Personalized care, psychological support, and effective management of sexual dysfunction can help improve the quality of life for prostate cancer patients, ensuring that they are able to live well after treatment.

Acknowledgment

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Fizazi, Karim, NamPhuong Tran, Luis Fein and Nobuaki Matsubara, et al. "Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): Final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial." Lancet Oncol 20 (2019): 686-700.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

  1. James, Nicholas D., Johann S. de Bono, Melissa R. Spears and Noel W. Clarke, et al. "Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy." N Engl J Med 377 (2017): 338-351.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

  1. Chi, Kim N., Neeraj Agarwal, Anders Bjartell and Byung Ha Chung, et al. "Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer." N Engl J Med 381 (2019): 13-24.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

  1. Chi, Kim N., Simon Chowdhury, Anders Bjartell and Byung Ha Chung, et al. "Apalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: Final survival analysis of the randomized, double-blind, phase III TITAN study." J Clin Oncol 39 (2021): 2294-2303.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

  1. Sweeney, Christopher J., Andrew J. Martin, Martin R. Stockler and Stephen Begbie, et al. "Testosterone suppression plus enzalutamide versus testosterone suppression plus standard antiandrogen therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ENZAMET): An international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial." Lancet Oncol 24 (2023): 323-334.

Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward