GET THE APP

Biotechniques for the Sustainable Control of Varroa Mites in Honey Bee Colonies
..

Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques

ISSN: 2155-9821

Open Access

Short Communication - (2022) Volume 12, Issue 4

Biotechniques for the Sustainable Control of Varroa Mites in Honey Bee Colonies

Teresina Croce*
*Correspondence: Teresina Croce, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy, Email:
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy

Received: 05-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. Jbpbt-22-68949; Editor assigned: 08-Apr-2022, Pre QC No. P-68949; Reviewed: 19-Apr-2022, QC No. Q-68949; Revised: 26-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. R-68949; Published: 02-May-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2155-9821.2022.12.512
Citation: Croce, Teresina. “Biotechniques for the Sustainable Control of Varroa Mites in Honey Bee Colonies.” J Bioprocess Biotech 12 (2022): 512.
Copyright: © 2022 Croce T. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

Beekeeping, contrasted with other farming exercises, appears to have been examined less according to a financial perspective since it is drilled, much of the time, by specialists while experts exist in additional restricted numbers. In the European Union, beekeeping as a financial movement can be a type of revenue backing and family self-creation, yet little is known with respect to the monetary outcomes and, surprisingly, less about how these may contrast from country with country. Foundations consider beekeeping extremely impossible to miss contrasted with other rural exercises, and the European Union executes three-year intends to help exercises that help beekeepers. Over the most recent 15 years, research has zeroed in more on the worth of the environment benefits that beekeeping accommodates horticulture and biodiversity, as opposed to on the productivity of beekeeping ranches, particularly those that work expertly. The European honey market is vivacious and dynamic, with beekeeping being a generally evolved movement in the European Union, both at proficient (beekeepers with more than 150 hives) and leisure activity levels [1,2]. There are around 620,000 beekeepers in the European Union, of which around 95-97% are non-proficient, representing around 67% of EU hives.

Description

Biotechniques incorporate robot brood evacuation, sovereign confining, and, most as of late, complete brood expulsion; consolidating the fake without brood condition with natural corrosive applications is a supportable system for handling Varroa vermin [3]. The adequacy of these methodologies has been shown in past exploration. Biotechniques require extra work from the beekeeper, to a lesser or more prominent degree, and their reception generally requires a cautious association of the ranch's assets, and specifically the work [4].

Apparently, there are no investigations that have zeroed in on the financial aftereffects of beekeeping ranches that embrace at least one of the strategies to moderate Varroa, from the utilization of acaricides to biotechniques. As is notable, a decrease in the quantity of bumble bee settlements causes significant monetary misfortunes, and the inflated expenses spent to treat honey bee sicknesses lessen the productivity of the area [5].

Conclusion

Varroa is one of the significant dangers that influence bumble bee states, and a few techniques are applied by beekeepers to control Varroa parasites, with biotechnical practices, for example, complete brood expulsion being desirable over substance approaches.

A few examinations on the monetary consequences of beekeeping have been performed, which have zeroed in on expenses and incomes got by beekeeping action at the public level and on investigating the cultural job of this action, particularly connected with fertilization administrations as well as pay improvement.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Chauzat, Marie-Pierre, Laura Cauquil, Lise Roy and Stéphanie Franco, et al. "Demographics of the European apicultural industry." PloS One 8 (2013): e79018.
  2. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  3. Goulson, Dave, Elizabeth Nicholls, Cristina Botías, and Ellen L. Rotheray. "Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers." Sci 347 (2015): 1255957.
  4. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  5. Brščić, Kristina, Tina Šugar and Danijela Poljuha. "An empirical examination of consumer preferences for honey in Croatia." Appl Econ 49 (2017): 5877-5889.
  6. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  7. Ványi, Georgina Árváné, Zsolt Csapó and László Kárpáti. "Evaluation of consumers' honey purchase habits in Hungary." J Food Prod Mark 17 (2011): 227-240.
  8. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  9. Yeow, Steven Ho Chiang, Susan Tee Suan Chin, Jian Ai Yeow and Khong Sin Tan. "Consumer purchase intentions and honey related products." J Mark Res Case Studies (2013): 1.
  10. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 3351

Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques received 3351 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

arrow_upward arrow_upward

https://sekillinickyazma.com.tr/

pinbahis