GET THE APP

E-BABE: How to address immunogenicity in the development of a rare disease biosimilar
..

Journal of Bioanalysis & Biomedicine

ISSN: 1948-593X

Open Access

E-BABE: How to address immunogenicity in the development of a rare disease biosimilar


Joint Event on 13th International Conference on Biologics and Biosimilars & Biopharma & Biotherapeutics

October 24-25, 2018 | Boston, USA

Candida Fratazzi

BBCR Consulting, Massachusetts

Keynote: J Bioanal Biomed

Abstract :

Rare diseases hugely need moderate treatment choices. Vagrant medications have been ignored by the biosimilar business for quite a while. Patientâ??s advocates that people with rare diseases have access to safe and effective biologic and biosimilar medicines. Worldwide, 350M people are estimated to suffer from a rare disease, including 25-30M US and 30M EU residents. With >60% biologics represent most of the worldwide vagrant medication advertise. A noteworthy issue with protein-based therapeutics is their immunogenicity.Forms of an immune response are the activation of B cells and T-cells, which help to activate B cells. The T-cells react in a typical response to a fake protein remedial as though it were outside since it is unique in relation to the imperfect, common protein. A T-cell reaction confound like this occasionally happens on account of the protein FVIII. Virtually all therapeutic proteins (biologics) evoke an insusceptible reaction with the resulting creation of hostile to medicate antibodies (ADA). The ADA to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that are coordinated against the antigenbinding site of the therapeutic mAb is neutralizing. This nature of the ADA reaction explains why fully human antibodies can still be exceedingly immunogenic. Biosimilars have to be tested for their immunogenicity as it is impossible to predict if they will induce an immunogenicity similar to the one manifested by the corresponding innovator biologics. Infusion-Related Reactions (IRRs) include hypersensitivity reactions and cytokine release syndromes. Hypersensitivity reactions have classically been partitioned into type I, II, III and IV reactions; type I and III reactions are those regularly observed following administration of biologics. The infusion-related reaction is defined as a disorder characterized by an adverse reaction to the infusion of pharmacological or biological substances and as a disorder characterized by nausea, headache, tachycardia, hypotension, rash and shortness of breath and caused by the release of cytokines. Infusion-related reactions are common and timely related to drug administration and have been reported as anaphylaxis, anaphylactoid reactions and cytokine release syndrome, among other terms used. Animal toxicology studies are neither predictive of severe IRRs nor of hypersensitivity in human. With respect to intravenous (IV) administration, the SC route offers more convenience to patients, flexibility in dosing and potential to lessen medicinal services costs. There is a perception that SC organization can represent a higher immunogenicity hazard than IV administration for a given protein.However, a recent comparative clinical study of sc vs iv administration of abatacept showed that the efficacy and immunogenicity are comparable between the two routes of administration.

Biography :

Candida Fratazzi is a Founder and President of BBCR consulting. Leveraging extensive experience leading early clinical development and developing regulatory strategy, BBCR consulting is a valuable asset for a company requiring advisory related to life science product development; specifically, pipeline and clinical plan assessments, clinical trials, GTM strategy, safety, or biomarker. BBCR team areas of expertise include rare diseases, immune-oncology, immunology, inflammation, risk-benefit management, regulatory compliance and FDA issues. BBCR team is a specialized in orphan, autoimmune, oncology and CNS indications for an innovator, biosimilar and repurposing products. BBCR team has contributed innovative clinical regulatory strategies and trial design for products directed to regulatory compliance across international government entities for drug, device and combination products. BBCR team leads evidence-based trial strategies, cost-effective solutions reduces risks and facilitate patient centricity, recruitment and retention she is an accomplished Senior Executive MD with more than 25 years of success spanning biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and device. She led market approval for five major products, improved endpoint achievability and designed Natural History studies and registry protocols. An industry leader, she is a sought-after speaker presenting at international industry summits. Candida attained her MD and a higher degree in Immunology and trained at The Johns Hopkins University and The Harvard University.

E-mail: cfratazzi@bbcrconsulting.com

 

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 3099

Journal of Bioanalysis & Biomedicine received 3099 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Bioanalysis & Biomedicine peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward
https://www.olimpbase.org/1937/