Short Communication - (2025) Volume 10, Issue 2
Received: 03-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. jmhmp-25-168569;
Editor assigned: 05-Mar-2025, Pre QC No. P-168569;
Reviewed: 17-Mar-2025, QC No. Q-168569;
Revised: 24-Mar-2025, Manuscript No. R-168569;
Published:
31-Mar-2025
, DOI: 10.37421/2684-494X.2025.10.277
Citation: Fontaine, Dawson. “Molecular Dissection of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Apoptosis Pathways in Lung Cancer Biopsies.” J Mol Hist Med Phys 10 (2025): 277.
Copyright: © 2025 Fontaine D. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The intrinsic apoptosis pathway is triggered by intracellular stress signals such as DNA damage, oxidative stress, or oncogene activation. These stimuli converge on the mitochondria, where a delicate balance between pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 protein family determines cell fate. In healthy cells, anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL maintain mitochondrial integrity. However, upon activation of pro-apoptotic proteins like Bax, Bak, or BH3-only proteins (e.g., Bid, Bim, Puma), mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) occurs, resulting in the release of cytochrome c and subsequent formation of the apoptosome. This multiprotein complex activates caspase-9, which in turn triggers the effector caspases (e.g., caspase-3 and -7) responsible for the execution of cell death. In lung cancer tissues, overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins and downregulation or mutation of pro-apoptotic mediators is frequently observed. For instance, Bcl-2 is often overexpressed in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), while Bim or Bax may be suppressed in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), contributing to apoptosis resistance and poor treatment response. The extrinsic apoptosis pathway is initiated through the activation of death receptors on the cell surface, such as Fas (CD95), TNF receptor and TRAIL receptors (DR4 and DR5). Ligand binding induces receptor trimerization and recruitment of the adaptor protein FADD (Fas-associated death domain), which in turn recruits and activates caspase-8 at the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC). Activated caspase-8 either directly activates effector caspases or cleaves Bid into truncated Bid (tBid), which then engages the intrinsic pathway by triggering mitochondrial membrane permeabilization. In lung cancer, mutations or downregulation of death receptors, decoy receptors, or alterations in DISC components impair this pathway. Moreover, inhibitors such as c-FLIP, which blocks caspase-8 activation, are frequently upregulated in lung tumors and contribute to extrinsic pathway inhibition [3].
Molecular profiling of lung cancer biopsies has revealed substantial heterogeneity in the expression and regulation of apoptosis-related genes. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization studies have demonstrated that the levels and localization of key proteins like Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-3 and survivin can vary significantly within tumor regions and between histological subtypes. Molecular analyses such as RT-qPCR, Western blotting and next-generation sequencing of biopsy specimens have further elucidated the presence of mutations or alternative splicing events in apoptosis-regulating genes. For example, splice variants of Bcl-x, notably the anti-apoptotic Bcl-xL and the pro-apoptotic Bcl-xS, exhibit distinct expression patterns in lung cancer and influence tumor behavior and drug sensitivity. Similarly, polymorphisms in death receptor genes or promoter methylation may modulate their expression and impact therapeutic outcomes. The interaction between the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways is also critical in lung cancer pathophysiology. Crosstalk between these pathways amplifies the apoptotic signal and disruption of this coordination contributes to apoptosis resistance. The cleavage of Bid by caspase-8 is a well-documented link, but recent studies also highlight the role of mitochondrial-derived Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in modulating death receptor signaling and the involvement of transcription factors such as p53 and NF-κB in regulating both pathways. In lung cancer biopsies, p53 mutations are common, particularly in smoking-related NSCLC and often correlate with defective apoptosis due to impaired transcriptional activation of pro-apoptotic genes like Bax, Noxa, or Puma [4].
From a therapeutic perspective, understanding the molecular mechanisms governing apoptosis in lung cancer is pivotal. Many chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy modalities act, at least in part, by inducing apoptosis. However, resistance frequently emerges due to molecular alterations in the apoptosis machinery. Targeted therapies aimed at restoring apoptosis have shown promise in preclinical models and clinical trials. BH3 mimetics such as venetoclax, which antagonize Bcl-2, have demonstrated efficacy in hematologic malignancies and are under evaluation in lung cancer. Similarly, agents that activate TRAIL receptors or sensitize tumors to death receptor-mediated apoptosis are being explored. Combinatorial approaches that simultaneously target multiple nodes in the apoptotic network such as combining death receptor agonists with mitochondrial pathway sensitizers may overcome resistance mechanisms and enhance therapeutic efficacy. Biomarker development based on apoptosis pathway profiling is an emerging frontier in personalized medicine for lung cancer. Expression patterns of Bcl-2 family proteins, caspases and death receptors can potentially predict treatment response and guide therapeutic selection. Additionally, dynamic assessment of apoptosis-related markers before and after therapy could serve as indicators of drug efficacy or early relapse. Liquid biopsy techniques, including the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), exosomes and apoptotic bodies, offer non-invasive means to monitor apoptosis dynamics and tumor evolution in real time [5].
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at