Exploring Spatial Learning and Memory in Rodents through the Morris Water Task

Charles Vorhees^*
*Correspondence: Charles Vorhees, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA, Email:

Introduction

Morris water task (MWT) is a behavioral test used in neuroscience research to evaluate spatial learning and memory in rodents. The test involves placing the rodent in a pool of water and measuring its ability to locate a hidden platform. It was developed by Richard G. Morris in 1981 and has since been widely used in research on the neural mechanisms underlying spatial navigation and memory [1,2].

Description

The Morris water task is based on the idea that rodents are motivated to escape from water and will use spatial cues to locate a hidden platform that allows them to escape. The test requires a circular pool, typically about 1.5 meters in diameter and 50-70 centimeters deep, filled with opaque water that is made opaque by adding a non-toxic dye. A platform is submerged just below the surface of the water in one quadrant of the pool. The platform can be made of a variety of materials, but is typically white, circular and about 10-15 centimeters in diameter. During the test, the rodent is placed in the pool and allowed to swim freely until it finds the hidden platform. The starting position of the rodent is randomized across trials to prevent the development of a fixed swim pattern. The time taken by the rodent to find the platform (latency) is recorded, as is the path taken by the rodent to reach the platform (swim path). Once the rodent has found the platform, it is allowed to rest on it for a short period before being removed from the pool. This rest period is intended to allow the rodent to associate the spatial cues in the environment with the location of the platform [3].

The Morris water task can be used to assess several different aspects of spatial learning and memory. One commonly used measure is latency to find the platform, which provides an index of the speed of learning. Animals that learn the task quickly will have a shorter latency than those that take longer to learn. Another measure is swim path, which provides information about the strategies used by the rodent to locate the platform. For example, rodents that swim directly to the platform using a direct route will have a shorter swim path than those that use a more indirect route. Swim speed can also be measured, which can provide information about the general motor ability of the animal. One advantage of the Morris water task is that it can be used to evaluate the effects of experimental manipulations on spatial learning and memory. For example, the task has been used to study the effects of drugs, genetic mutations and brain lesions on spatial learning and memory. In addition, the task can be modified in various ways to investigate different aspects of spatial learning and memory. For example, the platform can be moved to different locations within the pool to test spatial flexibility, or the pool can be rotated to test the ability of rodents to use extra maze cues to locate the platform [4].

However, the Morris water task is not without limitations. One potential limitation is that the task requires a relatively large amount of space and equipment, which can make it difficult to use in some laboratory settings. In addition, the task can be stressful for rodents, which can affect their performance. This stress can be reduced by acclimating the rodents to the water prior to testing, but this can also affect their performance by reducing their motivation to escape the water. Finally, the task may be affected by factors such as visual acuity, swimming ability and motivation, which can complicate interpretation of the results [5].

Conclusion

In conclusion, despite these limitations, the Morris water task remains a valuable tool for investigating the neural mechanisms underlying spatial learning and memory in rodents. The task has been used to make significant contributions to our understanding of the role of the hippocampus and other brain regions in spatial navigation and memory and continues to be widely used in both basic and applied neuroscience research.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

1. Lane, Roy A. and Graham Buckton. "The novel combination of dynamic vapour sorption gravimetric analysis and near infra-red spectroscopy as a hyphenated technique." Int J Pharm 207 (2000): 49-56.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Luner, Paul E. and Jeffery J. Seyer. "Assessment of crystallinity in processed sucrose by near‐infrared spectroscopy and application to lyophiles." J Pharm Sci 103 (2014): 2884-2895.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Morita, Hiroyuki, Stefka Atanassova and Dimitar Djilianov. "Water molecular structure underpins extreme desiccation tolerance of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis." Int J Pharm (2019): 23-32

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Zotz, Gerhard and Klaus Winter. "Short-term regulation of crassulacean acid metabolism activity in a tropical hemiepiphyte, clusia uvitana." Plant Physiol 102 (1993): 835-841.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Krawczyk, Hedwig, Jens Zinke, Nicola Browne and Ulrich Struck, et al. "Corals reveal ENSO-driven synchrony of climate impacts on both terrestrial and marine ecosystems in Northern Borneo." Sci Rep 10 (2020): 366-370.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at