GET THE APP

Ethical Considerations in Nursing-led Clinical Trials
Journal of Advanced Practices in Nursing

Journal of Advanced Practices in Nursing

ISSN: 2573-0347

Open Access

Perspective - (2025) Volume 10, Issue 1

Ethical Considerations in Nursing-led Clinical Trials

Klint Alwin*
*Correspondence: Klint Alwin, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK, Email:
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK

Received: 27-Dec-2025, Manuscript No. apn-25-162956; Editor assigned: 30-Dec-2024, Pre QC No. P-162956; Reviewed: 10-Jan-2025, QC No. Q-162956; Revised: 17-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. R-162956; Published: 24-Jan-2025 , DOI: 10.37421/2573-0347.2025.10.409
Citation: Alwin, Klint. “Ethical Considerations in Nursing-led Clinical Trials.” J Adv Practice Nurs 10 (2025): 409.
Copyright: © 2025 Alwin K. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Ethical considerations in nursing-led clinical trials are paramount to ensuring the integrity of research, the protection of participants and the advancement of healthcare. Nursing-led clinical trials play a critical role in developing evidence-based practices, improving patient outcomes and refining treatment protocols. These trials require adherence to ethical principles, which include respect for autonomy, beneficence, no maleficence and justice. One of the most fundamental ethical considerations in nursing-led clinical trials is informed consent. Participants must be provided with clear, comprehensive and understandable information about the study, including its purpose, procedures, risks, benefits and alternatives. Ensuring voluntary participation without coercion is essential and participants should have the right to withdraw at any time without repercussions [1]. Nurses, as patient advocates, play a crucial role in facilitating informed consent by ensuring that individuals fully comprehend the implications of their participation. The principle of beneficence obligates researchers to maximize potential benefits while minimizing harm. Nursing-led trials must be designed with the patient's well-being as a priority. This includes conducting rigorous risk assessments before initiating the study and implementing measures to protect participants from unnecessary risks. Researchers must also be prepared to halt the trial if evidence suggests that participants are experiencing harm or if the intervention proves ineffective. No maleficence, or the duty to do no harm, requires nursing researchers to prioritize patient safety. This involves continuous monitoring for adverse events and implementing safeguards such as data monitoring committees. Ethical clinical trials necessitate that nurses remain vigilant and responsive to any signs of distress or negative reactions among participants. Additionally, maintaining strict adherence to established protocols and regulatory requirements is essential to prevent harm. Justice in nursing-led clinical trials ensures the fair distribution of risks and benefits. It is critical to recruit diverse populations to avoid biases that could limit the generalizability of research findings. Equitable participant selection prevents the exploitation of vulnerable groups while ensuring that no specific population bears an undue burden of risk. Ethical recruitment strategies should avoid targeting economically disadvantaged individuals who may feel pressured to participate for financial incentives [2].

Description

Confidentiality and privacy are also key ethical concerns in nursing-led research. Protecting participant data is crucial in maintaining trust and compliance with legal standards such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Secure data storage, anonymization techniques and restricted access to sensitive information help safeguard participant confidentiality. Conflicts of interest must be transparently disclosed and managed to maintain research integrity. Nursing researchers should avoid financial or professional incentives that could compromise their objectivity. Ethical oversight committees, such as Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and ethics committees, play a crucial role in ensuring that nursing-led trials adhere to established ethical guidelines. Cultural competence is another essential ethical consideration in nursing-led clinical trials. Researchers must respect the cultural values, beliefs and traditions of diverse populations to ensure ethical and sensitive interactions. Misinterpretation or disregard for cultural differences can lead to mistrust, reluctance to participate and ethical breaches. Providing culturally appropriate materials and employing diverse research teams can enhance inclusivity and ethical adherence [3]. Post-trial responsibilities are also significant in nursing-led research. Participants should have access to any beneficial treatments discovered during the study. Additionally, researchers must disseminate findings transparently to contribute to the broader scientific community and inform clinical practice. Ethical dissemination includes publishing results regardless of outcome, ensuring credibility and reducing publication bias. Ultimately, ethical considerations in nursing-led clinical trials revolve around upholding the dignity, rights and safety of participants. Nurses, as both researchers and patient advocates, bear the responsibility of fostering an ethical research environment. Through strict adherence to ethical principles, transparent communication and continuous oversight, nursing-led clinical trials can contribute meaningfully to the advancement of healthcare while maintaining the highest ethical standards [4]. Nursing-led clinical trials play a crucial role in advancing patient care, yet they must adhere to strict ethical standards to protect participants' rights and well-being. Key ethical considerations include informed consent, where participants must fully understand the study's purpose, risks and benefits before enrolling. Patient autonomy is paramount, ensuring individuals can make voluntary decisions without coercion. Additionally, beneficence and non-maleficence guide nurses to prioritize patient welfare, balancing potential benefits against risks. Confidentiality must be maintained to protect participantsâ?? personal health information. Equitable participant selection ensures that vulnerable populations are not exploited. Nurses leading clinical trials must also navigate conflicts of interest, ensuring unbiased research outcomes. Ethical oversight from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) is essential to uphold these standards. By adhering to these principles, nursing-led trials can contribute valuable insights to healthcare while maintaining ethical integrity [5].

Conclusion

Nursing-led clinical trials play a crucial role in advancing patient-centered research, improving healthcare outcomes and expanding the scope of nursing practice. However, these trials must adhere to strict ethical standards to ensure patient safety, informed consent and equitable treatment. Ethical considerations such as patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice remain central to the integrity of these studies. By maintaining rigorous ethical oversight, fostering transparent communication and prioritizing patient welfare, nursing professionals can uphold the highest research standards while driving innovation in healthcare. Ultimately, a strong ethical foundation in nursing-led clinical trials enhances credibility, fosters public trust and contributes to evidence-based nursing practice.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Kanzler, Kathryn E., Donald D. McGeary, Cindy McGeary and Abby E. Blankenship, et al. "Conducting a pragmatic trial in integrated primary care: key decision points and considerations." J Clin Psychol Med Settings29 (2022): 185-194.

Google Scholar    Cross Ref   Indexed at

  1. Bothwell, Laura E., Jeremy A. Greene, Scott H. Podolsky and David S. Jones, et al. "Assessing the gold standard-lessons from the history of RCTs." N Engl J Med 374 (2016): 2175-2181.

Google Scholar   Cross Ref    Indexed at

  1. Fernando-Canavan, Liam, Anthony Gust, Arthur Hsueh and An Tran-Duy, et al. "Measuring the economic impact of hospital-acquired complications on an acute health service." Aust Health Rev 45 (2020): 135-142.

Google Scholar    Cross Ref   Indexed at

  1. Rae, Katherine E., Stephen Isbel and Dominic Upton. "Support surfaces for the treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers: a systematic literature review." J Wound Care27 (2018): 467-474.

Google Scholar   Cross Ref  Indexed at

  1. Nixon, Jane, Gillian Cranny, Cynthia Iglesias and E. Andrea Nelson, et al. "Randomised, controlled trial of alternating pressure mattresses compared with alternating pressure overlays for the prevention of pressure ulcers: PRESSURE (pressure relieving support surfaces) trial." Br Med J 332 (2006): 1413.

Google Scholar     Cross Ref  Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward