Molecular Computational Tools and their Uses in Bioinformatics

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology

ISSN: 0974-7230

Open Access

Opinion - (2022) Volume 15, Issue 3

Molecular Computational Tools and their Uses in Bioinformatics

Elisha Stewart*
*Correspondence: Elisha Stewart, Department of Information Science, University of Bergen, Norway, Email:
Department of Information Science, University of Bergen, Norway

Received: 07-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. Jcsb-22-62588; Editor assigned: 09-Mar-2022, Pre QC No. P-62588; Reviewed: 23-Mar-2022, QC No. 62588; Revised: 28-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. R-62588; Published: 04-Apr-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/jcsb.2022.15.406
Citation: Stewart, Elisha. “Molecular Computational Tools and their Uses in Bioinformatics.” J Comput Sci Syst Biol 15 (2022): 406.
Copyright: © 2022 Stewart E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


This text makes extensive use of the Python 3 programming language, as well as a standard set of numerical and data visualization tools that are widely used in commercial applications, scientific experiments, and open-source projects. Python has attracted supporters from a wide range of professions that rely on data to draw conclusions. By learning Python, you will be joining a million-person community of software developers and data scientists. A Python programme can be run on any computer, regardless of its manufacturer or operating system, as long as the language is supported. Many pages on this site contain Python code [1-3] that can be run. We encourage you to run and experiment with this code to ensure that you understand what it is doing.

Clicking on the "Interact" links at the top of these pages is one way to do so. This will launch a cloud-based computer capable of running the code. You do not need to install anything on your computer because your web browser acts as an interface to that machine. Modern data analysis employs techniques from a variety of disciplines, including statistics and machine learning. Statistics is the body of knowledge that deals with drawing conclusions from incomplete data. In other words, statistics enables us to reason about data in the face of uncertainty. We will use statistical tools such as hypothesis testing and tools for predicting new data. We will take a different approach to statistical teaching because we are doing data science. Coding is at the heart of data analysis in data science. Coding provides us with a much more powerful set of tools than was previously available. This has significant implications not only for analysis but also for teaching. The advantages for analysis include the ability to obtain, clean, and analyse a much broader range of data. It becomes natural to extend our analytical methods to techniques based on computation, such as machine learning.


The advantages for teachers are twofold. The first advantage is our ability to analyse real-world data. Because our tools have more power and range, we can analyse real-world, messy data rather than cleaned-up toy datasets, so you'll be better prepared to analyse the real data you'll soon have to deal with in your education and work. Individuals who study data science are able to apply these techniques to their work, scientific endeavours, and personal decisions. Critical thinking has long been associated with rigorous education, but critiques are often most effective when backed up by data. Inductive reasoning is used in critical analysis of any aspect of the world, whether it is business or social science. Conclusions are rarely proven outright, but only supported by the available evidence. Data science allows you to make precise, dependable, and quantitative arguments about any set of observations. With unprecedented access to information and computing, critical thinking about any aspect of the world that can be measured would be insufficient without the inferential techniques at the heart of data science.

Computational tools are routinely used for gene characterization, protein structural and physiochemical properties determination, phylogenetic analyses, and simulations to study how biomolecules interact in a living cell. Although these tools cannot generate information as reliable as experimentation, which is costly, time consuming, and tedious, in silico analyses can still help to make an informed decision about whether or not to conduct a costly experiment. A druggable molecule, for example, must have certain ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) properties in order to pass clinical trials. If a substance does it is likely that it will be rejected if it lacks the required ADMETs [4,5] To avoid such failures, various bioinformatics tools for predicting ADMET properties have been developed, allowing researchers to screen a large number of compounds to select the most druggable molecule before launching clinical trials.


Previously, a number of reviews on various specialised aspects of bioinformatics were written. However, none of these articles make it appropriate for a scientist who is not involved in computational biology. Here, we take advantage of the opportunity to introduce various bioinformatics tools to a non-specialist reader in order to assist him or her in extracting useful information about his or her project. As a result, we focused only on areas where these tools could be extremely useful in extracting useful information from biological data.


  1. Al-Hashimi, Nessreen A and Yasser HA Hussein. "Ab initio study on the formation of triiodide CT complex from the reaction of iodine with 2, 3-diaminopyridine.Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 75 (2010): 198-202.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Moorthy N, PC Jobe Prabakar, S. Ramalingam and G. V. Pandian, et al. "Vibrational, NMR and UV–visible spectroscopic investigation and NLO studies on benzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone using computational calculations." J Phys Chem Solids 91 (2016): 55-68.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Ponhong, Kraingkrai, Sam-ang Supharoek and Watsaka Siriangkhawut, et al. "A rapid and sensitive spectrophotometric method for the determination of benzoyl peroxide in wheat flour samples." J Food Drug Anal 23 (2015): 652-659.
  6. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  7. Paul, Bijan Kumar, Subrata Mahanta and Rupashree Balia Singh, et al. "A DFT-based theoretical study on the photophysics of 4-hydroxyacridine: single-water-mediated excited state proton transfer." J Phys Chem A 114 (2010): 2618-2627.
  8. Google Scholar, Indexed at

  9. Lu, Yun-Xiang, Jian-Wei Zou and Yan-Hua Wang, et al. "Theoretical investigations of the C–X/π interactions between benzene and some model halocarbons.Chem phys 334 (2007): 1-7.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

50+ Million Readerbase

Journal Highlights

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2087

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology received 2087 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Computer Science & Systems Biology peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward