GET THE APP

Revolutionizing Electrochemical Biosensors: Innovations in Biomolecular Immobilization Substrates
..

Biosensors & Bioelectronics

ISSN: 2155-6210

Open Access

Commentary - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 3

Revolutionizing Electrochemical Biosensors: Innovations in Biomolecular Immobilization Substrates

Ivan De Sousa*
*Correspondence: Ivan De Sousa, Department of Bioengineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany, Email:
Department of Bioengineering, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany

Received: 01-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. jbsbe-23-106388; Editor assigned: 03-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. P-106388; Reviewed: 15-Jun-2023, QC No. Q-106388; Revised: 20-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. R-106388; Published: 27-Jun-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2155-6210.2023.14.386
Citation: Sousa, Ivan De. “Revolutionizing Electrochemical Biosensors: Innovations in Biomolecular Immobilization Substrates.” J Biosens Bioelectron 14 (2023): 386.
Copyright: © 2023 Sousa ID. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

A typical bio-electrochemical sensor is an analytical device that integrates a biorecognition component termed a receptor with an EC transducer. Electrochemical biosensors have emerged as powerful tools for rapid and sensitive detection of biomolecules in various applications, including medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and food safety. Central to the performance of these biosensors is the immobilization of biomolecules, such as enzymes or antibodies, onto a solid substrate. This immobilization process plays a critical role in enhancing the sensitivity, stability, and selectivity of the biosensors. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in developing innovative substrate materials for biomolecular immobilization, aiming to overcome the limitations of traditional approaches and revolutionize the field of electrochemical biosensors [1].

Description

A typical electrochemical biosensors has major 5 components:

Bioreceptor: Any organic body that fundamentally detects a specific molecule from the analyte of interest while remaining insensitive towards any other interfering species. Enzymes, nucleic acid, antibodies, and microbes are some examples of biorecognition components.

Transducer: A transducer is an element that competently transforms the change in physicochemical properties (i.e., electrical current, voltage) of an electroactive species from an analyte into a valid measurable response/analytical signal.

Amplifier: The electrical signals are detected and amplified by a signal amplifier, and the amplified signals are sent to the signal processor.

Signal processor: The processor converts the signal into a readable form and prepares it for display in terms of images, graphs, voltammograms, or numbers.

Display unit: This unit consists of a user interpretation system that reproduces curves/ graphs/ voltammograms or understandable values by the users.

Bio-electrochemical sensors are a fundamental space of present day insightful science; notwithstanding, lately, they have ascended to turn into an arising area of interdisciplinary exploration that spans the standards of essential science and basics of miniature/nanotechnology and gadgets. Bioelectrochemistry alludes to the compound science worried about proton-electron move and the transportation including biomolecules and terminal responses of redox natural particles [2]. Using EC biosensors, a biological event can be converted directly into an electronic signal. In recent years, researchers have explored a wide range of novel substrate materials that offer unique advantages for biomolecular immobilization within electrochemical biosensors. These materials include nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, and metal nanoparticles, as well as polymeric materials with tailored properties. These innovative substrates provide several benefits, including increased surface area, enhanced biocompatibility, improved stability, and improved electron transfer kinetics [3].

Additionally, they offer the potential for precise control over the immobilization process, allowing for optimal orientation and accessibility of the biomolecules, ultimately leading to improved sensor performance. Moreover, advancements in nanofabrication techniques have enabled the development of nanostructured substrates with precisely engineered surface topography and functionalization, further enhancing the immobilization efficiency [4]. These nanostructured substrates exhibit unique properties, such as increased surface roughness, controlled pore size distribution, and hierarchical architectures, which facilitate higher loading capacity and improved mass transport of biomolecules. Furthermore, surface modification techniques, including selfassembled monolayers, polymer brushes, and bio conjugation strategies, have been employed to introduce specific chemical functionalities onto the substrate surface, enabling precise control over biomolecular immobilization and reducing non-specific adsorption [5].

Conclusion

The field of electrochemical biosensors is being revolutionized by the continuous advancements in biomolecular immobilization substrates. The innovative materials and techniques discussed in this paper offer immense potential for enhancing the performance of electrochemical biosensors. These advancements enable improved sensitivity, selectivity, stability, and response times, making them highly attractive for a wide range of applications in healthcare, environmental monitoring, and food safety. However, challenges remain, such as scalability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term stability of these innovative substrate materials. Future research should focus on addressing these challenges, as well as exploring synergistic approaches that combine multiple substrate materials and surface modification strategies to further advance electrochemical biosensors and enable their widespread adoption in various fields. With continued progress in this area, electrochemical biosensors will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in revolutionizing diagnostics and monitoring, leading to improved healthcare outcomes and a safer environment for all.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

  1. Nagel, B., H. Dellweg and L. M. Gierasch. "Glossary for chemists of terms used in biotechnology (IUPAC Recommendations 1992)." Pure Appl Chem 64 (1992): 143-168.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Grieshaber, Dorothee, Robert MacKenzie, Janos Vörös and Erik Reimhult. "Electrochemical biosensors-sensor principles and architectures." Sensors 8 (2008): 1400-1458.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Menon, Shalini, Manna Rachel Mathew, Sonia Sam and K. Keerthi, et al. "Recent advances and challenges in electrochemical biosensors for emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases." J Electroanal Chem 878 (2020): 114596.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Zhao, Wenhao, Shulin Tian, Lei Huang and Ke Liu, et al. "A smartphone-based biomedical sensory system." Analyst 145 (2020): 2873-2891.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Teymourian, Hazhir, Abbas Barfidokht and Joseph Wang. "Electrochemical glucose sensors in diabetes management: An updated review (2010–2020)." Chem Soc Rev 49 (2020): 7671-7709.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1751

Biosensors & Bioelectronics received 1751 citations as per Google Scholar report

Biosensors & Bioelectronics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward