Robot Fish Caudal Propulsive Mechanisms: A Mini-Review

Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics

ISSN: 2168-9679

Open Access

Mini Review - (2022) Volume 11, Issue 7

Robot Fish Caudal Propulsive Mechanisms: A Mini-Review

Changu Wangy*
*Correspondence: Changu Wangy, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, P.R. China, Email:
Department of Engineering Mechanics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, P.R. China

Received: 04-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. JACM-22-75066; Editor assigned: 06-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. P-75066; Reviewed: 20-Jul-2022, QC No. Q-75066; Revised: 22-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. R-75066; Published: 24-Jul-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/ 2168-9679.2022.11.483
Citation: Wangy, Changu. “Robot Fish Caudal Propulsive Mechanisms: A Mini-Review.” J Appl Computat Math 11 (2022): 483.
Copyright: © 2022 Wangy C. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Scientists have fostered various fake fish to impersonate the abilities to swim of natural species and comprehend their biomechanical underwater abilities. The inspiration emerges from the interest to acquire further appreciation of the effective idea of organic motion, which is the consequence of millions of long stretches of development and transformation. Blade based natural species created remarkable abilities to swim and prominent execution in profoundly unique and complex underwater conditions. Accordingly, in light of examination by established researchers, this little survey focuses on talking about the mechanical gadgets created to execute the caudal propulsive portions of automated fish. Caudal components are of impressive interest since they might be intended to control inertial and gravitational powers, as well as applying extraordinary unique reach in automated fish. This original copy gives a compact survey zeroed in on the designing executions of caudal components of anguilliform, subcarangiform, subcarangiform, thunniform and ostraciiform swimming modes.


Robot • Fish • Propulsive • Mechanisms


For a really long time, remotely worked and independent submerged robots have been a decision for an enormous sort of submerged missions. Present day industry faces significant changes that request an increment of train proficient vehicles than the utilization of ordinary pushed ones. Also an expensive interest of various missions and tasks sending customary submerged vehicles. Various electric turning actuators are broadly conveyed for self-pushed marine vehicles utilizing impelling rotors. Turning electric actuators can manage the cost of accuracy and keep force extents extra time. In any case, impelling actuators are unbending gadgets addressing impressive energy utilization, adding mass, latency and grating to a mechanical framework. Rotating based driving activation frameworks are intrinsically loud and are inclined to hurt underwater fauna and vegetation. This smaller than expected survey presents important distributed executions of bioinspired automated fish. As opposed to looking at changed mechanical turns of events, it is purposed to delineate essential thoughts of mechanical arrangements used to carry out undulatory caudal frameworks [1].

Various survey papers on a robot fishes have detailed a variety of normal speculations on natural fish-enlivened robots and bionics, an extensive number of which are summed up in work. The current composition explicitly centers around caudal movement components sent in various mechanical executions that fall into five general swimming modes: anguilliform, subcarangiform, carangiform, thunniform and ostraciiform. Subsequently, blade based natural species are significant models, which rouse to construct an assortment of fake biomechanical models proficient to imitate organic effective outer muscle designs to further develop designing plans [2].

The physiology and properties of muscle fiber sorts of fish, their standards of activation and control has previously been portrayed. Additionally, the internal strong and ligament mathematical construction for swimming of cetaceans were accounted. Moreover, different relative investigations on fish-propelled robots have been accounted for. For example, control of explicit headway designs, advancement of robot fish stages, control and displaying, examination on automated swimming motion, for example, multimode swimming, direction following, mobility, bothers and power-proficiency. Also, significant investigations of natural life structures, swimming modes and motion, which uncover activation highlights were accounted [3].

This composition is coordinated in the accompanying areas. Segment 2 gives a short portrayal on the basics of fish swimming and its headway material science. Segment 3 portrays fundamental anguilliform mechanical fish. Segment 4 talks about a few caudal systems on subcarangiform robots. Area 5 presents the carangiform sorts of fake fish. Area 6 portrays current advancements on thunniform-like automated fish. Segment 7 depicts pertinent caudal components carried out in ostraciiform robots [4].

Fish swimming biomechanics

This segment presents a few consensuses on undulatory swimmer fishes and their propulsive biomechanical structures. Fishes' biomechanical effectiveness to swim displays contrasts as per their body shape, skeletal designs for versatility and hydrodynamic movement waves performed for drive and mobility. Fish-motivated robots might be worked on in their plan by considering internal and outside powers engaged with the hydrodynamic headway process. Achieving a significant reasonableness might rely upon velocity modalities and hydrodynamic situations. The body of fish's swimming hydrodynamic connection powers: drag and push apply on a level plane, while lift, lightness and weight apply upward. The hydrodynamic consistent precise direction movements are dissected as far as the roll-pitch-yaw Euler points. In this way, the body of the fish is intensified by propulsive components (e.g., balances and outer muscle parts), which are fragments competent to apply hydrodynamic powers. The fish's body propulsive components favorably produce direct and precise energy during a train cooperation with the water encompassing it.

Biomechanical and morphological contrasts of fishes display normal propulsive undulatory movements in view of swimming waves, basically including wave-like along caudal body fragments. Five key caudal-based velocity kinds of fish's undulatory pushing modes, which will be examined in the accompanying areas. Undulatory swimming exchanges the direct energy to the limit's contiguous liquid by means of the drag powers and thus yields changes of speed. Consequently, while acting powers and minutes are almost offset regarding a receptive hydrodynamic climate, fishes fundamentally arrive at a consistent speed, generally a lift and a speed increase are created (i.e., impacts of height or potentially slowing down). Swimming speed increase response is a consequence of inertial powers created by water obstruction around the fish's limit happening during accelerating regarding hydrodynamic changes. For example, the fish's lift force is capable when it is opposite to the hydrodynamic caudal/stream bearing. In like manner, the fish's body shape causes explicit stream designs because of the hydrodynamic stream drag pressure. In this manner, the swimming drag is a grinding between fish's skin and a limit layer of water. Summarizing every one of these fish's biomechanical hydrodynamic train properties, various groups of fish can normally move, speed up and voyage. Besides, fish are highlighted by showing specific swimming abilities like skimming, fly impetus, tunneling, bouncing and, surprisingly, flying.

Anguilliform swimmers (i.e., muraenidae, snakes, eels, and so on) are comprised by propulsive body's components that permit the entire fish's spine performing wide sufficiency undulation as a method for a submerged motion. Natural anguilliform hydrodynamic propulsive proficiency has been concentrated beforehand. In this sort of headway, no less than one complete frequency should be performed by a body to do either longitudinal removals or sidelong moves. Normal anguilliform-type robot fish are worked with sets of measured joins that are sequentially associated, named impelling components, which work in a way that permits either wide or slender undulatory waves.

Sub-carangiform swimmers (e.g., salmon, sturgeon, and so forth) perform impressive longer undulation waves to engage a push movement, which is restricted exclusively in its body's back segment, beginning from extremely close to its head. Consequently, the caudal blade train process relies upon an incitation of various muscles along an outer muscle framework. Concerning the sub-carangiform type robots, they are intended to correspondingly keep a broad piece of its front part unbending during swimming. Dissimilar to counterfeit anguilliform structures, bio-inspired sub-carangiform robots show higher direct speeds.

The ribs are precisely joined by sidelong spring-based muscles worked of shape memory amalgam (SMA). SMAs are specific sorts of cutting edge materials, which are twisted by outside powers at a particular temperature, but being warmed or cooled, they re-establish their unique shape. Hence, the combination obviously have a thermo-mechanical memory. Subsequently, such kind of a robot fish is executed with parallel muscles working unfairly, pulling and delivering. SMA-based muscles are constrained by changing their temperature by driving electrical info flows. A comparable caudal system however with various innovation was introduced where rather than utilizing SMA-based springs, the fish swimming movement was performed by sending five ribs pulled by wires inside a consistent body structure.

The carangiform swimmers send a front portion of their body, and their biomechanical nature is the quickest swimming, everything being equal. This mode is displayed by a variety of vertebrates, for example, swordfish, bonefish, goliath trevally, and so on. Various horizontal developments fundamentally happen at a caudal balance applying more than 90% of the push and at a region close to a thin peduncle. By the by, carangiform outer muscle presents a relative inflexibility, undermining its quick capacity and turning moves. Some unique designing ways to deal with biomechanical carangiform swimmers development. Various improvements of carangiform mechanical fish utilize delicate materials designed with various solidness for its caudal blade. This smaller than usual audit acclimatized not many of the fundamental thoughts on brilliant caudal propulsive instruments of various counterfeit fish types. The caudal components were ordered by the usually known five undulation [5,6].

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


  1. Salazar Salazar, R., Fuentes V. and Abdelkefi A. "Classification of biological and bioinspired aquatic systems: A review." Ocean Eng 148 (2018): 75-114.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Brauer Fred. “Some simple epidemic models.” Math Biosci Eng 3 (2006): 1-15.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Castillo-Chavez, Carlos and Baojun Song. “Dynamical models of tuberculosis and their applications.” Math Biosci Eng 1 (2004): 361–404.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Cooper, Ian, Argha Mondal and Chris G. Antonopoulos. "A SIR model assumption for the spread of COVID-19 in different communities." Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 139 (2020): 110057.
  8.  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Dushoff, Jonathan, Wenzhang Huang and Carlos Castillo-Chavez. “Backwards bifurcations and catastrophe in simple models of fatal diseases.J Math Biol 36 (1998): 227-248.
  10.  Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Greenhalgh Greenhalgh, David, and Martin Griffiths. "Backward bifurcation, equilibrium and stability phenomena in a three-stage extended BRSV epidemic model." J Math Biol 59 (2009):1-36.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1282

Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics received 1282 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Applied & Computational Mathematics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward