Effective Therapeutics for Coronavirus Include Several Novel and Reused Drugs

Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine

ISSN: 2161-105X

Open Access

Commentary - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 8

Effective Therapeutics for Coronavirus Include Several Novel and Reused Drugs

Michael A. Matthay*
*Correspondence: Michael A. Matthay, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Golden Gate University, San Francisco, CA, USA, Email:
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Golden Gate University, San Francisco, CA, USA

Received: 02-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. jprm-22-85332; Editor assigned: 03-Aug-2022, Pre QC No. P-85332; Reviewed: 16-Aug-2022, QC No. Q-85332; Revised: 22-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. R-85332; Published: 29-Aug-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2161-105X.2022.12.617
Citation: Matthay, Michael A. “Effective Therapeutics for Coronavirus Include Several Novel and Reused Drugs" 12 (2022): 617.
Copyright: © 2022 Matthay MA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


The worldwide spread of the Coronavirus pandemic's etiological specialty, Serious Acute Respiratory Syndrome-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is at full force. Although some effective vaccinations are still being distributed, trustworthy antiviral medications against this illness still don't seem to be able to be developed. Reused drugs as well as a few original ones are currently used as coronavirus treatments. Many drugs showed promise in preclinical testing, however a huge portion of these drugs showed virtually little viability in clinical testing. The organisation of treatments through oral or intravenous courses does not adequately target the lung, the primary objective site of sickness for SARS-CoV-2, which is one of the important causes. Higher persuasive parts controlled by these courses may also have negative side effects.

As a result, pharmaceuticals that are breathed in are being tested as an efficient technique for treating Coronavirus, allowing lower dosages while still ensuring higher centralizations of the drug(s) in the lung. The breathed-in therapy combining at least two antiviral drugs will improve effectiveness and lower the risk of selecting for SARS-CoV-2 variants with reduced drug ineffectiveness. Last but not least, a logical framework should be used to deliver the right pharmaceutical combination. With a brief overview of the recently reformulated antiviral agent for SARS-CoV-2 specialists as inhaled information, we evaluate the current therapy for Coronavirus and their limitations. We also look at the benefits of mono and combinational breathed-in treatment. The selection of the appropriate inhalation devices and other important considerations, such as the definitional difficulties, are also discussed.

In December 2019, Wuhan, China, reported the first case of Covid disease 19 (Coronavirus), which has since spread throughout the world and claimed a significant number of lives. SARS-CoV-2 was designated as the coronavirus that causes SARS by the Global Council on Scientific Classification of Infections (ICTV) because of its close phylogenetic relationship to the severe severe respiratory disease Covid (SARS-CoV). In contrast to SARS-CoV and other respiratory diseases including MERS-CoV, Ebola infection, and flu infection, SARS-CoV-2 is more contagious. An enclosed, (+ss) RNA infection known as SARS-CoV-2 is mostly transmitted through the inhalation of exhaled airborne droplets. Therefore, the respiratory tract is the primary location of SARS-CoV-2 contamination due to the high thickness of Pro 2 glycoprotein, the infection's receptor. The infection can gradually move from the respiratory tract and lungs to various locations and organs [15].

The runs, fatigue, fever, migraine, dry hack, lymphopenia, hemoptysis, and a throbbing headache are all common side effects of the coronavirus. Chest radiographs occasionally showed windedness and a reduced blood oxygen level, as well as a penetration in the upper curve of the lung. The presence of Pro 2 on testicular and renal rounded cells makes them more vulnerable to the effects of SARS-CoV-2. A few include anorexia, regurgitating, and constipation.


What is happening is getting worse as more infectious and contagious SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge. Variations are the outcome of adjustments made during an infection's replication cycle, and transformation is the alteration of any hereditary succession (expansion/cancellation/replacement) in comparison to the parent grouping. Currently, the most notable SARS-CoV-2 mutations are alpha (B.1.1.7), beta (B.1.351), gamma (P.1), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529) (WHO 2022b). These variances stand out in different countries and have different highlights. These variations are looked at in detail.



Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.


  1. Chauhan, Gaurav, Marc J Madou and Sourav Kalra. "Nanotechnology for COVID-19: Therapeutics and vaccine research." ACS nano 14 (2020): 7760-7782.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Li Guangdi and Erik De Clercq. "Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)." Nature reviews Drug discovery 19 (2020): 149-150.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Chang, Chun-Chun, Hao-Jen Hsu and Je-Wen Liou. "Computer-aided discovery, design, and investigation of COVID-19 therapeutics." Tzu-Chi Medical Journal 34 (2022): 276.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Moghadam and Solmaz Ohadian. "A review on currently available potential therapeutic options for COVID-19." International Journal of General Medicine 13 (2020): 443.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Corti Davide, Lisa A Purcell, Gyorgy Snell and David Veesler. "Tackling COVID-19 with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies." Cell 184 (2021): 3086-3108.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

50+ Million Readerbase

Recommended Conferences

Journal Highlights

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1347

Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine received 1347 citations as per Google Scholar report

Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward