Kidney Disease in Poor and Disadvantaged Regions

William Fred^* and Emmy Warld
^*Correspondence: William Fred, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, The University of California, San Francisco, Email:

Introduction

Indigenous Australians are disadvantaged in a variety of socioeconomic and health indices when compared to other Australians. End-stage renal disease (ESRD)—the irreversible preterminal phase of chronic renal failure— is about nine times more common among Indigenous Australians than it is among non-indigenous Australians when adjusted for age and gender. The standardised ESRD incidence varies dramatically from urban to remote areas, ranging from 20 to more than 30 times the national incidence [1-5]. We talk about how kidney disease affects Indigenous Australians and their communities. We investigate the links between disadvantages, which is frequently accompanied by geographic isolation, and the onset of renal disease as well as its development to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [3].

Description

Kidney disease

Our concept is likely to be relevant to understanding renal disease trends in other high-risk populations, such as indigenous peoples in rich countries and people in developing countries. Analogous pathways could also be important to other chronic diseases including diabetes and cardiovascular disease [6]. We will be better positioned to support evidence-based solutions, both within and beyond the scope of the health-care system, to address the excess burden of kidney and other chronic diseases among impacted groups if we can confirm the multiple paths from deprivation to human biology. End-stage renal disease (ESRD), the irreversible preterminal phase of chronic renal failure, is treated by haemodialysis. Without therapy, someone with ESRD will die. Treatment for ESRD is commonly available in the developed world, and it consists of either continuous dialysis (the majority of which is haemodialysis) or kidney transplantation [7]. Haemodialysis is an expensive tertiary care service that is usually only available in major cities. Remote total Australian population villages like Kintore and Kiwirrkura are home to nearly one-fifth of Indigenous Australians, compared to fewer than one-fifth of the.

Disadvantaged

According to a study evaluating the repercussions of late referral for specialised care, nearly 40% of Indigenous ESRD patients required dialysis within three months after being sent to a nephrologist. Not only is the danger of major problems with renal biopsy higher in patients nearing dialysis, but biopsy specimens are often uninformative, exhibiting only non-specific indications of scarring and atrophy [8]. As a result, performing a kidney biopsy to help establish a diagnosis is linked with an increased risk of complications and a low diagnostic yield in over 40% of indigenous ESRD patients. Indigenous patients who were referred late were three times as likely as those who were not referred late to have an unclear diagnosis.

Conclusion

Tertiary prevention initiatives, designed to improve access to renal transplantation and to improve communication between health-care providers and Indigenous ESRD patients, are required to improve ESRD treatment outcomes. However, an emphasis on primary and secondary prevention would result in improvements in health above and beyond the prevention or amelioration of ESRD.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of eGFR study participants, study staff, and partner organisations and the eGFR Study Investigators not included as co-authors on this manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

REFERENCES

1. Atkins, Robert C. "How bright is their future?."  Med J Aust 174 (2001): 489-490.

Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Barker, David J. and Clive Osmond. "Inequalities in health in Britain: specific explanations in three Lancashire towns." Br Med J 294 (1987): 749-752.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Dudley, Christopher RK, Bernard Keavney, Irene M. Stratton, Robert C. Turner and Peter J. Ratcliffe. "UK prospective diabetes study XV: relationship of renin-angiotensin system gene polymorphisms with microalbuminuria in NIDDM." Kidney Int 48 (1995): 1907-1911.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Joseph, KS and Michael S. Kramer. "Review of the evidence on fetal and early childhood antecedents of adult chronic disease." Epidemiol Rev 18 (1996): 158-174.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Lee, Amanda J., Kerin O'dea and John D. Mathews. "Apparent dietary intake in remote Aboriginal communities." Aus J Pub Health 18 (1994): 190-197.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

6. Rowley, KG., DM Iser, JD Best and R McDermott, et al. "Albuminuria in Australian Aboriginal people: prevalence and associations with components of the metabolic syndrome." Diabetologia 43 (2000): 1397-1403.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

7. Williams, DRR, PS Moffitt, JS Fisher and HV Bashir. "Diabetes and glucose tolerance in New South Wales coastal Aborigines: possible effects of non-Aboriginal genetic admixture." Diabetologia 30 (1987): 72-77.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

8. Pettitt, David J., Kirk A. Aleck, H. Robert Baird and Michael J. Carraher, et al. "Congenital susceptibility to NIDDM: role of intrauterine environment." Diabetes 37 (1988): 622-628.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at