Addressing Disease Issues in Livestock and Wildlife

Jacquie Tom^*
*Correspondence: Jacquie Tom, Department of Animal Infectious Diseases, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt, Email:

Introduction

The health of domestic animals and wildlife is intricately linked to ecological balance, agricultural productivity, public health, and biodiversity conservation. The emergence and spread of diseases in these populations pose significant challenges, not only for animal welfare but also for economic stability and human health. Understanding the dynamics of disease transmission, identifying risk factors, and implementing effective management strategies are essential for mitigating the impact of infectious diseases. This article explores the key disease challenges facing domestic animals and wildlife, the interconnectedness of their health through the One Health framework, and strategies to tackle these challenges effectively. Domestic animals, including livestock and companion animals, are vulnerable to a wide range of infectious diseases, such as bacterial, viral, parasitic, and fungal infections. Similarly, wildlife species face threats from diseases that can affect populations, ecosystems, and even spill over to domestic animals and humans. The challenges are compounded by factors like globalization, climate change, habitat loss, and the increased movement of animals and people, which facilitate the spread of diseases across regions and species [1-3].

Description

Internal and external parasites, such as ticks, worms, and protozoa, can cause chronic health issues and reduce productivity in livestock. Some diseases are specific to wildlife, such as chytridiomycosis in amphibians and white-nose syndrome in bats. These diseases can cause population declines and disrupt ecosystems. Wildlife can act as reservoirs for new pathogens that may spill over to domestic animals and humans, such as the Ebola virus and coronaviruses. Deforestation, urbanization, and climate change create stress in wildlife populations, making them more susceptible to diseases. Bridging the Gap Between Human, Animal, and Environmental Health. The concept of One Health emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health. Many diseases that affect domestic animals and wildlife are zoonotic, and the health of these populations can directly or indirectly impact human health. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted how diseases can jump from wildlife to humans, with severe global consequences. Understanding the pathways of zoonotic spillover is crucial for preventing future outbreaks. Integrated surveillance systems that monitor disease in domestic animals, wildlife, and humans can help detect outbreaks early and respond effectively. The use of antibiotics in both domestic animals and wildlife management needs to be carefully regulated to reduce the risk of AMR development [4,5].

Conclusion

Tackling disease challenges in domestic animals and wildlife is a complex but critical task that requires a multifaceted approach. The interconnectedness of animal, human, and environmental health underscores the importance of the One Health framework in disease prevention and control. Through robust surveillance, biosecurity measures, vaccination programs, and international collaboration, we can reduce the burden of infectious diseases, protect biodiversity, and safeguard public health. The future of disease management lies in integrated, proactive strategies that address the root causes of disease emergence and promote health across all species.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1. Roumbedakis, Katina, Marina N. Alexandre, Jose A. Puch and Carlos Rosas, et al. "Short and long-term effects of anesthesia in maya (cephalopoda, octopodidae) juveniles." Front physiol 11 (2020): 697.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

2. Polese, Gianluca, William Winlow and Anna Di Cosmo. "Dose-dependent effects of the clinical anesthetic isoflurane on vulgaris: A contribution to cephalopod welfare." J Aquat Anim Health 26(2014): 285-294.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

3. Butler-Struben, Hanna M., Samantha M. Brophy, Nasira A. Johnson and Robyn J. Crook, et al. "In vivo recording of neural and behavioral correlates of anesthesia induction, reversal and euthanasia in cephalopod molluscs." Front physiol 9 (2018): 109.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

4. Dingerkus, G. and E. D. Santoro. "Cornea regeneration in the Pacific giant octopus, dofleini and the common octopus, O. vulgaris." Experientia 37 (1981): 368-369.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at

5. Harrison, F. M. and A. W. Martin. "Excretion in the cephalopod, dofleini." J Exp Biol 42 (1965): 71-98.

Google Scholar        Cross Ref                Indexed at