GET THE APP

Journal of General Practice

Journal of General Practice

ISSN: 2329-9126

Open Access

Feasibility of a Decision Support Tool for the Pharmacological Management of Depression

Abstract

Stephen Kellett1,2*, Melanie Simmonds-Buckley1,2, Mike Seneviratne1, Katherine Morgan2, Mark Boon3 and Ian Seymour4

Objective: The accurate prescription of antidepressants is technically complex and difficult to achieve. This project therefore sought to evaluate the feasibility of integrating an evidence-based decision support tool (Predictix) into General Practice. Methods: This was a real-world mixed methods evaluation in N=2 General Practices of the experiences of patients (n=24), General Practitioners (GPs; n=4) and Predictix administrators (n=2). Suitable patients were assessed using Predictix and this produced a recommendation for the likely most efficacious anti-depressant. Two patient study groups were created (a) antidepressant recommended by Predictix and (b) a GP clinical opinion override group. Both groups of patients were followed up at 12-weeks. The PHQ-9 was embedded in the Predictix assessment, and the measure was recompleted at 12-weeks follow-up. Qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs, patients and administrators and a reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) conducted. Results: It took 20-minutes to administer Predictix and then 3-days for the prescription to be issued. N=19 (88%) received a Predictix selected antidepressant (2 participants dropped out during the Predictix assessment), of whom 8/19 recovered. The N=3 (14%) in the GP override group all recovered. The common qualitative themes across GPs, patients and administrators were managing expectations, individualized care and burden. Conclusion: Whilst decision support tools have the potential for increasing prescribing accuracy for antidepressants, practical and psychological barriers to implementation need to be identified and resolved.

PDF

Share this article

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 1047

Journal of General Practice received 1047 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of General Practice peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward