GET THE APP

Editorial Notes on Marker Gene’s Applications and Significance
..

Journal of Genetics and DNA Research

ISSN: 2684-6039

Open Access

Editorial - (2022) Volume 6, Issue 3

Editorial Notes on Marker Gene’s Applications and Significance


*Correspondence: Tae Keun, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Cologne, Germany, Email:
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Cologne, Germany

Received: 01-May-2022, Manuscript No. jgdr-22-69725; Editor assigned: 04-May-2022, Pre QC No. P-69725; Reviewed: 16-May-2022, QC No. Q-69725; Revised: 22-May-2022, Manuscript No. R-69725; Published: 30-May-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2684- 6039.2022.6.123
Citation: Keun, Tae. “Editorial Notes on Marker Gene's Applications and Significance.” J Genet DNA Res 6 (2022): 123.
Copyright: © 2022 Keun T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

A DNA sequence known as the marker gene is located on chromosomes close to the detectable target. The selectable marker gene is utilised in the creation of genetically modified organisms and plant genetic engineering. The streptomycin-resistant gene, the hygromycin-resistant gene, the gemcitabine gene, and the ampicillin-resistant gene are examples of antibiotic-resistant genes. The usage of these sorts of markers is to achieve a second function in addition to the gene encoding as the function of the selectable marker is known to us. When an antibiotic resistance marker gene is put into a changed cell type, it can grow in antibacterial drugs conditions whereas unaltered cells cannot, which is useful for research on antibiotic resistance cells. Gene sequences known as "screenable biomarkers" are utilised to assess if a cell population has undergone any alterations. The target has been correctly inserted if the screenable marker is present in the transformed cells. Take the gene sequence for the green fluorescent protein as an example [1-3].

The gene is put into the target cells together with a gene for a green fluorescent protein. Under a fluorescent microscope, the cells may glow green, suggesting that they have undergone a transformation if the plasmid successfully incorporated the genes. Blue-white screening, GUS assay, opinion synthesis, and luciferase are examples of screenable indicators. The three most crucial factors in any genetic engineering experiment are the target gene, the plasmid DNA, and the procedure. We wish to learn more about or alter the function of the target gene. This gene is typically well-known. A bacterial extrachromosomal DNA called a plasmid can transmit the gene sequences we want to study. It is a means of moving genetic material. The antibiotic is selected and included in the cell cultures if it inhibits the activity of the target cell. That is, normal cell populations or normal target cells cannot proliferate when cultivated in conditions heavy in antibiotics.

when the gene of interest is combined with an antibiotic-resistant gene sequence. The repeating nucleotide sequences of microsatellite markers, which are polymorphic DNA loci, range in length from 2 to 10 nucleotides. The majority of repetitions within a single microsatellite locus have the same number of nucleotides in the repeated unit, however the quantity of repeats for a given locus might vary, leading to alleles of different lengths that can be examined using fragment analysis by capillary electrophoresis. Because Mendelian inheritance applies to microsatellite markers, length variation analysis is a frequently utilised tool in applications like microsatellite instability (MSI). The size of linkage maps for many plant species was constrained before the development of molecular mapping. The main difficulty in creating linkage maps was the inability to combine several markers into a single stock for genetic research [4,5]. The drawbacks of producing all mutant phenotypes in a single stock were the cause of this inability. Molecular markers are phenotypically neutral since they evaluate the genetic material using common DNA or protein components.

This is a considerable benefit over conventional phenotypic markers. DNA snippets that are connected to a particular region of the genome are known as molecular markers. Short DNA sequences, such as those that surround a single nucleotide polymorphism with a single base-pair alteration, can serve as marker molecules. A longer DNA sequence, such as a microsatellite, which can be anywhere between 10 and 60 base pairs long, can also be used to represent them. Marker molecules called restriction fragment length polymorphisms follow a particular DNA sequence as it passes between cells. It is a kind of molecular marker that works by cloned DNA being hybridised with DNA fragments. Only one clone or restriction enzyme combination has them. Frequently employed in plant breeding, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA molecular markers are based on the cloning of random regions of a plant's genome via polymer chain reaction gene cloning. Isozyme molecular markers are used to identify proteins.

They are designed to identify enzymes that catalyse the same amino acid reaction but have distinct amino acid sequences. A malfunctioning mismatch repair (MMR) protein results in the buildup of insertions or deletions (indels) in microsatellites during replication, which is a kind of genomic instability known as MSI. DNA polymerase errors that occur during replication are fixed by MMR proteins. To do this, they identify a transient insertion-deletion loop created when DNA polymerase falters. Fragment analysis can be used to quickly identify novel alleles at microsatellite loci that occur when cells with a malfunctioning MMR protein accumulate errors that lead to frameshift mutations (indels).

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest associated with this paper.

References

  1. Jelenska J, E. Tietze, J. Tempe and J. Brevet. "Streptothricin resistance as a novel selectable marker for transgenic plant cells." Plant Cell Rep 19 (2000): 298-303.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Maas, Christoph, Craig G. Simpson and Peter Eckes. "Expression of intron modified NPT II genes in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cells." Mol Breed 3 (1997): 15-28.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Kay, Robert A.M.Y. Chan, Mark Daly and Joan McPherson. "Duplication of CaMV 35 S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes." Science 236 (1987): 1299-1302.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Hille, Jacques, Frank Verheggen and Peter Roelvink. "Bleomycin resistance: a new dominant selectable marker for plant cell transformation." Plant Mol Biol 7 (1986): 171-176.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Lonsdale, David M, Suzanne Lindup and Lisa J. Moisan, et al. "Using firefly luciferase to identify the transition from transient to stable expression in bombarded wheat scutellar tissue." Physiol Plant 102 (1998): 447-453.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 3

Journal of Genetics and DNA Research received 3 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Genetics and DNA Research peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward