GET THE APP

..

Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics

ISSN: 2155-6180

Open Access

Comparisons of Four Discrete Distributions in Count Regressions Using Elders? Missing Teeth Data

Abstract

Ying Liu and Kesheng Wang

Objectives: This present study aimed to select the best count distributions for missing teeth in elders and to investigate the relationship between missing teeth and the predictors.

Materials and methods: Data were extracted from the biennial survey of 2015-2016 the U. S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Only adults aged 60 years or over who completed oral health examination and demographics interview were included. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate the basic information of this studied population. The performances of four different count regression models (Poisson regression, negative binomial regression with linear variance function (NB1), negative binomial regression with quadratic variance function (NB2), and zero-inflated negative binomial regression) were compared through different approaches including the values of model fit test statistics such as Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), the magnitude of standard errors and a visual graph on the performances of fitted models.

Results: The disparities on missing teeth existed in old adults by poverty and educational level and race/ethnicity. More missing teeth were found in participants who are Blacks (mean=13.89), with less education (?¯?»?¿?¢?????¯?»?¿?¢????<12years) (mean: 13.11). Significance of t-test for “α”  indicated that Poisson distribution is not appropriate for missing teeth due to overdispersion. NB1 is the best model with the smallest AIC and BIC and the smallest standard errors of parameter estimates compared to other three candidate models.

Conclusion: The negative binomial distribution with linear variance function is the best distribution. Due to the fact of missing teeth which ranged from 0 to 28, the caution should be given when we interpreted the fitted model using NB1 as the missing teeth are close to 0 and 28.

PDF

Share this article

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2450

Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics received 2450 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward