GET THE APP

Compromise Impact of Polymeric Nano-Medication in Enemy of Malignant Growth Drug Conveyance
..

Research and Reports in Medical Sciences

ISSN: 2952-8127

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 7, Issue 3

Compromise Impact of Polymeric Nano-Medication in Enemy of Malignant Growth Drug Conveyance

Rujiang Ma*
*Correspondence: Rujiang Ma, Department of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin, China, Email:
Department of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin, China

Received: 01-May-2023, Manuscript No. rrms-23-102569; Editor assigned: 03-May-2023, Pre QC No. P-102569; Reviewed: 15-May-2023, QC No. Q-102569; Revised: 22-May-2023, Manuscript No. R-102569; Published: 30-May-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2952-8127.2023.7.109
Citation: Ma, Rujiang. “Compromise Impact of Polymeric Nano-Medication in Enemy of Malignant Growth Drug Conveyance.” Res Rep Med Sci 7 (2023): 109.
Copyright: © 2023 Ma R. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Over the past three decades, significant progress has been made in the field of anti-cancer therapy through extensive research into polymeric nanomedicine. However results of medications, for example, harmfulness are extraordinarily decreased, the remedial adequacy has not been worked on altogether up until this point, which perhaps predominantly due to the compromise impacts between oppositely required elements of nano-meds at various strides in drug conveyance, like delayed blood dissemination versus improved cell take-up, and stable medication maintenance on the way versus responsive delivery in disease cells. For nano-carriers, various functionalities, such as surface charge reversal, shell-shedding, and surface self-assembly properties, have been developed to overcome the trade-off between cellular uptake and blood circulation. These strategies begin by transforming the nano-carriers into a more cell-interactive state to increase cellular uptake and giving them a stealthy character during blood circulation. In order to overcome the trade-off effect between increasing cellular uptake and prolonging blood circulation in order to improve the therapeutic efficacy of anti-cancer drugs, this review summarizes recent developments in the design of powerful nano-carriers.

Keywords

Nano-carrier • Nano-medicine • Anti-cancer drug • Charge reversal • Shell shedding

Introduction

Polymeric nano-medication has emerged as a promising approach for the targeted delivery of anti-cancer drugs, offering potential solutions to overcome the limitations associated with conventional chemotherapy. The field of cancer treatment has witnessed remarkable advancements with the development of polymeric nano-medication, which allows for controlled and sustained drug release, enhanced bioavailability, and improved therapeutic efficacy. This innovative technology holds immense potential to revolutionize the landscape of cancer therapy and significantly impact the fight against malignant tumors. Conventional chemotherapy suffers from several drawbacks, such as non-specific distribution of drugs, poor solubility of therapeutic agents, limited cellular uptake, and severe side effects on healthy tissues. These limitations often compromise the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs and reduce the overall quality of life for cancer patients. Polymeric nano-medication provides a solution by encapsulating therapeutic agents within biocompatible and biodegradable polymers, enabling targeted delivery to cancerous cells while minimizing the exposure of healthy tissues to toxic substances. The unique properties of polymeric nano-medication, such as small size, high surface area-to-volume ratio, and the ability to be surface-modified, facilitate efficient drug encapsulation, prolonged circulation time, and enhanced tumor accumulation. These nano-sized carriers can be functionalized with ligands, antibodies, or peptides that selectively bind to specific receptors overexpressed on cancer cells, thereby improving the targeting efficiency and reducing off-target effects. Additionally, the polymeric matrix can be engineered to respond to various stimuli, such as pH, temperature, enzymes, or light, enabling triggered drug release at the tumor site.

Literature Review

Different proteins would adsorb to the surface of the exogenous nanoparticles and form protein coronas when they enter the systemic circulation. The majority of these proteins are opsonins that bind to the nanoparticles and recognize the macrophage cell surface scavenger receptors. Consequently, macrophage cells of the reticuloendothelial system were able to easily eliminate the nanoparticles. After intravenous injection, the majority of nanoparticles with organic and synthetic surfaces are always quickly cleared from the blood, significantly reducing blood circulation time and accumulation at the tumor site. To prevent undesirable drug leakage during system circulation, the nano-carriers must be sufficiently stable and intact. This is exceptionally difficult, particularly for polymeric nanoparticles shaped by hydrophobic affiliation or electrostatic complexation, in light of the fact that in the limitless weakening climate of blood, nanoparticles will separate rapidly.

Discussion

The field of oncology has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, particularly in drug delivery strategies aimed at improving the effectiveness and specificity of anti-cancer medications. One promising approach is the use of polymeric nano-medication, which involves encapsulating anti-malignant growth drugs within polymeric nanoparticles for targeted delivery. While this technique holds great potential, it is crucial to explore and understand the potential compromises and challenges associated with this approach to ensure its successful implementation. In this discussion, we will examine the compromised impacts of polymeric nano-medication in anti-malignant growth drug delivery. One compromise associated with polymeric nano-medication is the limited drug payload capacity of nanoparticles. Polymeric nanoparticles have size restrictions that can hinder the encapsulation of a substantial quantity of therapeutic agents. This limitation may pose challenges when delivering drugs with high doses or those that require sustained release over an extended period [1].

Polymeric nano-medication relies on controlled release mechanisms to ensure that drugs are delivered at the desired rate and duration. However, maintaining the stability of drugs within polymeric nanoparticles and controlling their release kinetics can be challenging. Factors such as premature drug release, burst release, or drug degradation within the nanoparticle matrix can compromise the overall efficacy of the medication. Polymeric nanoparticles must exhibit excellent biocompatibility to avoid adverse reactions within the body. However, certain polymeric materials used for encapsulation may induce immune responses or toxicity. It is essential to thoroughly evaluate the biocompatibility and potential toxicity of the polymeric materials to ensure their safe and effective use in clinical settings [2].

The pharmacokinetics of polymeric nano-medication can be influenced by factors such as particle size, surface charge, and surface modifications. Achieving optimal drug distribution, accumulation and retention within tumor tissues requires careful consideration of these parameters. Any compromise in achieving effective targeting may result in suboptimal drug delivery and reduced therapeutic efficacy [3]. The impact of polymeric nano-medication on the delivery of anti-cancer drugs goes beyond enhanced targeting and controlled release. These nano-carriers can also overcome physiological barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier, facilitating the delivery of therapeutics to previously inaccessible sites. Furthermore, they can encapsulate a variety of therapeutic agents, including chemotherapeutic drugs, nucleic acids, proteins, and immunotherapeutic agents, offering the potential for combination therapy and personalized medicine approaches. Polymeric nanomedication often involves complex manufacturing processes, which may require specialized equipment and expertise. Scaling up the production of nanoparticles for widespread clinical use can be challenging and may introduce compromises in terms of cost, reproducibility, and quality control [4].

Overcoming these manufacturing hurdles is essential to ensure the accessibility and affordability of polymeric nano-medication. In this context, exploring the compromise impact of polymeric nano-medication in the enemy of malignant growth drug delivery becomes crucial. This entails understanding the benefits and challenges associated with the use of polymeric nanocarriers, evaluating their effectiveness in preclinical and clinical studies, and addressing concerns related to safety, scalability, and regulatory approval. By comprehensively examining the compromise impact, we can harness the full potential of polymeric nano-medication in combating cancer and paving the way for more effective and personalized cancer treatment strategies [5].

We will delve into the various aspects of polymeric nano-medication and its impact on the delivery of anti-cancer drugs. We will discuss the design principles, fabrication methods, and characterization techniques of these nano-carriers. Moreover, we will explore the advantages and limitations of polymeric nanomedication, highlighting its potential to overcome challenges in cancer therapy. By examining the current state of research and development in this field, we aim to provide insights into the future prospects of polymeric nano-medication in revolutionizing cancer treatment and improving patient outcomes [6].

Conclusion

During drug delivery, conventional polymeric nanocarriers that lack specific designs always encounter distinct trade-off effects. Consider, for instance, the trade-off between increased cellular uptake and prolonged circulation time, subtle nano-transporters have delayed blood dissemination time yet diminished cell take-up, while focusing on nano-transporters have improved cell takeup however decreased blood course time. The overall delivery efficiency of nano-carriers can be approximated by looking at the area of the rectangles. A progression of rectangular slanting vertices frames the limit of the orange region comparing to ordinary transporters. Nonetheless, the limit line is curved, suggesting restricted conveyance proficiency of traditional nano-transporters because of the compromise impact. The trade-off effect can be effectively overcome with custom-made nano-carriers that are capable of charge reversal, shell shedding, and surface assembly, resulting in increased cellular uptake and a prolonged circulation time.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Yan, Lina, Jingjing Shen, Jinqiao Wang and Xiaoyan Yang, et al. "Nanoparticle-based drug delivery system: A patient-friendly chemotherapy for oncology." Dose-Response 18 (2020): 1559325820936161.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Cheng, Zhe, Maoyu Li, Raja Dey and Yongheng Chen. "Nanomaterials for cancer therapy: Current progress and perspectives." J Hematol Oncol 14 (2021) 1-27.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Ferlay, Jacques, Murielle Colombet, Isabelle Soerjomataram and Donald M. Parkin, et al. "Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview." Int J Cancer149 (2021) 778-789.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Trac, Noah and Eun Ji Chung. "Overcoming physiological barriers by nanoparticles for intravenous drug delivery to the lymph nodes." EBM 246 (2021): 2358-2371.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Zhang, Di, Jing Zhang, Qian Li and Hailong Tian, et al. "pH-and enzyme-sensitive IR820–paclitaxel conjugate self-assembled nanovehicles for near-infrared fluorescence imaging-guided chemo–photothermal therapy." ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10 (2018) 30092-30102.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Devalapally, Harikrishna, Zhenfeng Duan, Michael V. Seiden and Mansoor M. Amiji. "Paclitaxel and ceramide co‐administration in biodegradable polymeric nanoparticulate delivery system to overcome drug resistance in ovarian cancer." Int J Cancer 121 (2007): 1830-1838.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

arrow_upward arrow_upward