Brief Report - (2025) Volume 11, Issue 6
Received: 01-Dec-2025, Manuscript No. abp-25-178160;
Editor assigned: 03-Dec-2025, Pre QC No. P-178160;
Reviewed: 17-Dec-2025, QC No. Q-178160;
Revised: 22-Dec-2025, Manuscript No. R-178160;
Published:
29-Dec-2025
, DOI: 10.37421/2472-0496.2025.11.352
Citation: Alvarez, Sofia. ”Social Anxiety: Onset, Impact, and Treatment.” Abnorm Behav Psychol 11 (2025):352.
Copyright: © 2025 Alvarez S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy both prove effective for social anxiety disorder. However, a network meta-analysis suggests CBT may have a slight advantage in long-term benefits and reducing relapse rates. It's clear that individualizing treatment plans, considering patient preferences and symptom severity, is key, with specific SSRIs often being a first-line pharmacological approach [1].
Understanding the neural underpinnings of social anxiety disorder is critical. Functional neuroimaging studies indicate that individuals with this disorder frequently show altered activity in brain regions vital for fear processing, emotion regulation, and social cognition, including areas like the amygdala, prefrontal cortex, and insula. These findings offer insight into the biological mechanisms driving the condition [2].
Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy (ICBT) stands out as an efficacious and accessible treatment option, demonstrating comparability to face-to-face CBT for social anxiety disorder. This approach holds significant potential to broaden treatment access, especially for those who face barriers to traditional therapy, and importantly, it maintains sustained effects post-treatment [3].
The global prevalence and significant burden of social anxiety disorder are often underestimated. This condition affects a substantial portion of the population and frequently goes undiagnosed or untreated, leading to considerable impairment in daily functioning and overall quality of life. This highlights a pressing unmet need for effective interventions [4].
Comorbidity between social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder is common and profoundly impacts clinical outcomes. People often experience both conditions simultaneously, meaning effective treatment approaches must address both disorders. The presence of one condition can exacerbate the other, making comprehensive care essential for better patient outcomes [5].
A thorough evaluation of various pharmacological treatments for social anxiety disorder confirms the efficacy of several medication classes. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are particularly effective in reducing symptoms, underscoring the importance of selecting medication based on individual patient characteristics and tolerability [6].
The developmental course and critical risk factors for social anxiety disorder in childhood and adolescence reveal early onset is typical. Specific temperamental traits, certain parenting styles, and adverse peer experiences can substantially contribute to its development. Early identification and intervention are therefore crucial to lessen its long-term impact [7].
Optimizing treatment requires a clear understanding of the mechanisms of change in exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder. Key factors identified as pivotal to successful outcomes include a reduction in avoidance behaviors, habituation to feared situations, and effective cognitive restructuring. In essence, exposure therapy helps individuals gradually confront and relearn safety in contexts they previously feared [8].
Emotion regulation difficulties are a core, pervasive feature of social anxiety disorder. Individuals with social anxiety consistently struggle with regulating their emotions, frequently employing maladaptive strategies such as suppression or rumination. Addressing these emotion regulation difficulties through targeted interventions offers a promising avenue for improving treatment outcomes [9].
Social anxiety disorder has a profound impact on peer relationships, particularly during adolescence, often resulting in social isolation and diminished social functioning. Adolescents grappling with social anxiety frequently encounter greater challenges in forming and maintaining friendships, which can, in turn, intensify their symptoms and negatively affect overall developmental trajectories [10].
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) presents a significant global health burden, often going undiagnosed and untreated, which leads to substantial impairment in daily functioning and quality of life [4]. This widespread condition affects a large portion of the population, underscoring a pressing, unmet need for effective treatment strategies. The disorderâ??s impact is profound, particularly during critical developmental periods like adolescence, where it can severely disrupt peer relationships, fostering isolation and reduced social functioning. Adolescents experiencing SAD often face increased difficulties in forming and maintaining friendships, which can, in turn, exacerbate symptoms and negatively influence developmental outcomes [10]. Furthermore, SAD frequently has an early onset in childhood and adolescence, influenced by specific temperamental traits, parenting styles, and challenging peer experiences [7]. Recognizing these developmental risk factors and intervening early is crucial to mitigating the long-term effects of the disorder [7].
When considering treatment options for social anxiety disorder, both cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy have demonstrated efficacy. A network meta-analysis highlights CBTâ??s potential for slightly superior long-term benefits and reduced relapse rates compared to pharmacotherapy [1]. However, the approach should always be individualized, taking into account patient preferences and symptom severity. Notably, specific Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are frequently utilized as a first-line pharmacological treatment [1]. Expanding access to therapy is also a major concern, and Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) has emerged as an efficacious and accessible alternative, comparable to face-to-face CBT. ICBT holds significant promise for individuals encountering barriers to traditional therapy, importantly maintaining its therapeutic effects post-treatment [3]. Furthermore, a systematic review of pharmacological treatments confirms that several medication classes, especially SSRIs, are effective in alleviating social anxiety symptoms, emphasizing the importance of selecting drugs based on individual patient characteristics and tolerability [6].
Delving deeper into the nature of social anxiety disorder reveals critical insights into its underlying mechanisms and associated challenges. Functional neuroimaging studies indicate that individuals with social anxiety often exhibit altered activity in key brain regions involved in fear processing, emotion regulation, and social cognition, such as the amygdala, prefrontal cortex, and insula [2]. These findings provide a clearer understanding of the biological underpinnings driving the disorder. A core feature consistently observed in social anxiety disorder is difficulty with emotion regulation [9]. Individuals frequently employ maladaptive strategies like suppression or rumination to manage their feelings, which can worsen symptoms. Addressing these emotion regulation difficulties through targeted interventions offers a promising avenue for improving treatment outcomes [9].
The presence of comorbidity significantly complicates the clinical picture of social anxiety disorder. There is a widespread comorbidity between SAD and major depressive disorder, which markedly impacts clinical outcomes [5]. It is crucial for treatment plans to address both conditions simultaneously, as one can exacerbate the other, requiring comprehensive approaches for optimal patient benefit [5]. Understanding the mechanisms of change within specific therapies is also vital for treatment optimization. For exposure therapy, a cornerstone of CBT for SAD, successful outcomes are linked to factors such as reduced avoidance, habituation to feared social situations, and cognitive restructuring [8]. Essentially, exposure helps individuals gradually confront and relearn safety in contexts they previously feared, facilitating a fundamental shift in their responses [8].
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a prevalent and burdensome condition globally, often left untreated and significantly impairing daily life, particularly impacting adolescent peer relationships and developmental trajectories. Its early onset in childhood and adolescence is influenced by factors like temperament, parenting, and peer interactions, emphasizing the need for early identification and intervention. Effective treatments for SAD include cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy, with CBT demonstrating a slight edge in long-term benefits and relapse reduction. Individualized treatment, considering patient preferences and symptom severity, is critical, with SSRIs often serving as a first-line pharmacological approach. Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) expands treatment access, showing efficacy comparable to traditional CBT. Neuroimaging studies reveal altered brain activity in fear processing and emotion regulation regions among individuals with SAD, providing insight into its biological mechanisms. A core difficulty for those with social anxiety is emotion regulation, often involving maladaptive strategies; addressing these difficulties can enhance treatment outcomes. The widespread comorbidity between SAD and major depressive disorder means integrated treatment strategies are necessary to address both conditions for improved patient outcomes. Exposure therapy, a key component of CBT, works by reducing avoidance, promoting habituation, and facilitating cognitive restructuring, helping individuals relearn safety in social contexts.
None
None
1. Falk L, Christian S, Thilo H. "Comparing CBT and Pharmacotherapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials".JAMA Psychiatry 79 (2022):969-979.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
2. Ruth AL, Paul F, Naotsugu T. "Neural mechanisms of social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies".Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 5 (2020):4-15.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
3. Kevin F, Deborah Z, Winfried R. "Efficacy of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Clin Psychol Rev 87 (2021):102022.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
4. Canan A, Wouter dV, Agnes APvE. "Prevalence, burden, and unmet need for social anxiety disorder: A systematic review".J Affect Disord 268 (2020):262-273.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
5. Ville K, Jari L, Eero K. "Comorbidity of social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis".J Affect Disord 282 (2021):669-680.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
6. Christian S, Leo PH, Falk L. "Pharmacotherapy for social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis".J Anxiety Disord 80 (2021):102390.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
7. Naomi V, Maarten T, Robert V. "Social anxiety disorder in childhood and adolescence: Developmental course and risk factors".Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 24 (2021):747-761.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
8. Emmelie O, Stina H, Elin S. "Identifying mechanisms of change in exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: A systematic review".Behav Ther 53 (2022):312-329.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
9. Erin SW, Laura JO, Philippe RG. "Emotion regulation difficulties in social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis".Clin Psychol Rev 83 (2021):101948.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref
10. Andrea LJ, Carolina V, Juan MV. "Social anxiety disorder and peer relationships in adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed) 15 (2022):226-239.
Abnormal and Behavioural Psychology received 361 citations as per Google Scholar report