Commentary - (2025) Volume 10, Issue 2
Received: 01-May-2025, Manuscript No. jibdd-25-165634;
Editor assigned: 03-May-2025, Pre QC No. P-165634;
Reviewed: 17-May-2025, QC No. Q-165634;
Revised: 22-May-2025, Manuscript No. R-165634;
Published:
29-May-2025
, DOI: 10.37421/2476-1958.2025.10.248
Citation: Ansona, Havila. “Food Additives and Emulsifiers as Triggers of Mucosal Inflammation in IBD: A Review of Emerging Evidence.” J Inflamm Bowel Dis 10 (2025): 248.
Copyright: © 2025 Ansona H. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Food additives encompass a wide variety of substances used to preserve, flavor, or color food. Emulsifiers, a subset of food additives, are particularly prevalent in processed foods, where they help blend ingredients that would otherwise separate, such as oil and water. Common emulsifiers like Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and Polysorbate 80 (P80) are found in a range of products from salad dressings to baked goods. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the consumption of emulsifiers can promote intestinal inflammation by disturbing the gut microbiome. In particular, these emulsifiers have been shown to increase the abundance of pro-inflammatory bacteria and decrease beneficial microbial populations [2]. This shift in microbiota composition, known as dysbiosis, can enhance intestinal permeability, often referred to as "leaky gut," which is thought to allow harmful bacteria and toxins to translocate into the bloodstream, triggering immune responses that contribute to mucosal inflammation and tissue damage. Several studies have illustrated the direct effects of emulsifiers on intestinal cells and immune responses. For instance, exposure to emulsifiers like CMC and P80 has been shown to stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in both in vitro and in vivo models. These cytokines promote the activation of immune cells and the perpetuation of inflammatory pathways that characterize IBD. Furthermore, emulsifiers can exacerbate the Th17 immune response, a key driver of inflammation in IBD. This immune dysregulation is thought to heighten the severity of the disease and may also contribute to the development of extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD, such as arthritis and skin conditions [3].
Additionally, food additives and emulsifiers are implicated in altering the mucosal barrier function. The integrity of the intestinal epithelium is crucial in maintaining gut homeostasis and preventing the passage of harmful substances. Emulsifiers have been shown to disrupt tight junction proteins, which are responsible for sealing the gaps between epithelial cells. This leads to a compromised mucosal barrier, further facilitating the entry of bacteria and their products into the deeper layers of the gut lining, where they can provoke an immune response [4]. As a result, the combination of microbiome dysbiosis, increased intestinal permeability, and heightened immune activation may create a perfect storm for the initiation and exacerbation of IBD. Despite the growing body of evidence suggesting that food additives and emulsifiers play a role in IBD inflammation, much of the research is still in its early stages, particularly in human studies. While animal models provide valuable insights, they do not always translate directly to human disease, and the long-term effects of emulsifier consumption in IBD patients remain unclear. Additionally, the variability in individual responses to food additives, influenced by genetic factors, gut microbiota composition, and the presence of other environmental triggers, complicates the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Furthermore, many of the studies conducted have focused on isolated emulsifiers rather than real-world dietary patterns, which include a variety of additives and other pro-inflammatory foods [5].
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at
Google Scholar Cross Ref Indexed at