GET THE APP

Surgical Treatment of Robotics
..

Advances in Robotics & Automation

ISSN: 2168-9695

Open Access

Editorial - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 4

Surgical Treatment of Robotics

Yvonne Saunders*
*Correspondence: Yvonne Saunders, Department of Economics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy, Email:
Department of Economics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Received: 05-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. ara-21-47159; Editor assigned: 07-Apr-2022, Pre QC No. P-47159; Reviewed: 10-Apr-2022, QC No. Q-47159; Revised: 15-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. R-47159; Published: 20-Apr-2022 , DOI: 10.4172/2168-9695.2022.11.202
Citation: Saunders, Yvonne. “Surgical Treatment of Robotics.” Adv Robot Autom 11 (2022): 206.
Copyright: © 2022 Saunders Y. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Editorial

Robotic surgical treatments are forms of surgical strategies which can be accomplished the use of robot structures. Robotically-assisted surgical treatment became evolved to strive to conquer the constraints of pre-current minimally-invasive surgical strategies and to decorate the abilities of surgeons acting open surgical treatment.

In the case of robotically-assisted minimally-invasive surgical treatment, rather than without delay shifting the devices, the physician makes use of one in every of techniques to manage the devices. These consist of the use of a right away telemanipulator or thru pc manipulate. A telemanipulator is a far flung manipulator that permits the physician to carry out the ordinary moves related to the surgical treatment. The robot fingers perform the ones moves the use of end-effectors and manipulators to carry out the real surgical treatment. In pc-managed structures, the physician makes use of a pc to manipulate the robot fingers and its end-effectors, aleven though those structures also can nonetheless use telemanipulators for his or her input. One benefit of the use of the automatic approach is that the physician does now no longer need to be present, main to the opportunity for far flung surgical treatment [1].

The idea of the use of popular hand grips to manipulate manipulators and cameras of numerous sizes right all the way down to sub-miniature became defined with inside the Robert Heinlein story 'Waldo', which additionally referred to mind surgical treatment. The first robotic to help in surgical treatment became the Arthrobot, which became evolved and used for the primary time in Vancouver in 1985. This robotic assisted in being capable of control and role the patient's leg on voice command. The robotic became utilized in an orthopaedic surgical treatment on 12 March 1984, on the UBC Hospital in Vancouver [2]. Over 60 arthroscopic surgical strategies had been accomplished withinside the first 12 months, and a 1985 National Geographic video on commercial robots, The Robotics Revolution, featured the device. Other associated robot gadgets evolved on the identical time blanketed a surgical scrub nurse robotic, which surpassed operative devices on voice command, and a clinical laboratory robot arm [3]. A YouTube video entitled Arthrobot- the world's first surgical robotic illustrates a number of those in operation.

In 1985 a robotic, the Unimation Puma 200, became used to orient a needle for a mind biopsy whilst beneathneath CT steering at some stage in a neurological procedure. In the overdue 1980s, Imperial College in London evolved PROBOT, which became then used to carry out prostatic surgical treatment. The benefits to this robotic became its small size, accuracy and shortage of fatigue for the physician. In 1992, the ROBODOC became delivered and revolutionized orthopedic surgical treatment via way of means of being capable of help with hip alternative surgeries [4]. The latter became the primary surgical robotic that became authorised via way of means of the FDA in 2008. The ROBODOC from Integrated Surgical Systems (operating carefully with IBM) ought to mill out specific fittings with inside the femur for hip alternative. The reason of the ROBODOC became to update the preceding approach of carving out a femur for an implant, the usage of a mallet and broach/rasp.

Further improvement of robot structures became done via way of means of SRI International and Intuitive Surgical with the advent of the da Vinci Surgical System and Computer Motion with the AESOP and the ZEUS robot surgical system. AESOP became a step forward in robot surgical treatment while delivered in 1994, because it became the primary laparoscopic digital digicam holder to be authorised via way of means of the FDA. NASA first of all funded the employer that produces AESOP, Computer Motion, because of its purpose to create a robot arm that may be utilized in space; however this mission ended up turning into a digital digicam utilized in laparoscopic strategies [5]. ZEUS became delivered commercially in 1998, and became began out the concept of telerobotics or telepresence surgical treatment in which the physician is at a distance from the robotic on a console and operates at the patient.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Paul, HA, W L Bargar, B Mittlestadt, and B Musits, et al. “Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty.” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1992): 57–66. 
  2. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  3. Lanfranco, Anthony R, Andres E Castellanos, Jaydev P Desai, and William C Meyers. “Robotic surgery: a current perspective.” Annals of Surgery 239 (2004): 14–21. 
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Spinelli, Antonino, Giulia David, Stefano Gidaro, and Michele Carvello, et al. “First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback.” Colorectal Disease 20 (2018): 228–235. 
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Mirkin, Joshua N, William T Lowrance, Andrew H Feifer, and John P Mulhall, et al. “Direct-to-consumer Internet promotion of robotic prostatectomy exhibits varying quality of information.” Health Affairs 31 (2012): 760–769. 
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Basto, Marnique, Matthew R Cooperberg, and Declan G Murphy. “Proton therapy websites: information anarchy creates confusion.” BJU International 115 (2015): 183–185. 
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1127

Advances in Robotics & Automation received 1127 citations as per Google Scholar report

Advances in Robotics & Automation peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward