GET THE APP

Cytogenetic Effects in Patients after Computed Tomography Examination
..

Molecular and Genetic Medicine

ISSN: 1747-0862

Open Access

Perspective - (2022) Volume 16, Issue 10

Cytogenetic Effects in Patients after Computed Tomography Examination

Waylen Gael*
*Correspondence: Waylen Gael, Department of Science, University of California, Los Angeles, USA, Email:
Department of Science, University of California, Los Angeles, USA

Received: 01-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. jmgm-22-81851; Editor assigned: 03-Oct-2022, Pre QC No. P-81851; Reviewed: 15-Oct-2022, QC No. Q-81851; Revised: 20-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. R-81851; Published: 28-Oct-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/1747-0862.2022.16.578
Citation: Gael, Waylen. “Cytogenetic Effects in Patients after Computed Tomography Examination.” J Mol Genet Med 16 (2022): 578.
Copyright: © 2022 Gael W. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans expose millions of people worldwide to low doses of ionizing radiation. Contradictory data on the potential cancer risk from CT scans call for additional research because of this. The current study's objective was to estimate genome damage after CT scans in 42 non-cancer patients and compare the estimates to those of 22 control subjects. When compared to the controls, irradiated patients had significantly more chromosome breaks and dicentric ring chromosomes. The distribution of dicentrics among the cells was non-Poisson, indicating partial-body radiation exposure and non-uniformity. The Poisson distribution, which is typical for uniform whole-body exposures, was followed by a small number of patients. A level of dicentrics that was comparable to that of the control subjects was seen in some patients. Individual variations in frequency and dicentric distribution suggested intricate mechanisms of chromosome aberration induction and elimination that may be related to individual radio sensitivity, as well as previous diagnostic methods that utilized ionizing radiation or the redistribution of small fractions of irradiated lymphocytes within the circulatory pull. In conclusion, CT scans may harm the genome and possibly raise the risk of cancer. It is suggested that these patients should have a specific follow-up, especially if they have had multiple CT scans.

Description

Between 2015 and 2018, there was a 41% increase in the number of CT scans performed on patients in Europe. Patients received doses ranging from 0.6 msv to 31 msv from various CT examination types, which corresponded to a background radiation dose lasting anywhere from two months to ten years, depending on the region. Concerns about the increased risk of cancer posed by diagnostic radiation are also growing as the use of CT scans continues to rise worldwide. Due to the increased lifetime radiation risk compared to that of adults, the risk of oncopathology in children following CT scans is the primary focus of research. In addition, a higher risk of developing non- Hodgkin's lymphoma was observed in patients under 45 years old. The confounding effect of the healthcare utilization rate can largely account for the high incidence of thyroid cancer in adults exposed to ionizing radiation during CT scanning. As a result, adult cancer risk assessments produce contradictory outcomes. However, given that millions of people are exposed to medical diagnostic radiation and the Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR) model asserts that there is no safe level of ionizing radiation exposure, it is necessary to keep in mind that even the tiniest amount of exposure poses a risk of cancer. As a result, more research is needed into the effects of CT on humans [1].

Various types of DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation alter genetic information, such as chromosome aberrations. One of the most widely used biomarkers of DNA damage in humans for examining the genotoxic effects of environmental, lifestyle and occupational factors is the analysis of unstable chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Human lymphocytes unstable chromosome aberrations, specifically dicentric and ring chromosomes have been utilized as a biological dose estimation tool and biological radiation exposure indicator for several decades. Carcinogenic effects on health can be predicted by other types of chromosome aberrations. The hypothesis that chromosome aberration is a predictor of cancer is supported by the statistical association between the risk of developing cancer and the frequency of chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes found in various groups of people. These facts suggest that people who have been exposed to medical ionizing radiation might benefit from including chromosome aberrations as biomarkers of genotoxic effects. Therefore, the evaluation of unstable chromosome aberrations in patients peripheral blood lymphocytes following a CT examination was the focus of this investigation [2].

Exposure to low dose medical irradiation resulted in DNA damage, as evidenced by the presence of chromosome breaks and radiation-induced chromosome types (such as rings and dicentrics) in exposed patients as opposed to controls. Exposed patients had a significantly higher estimated frequency of dicentrics and rings than the control group. Individual varieties in the recurrence of dicentric and ring chromosomes, as well as conveyances of dicentrics in addition to rings among cells were recognized: After being irradiated, some patients showed an increase in the number of dicentrics and rings, while others showed the same amount of damage; According to studies conducted in a number of nations, repeated examinations are also frequently carried out in practice. As a result, repeated CT examination results in an increase in the cumulative effective dose of at least 100 msv, an increase in the number of chromosome aberrations and a redistribution of lymphocytes that have been irradiated among cells that have already been irradiated. Changing the patterns of dicentric distribution among cells can result from simultaneous processes involving the induction of new aberrations, the elimination of previous aberrations and the delay of the mitotic cell cycle. It is common knowledge that dicentrics are gradually eliminated from turnover due to their inability to undergo multiple cell divisions, despite the fact that the type of radiation that induced them is mitotically unstable [3].

An elevated level of the g-H2AX was found in the study of the genotoxic effects of ionizing radiation exposure during CT scans. This suggests that the CT examination dose was sufficient to induce DNA double-strand breaks in cells that were proportional to the radiation dose. After CT scanning, only a few cases of cytogenetic effects have been reported. Disease and non-malignant growth patients were cytogenetically explored after single or rehashed CT filters, when CT assessment. It was discovered that the frequency of dicentric and ring chromosomes varied. In addition, irradiation resulted in an increase in the number of dicentrics in some patients, whereas a CT scan revealed lower levels of damage in others. The elimination of chromosome aberrations that may be linked to individual sensitivity, diseases, previous irradiation, or treatment and the conclusion of individual and complex mechanisms of induction should be made possible by these findings. This study demonstrated statistically higher levels of chromosome type aberrations (such as dicentrics, rings and chromosome fragments) in a group of patients following CT scanning compared to the control level. These patients were not treated with chemotherapy or radiation and did not have any oncological conditions. As a result, these aberrations could not be attributed to a combination of diseases or radiotherapy and chemotherapy. As a result, this suggests that the CT examination had genotoxic effects [4,5].

Conclusion

After CT scanning, patients underwent a conventional unstable chromosome aberration analysis. In addition, a significant (p 0.0001) increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations was found when compared to levels prior to exposure. Each person only had 300 cells counted. In addition, the authors presented chromosome aberration yields that were comparable to the sum of various chromosome aberration types (such as dicentrics, chromatid break, chromosome break and so on). And didn't say how many dicentrics there were. Accordingly, there were insufficient cytogenetic indications of overexposure that were found at this gathering. The DNA damage of the patient before and after irradiation led to these findings. As a result, the genotoxic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation were demonstrated in our case–control study of CT-exposed individuals using conventional unstable chromosome analysis.

References

  1. Frija, Guy, John Damilakis, Graciano Paulo and Reinhard Loose, et al. "Cumulative effective dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: Proposal for clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe imaging survey." European Radiology 31 (2021): 5514-5523.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Brenner, David J., Carl D. Elliston, Eric J. Hall and Walter E. Berdon. "Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT." Am J Roentgenol 176 (2001): 289-296.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Deperas, Joanna, Marta Szłuińska, Marta Deperas-Kaminska and Alan Edwards, et al. "CABAS: A freely available PC program for fitting calibration curves in chromosome aberration dosimetry." Radiat Prot Dosim 124 (2007): 115-123.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Koppen, G., G. Verheyen, A. Maes and U. Van Gorp, et al. "A battery of DNA effect biomarkers to evaluate environmental exposure of Flemish adolescents." J Appl Toxicol 273 (2007): 238-246.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Brambilla, Marco, Barbara Cannillo, Andrea Alessio and Roberta Matheoud, et al. "Patients undergoing multiphase CT scans and receiving a cumulative effective dose of≥ 100 mSv in a single episode of care." Eur Radiol 31 (2021): 4452-4458.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 3919

Molecular and Genetic Medicine received 3919 citations as per Google Scholar report

Molecular and Genetic Medicine peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward