GET THE APP

Unlocking the Secrets of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Insights from Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers
..

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis

ISSN: 2155-9929

Open Access

Mini Review - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 3

Unlocking the Secrets of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Insights from Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers

Eva Campbell*
*Correspondence: Eva Campbell, Department of Neurosurgery, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital (HUAV), 25198 Lleida, Spain, Email:
Department of Neurosurgery, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital (HUAV), 25198 Lleida, Spain

Received: 01-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. jmbd-23-106342; Editor assigned: 03-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. P-106342; Reviewed: 15-Jun-2023, QC No. Q-106342; Revised: 21-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. R-106342; Published: 28-Jun-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2155-9929.2023.14.579
Citation: Campbell, Eva. “Unlocking the Secrets of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Insights from Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers.” J Mol Biomark Diagn 14 (2023): 579.
Copyright: © 2023 Campbell E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating the need for reliable diagnostic tools and accurate prognostication methods. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the potential of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) biomarkers to provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke. This abstract highlights the emerging research surrounding CSF biomarkers and their role in unlocking the secrets of acute ischemic stroke. By analyzing CSF samples, researchers have identified a variety of biomarkers that reflect different aspects of stroke pathophysiology, including inflammation, oxidative stress, neuronal injury, and blood-brain barrier disruption.

CSF biomarkers such as S100B, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE), and Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) have shown promise in aiding the early diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, enabling rapid intervention and potentially improving patient outcomes. These biomarkers can help differentiate ischemic stroke from other stroke mimics and provide information on stroke severity and the extent of brain damage. Moreover, CSF biomarkers have demonstrated prognostic value in acute ischemic stroke, allowing clinicians to predict patient outcomes, assess the risk of complications, and guide treatment decisions. Markers such as CSF lactate, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and glial markers have been associated with worse functional outcomes, increased mortality, and the development of secondary complications, aiding in the identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from aggressive management strategies.

Keywords

Acute ischemic stroke • Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers • Blood-brain barrier disruption • Glial fibrillary acidic protein • Neuron-specific enolase

Introduction

Stroke is a clinical disorder characterized as an unexpected loss of neurological capability because of a disturbance in cerebral blood stream and is a main source of disability Stroke can be ischemic or hemorrhagic. Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) represents by far most (60-80%) of stroke frequency. Solid proof shows that early finding and the board in patients with AIS are foremost in further developing endurance and recuperating usefulness. Speedy and generally cheap atomic biomarkers have demonstrated to be significant in the administration of specific sicknesses, for example, troponin use in myocardial localized necrosis or HbA1c in hyperglycemia and diabetes [1]. To this end, recognizing AIS biomarkers to precisely analyze continuous or looming mind ischemia or localized necrosis and to foresee results would be progressive in directing clinical navigation, further developing endurance, and restricting disability. Acute ischemic stroke is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Timely diagnosis and accurate prognostication are crucial for effective management and intervention strategies. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as neuroimaging techniques and clinical assessments, have limitations in providing comprehensive information about the underlying pathophysiology and predicting patient outcomes. Therefore, there is a growing interest in exploring the potential of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) biomarkers as a valuable tool for unlocking the secrets of acute ischemic stroke [2].

Literature Review

Acute ischemic stroke is a devastating condition characterized by the sudden disruption of blood flow to the brain, resulting in neuronal injury and potential long-term disability. Rapid and accurate diagnoses as well as prognostication are essential for optimizing patient outcomes and guiding treatment strategies. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the potential of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) biomarkers to provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of acute ischemic stroke. The identification and analysis of CSF biomarkers have emerged as a promising avenue for unlocking the secrets of acute ischemic stroke. These biomarkers reflect specific molecular processes occurring in the central nervous system and can provide valuable information about stroke severity, prognosis, and treatment response. Numerous studies have investigated various CSF biomarkers and their association with acute ischemic stroke [3].

One key area of research involves markers of inflammation within the CSF. Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α), have been observed in the CSF of acute ischemic stroke patients. These markers suggest an activation of the inflammatory response following stroke, contributing to tissue damage and exacerbating neuronal injury. Additionally, elevated levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in CSF have been linked to worse clinical outcomes and increased risk of complications. Markers of neuronal injury have also been extensively studied in the context of acute ischemic stroke. Biomarkers such as S100B, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), and Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) have shown promise in reflecting the extent of neuronal damage [4].

Increased levels of these biomarkers in CSF have been associated with larger infarct volumes, more severe stroke symptoms, and worse functional outcomes. Furthermore, the presence of these neuronal injury markers early after stroke onset can aid in the early diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and differentiation from other stroke mimics. Blood-brain barrier disruption is a key event in acute ischemic stroke pathophysiology. Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs), particularly MMP-9, have been investigated as potential CSF biomarkers indicative of bloodbrain barrier integrity [5]. Elevated MMP-9 levels in CSF have been linked to increased blood-brain barrier permeability and associated with larger infarct volumes and worse clinical outcomes.

Discussion

The analysis of CSF biomarkers offers unique insights into the complex molecular processes occurring in the central nervous system during acute ischemic stroke. Various biomarkers reflecting different aspects of stroke pathophysiology have been identified. Inflammation markers, such as interleukins and C-Reactive Protein (CRP), provide information about the inflammatory response following stroke and its potential contribution to tissue damage. Markers of oxidative stress, including Malondialdehyde (MDA) and Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), shed light on the role of oxidative damage in stroke progression. Furthermore, CSF biomarkers associated with neuronal injury, such as S100B, NSE, and GFAP, offer valuable insights into the extent of neuronal damage and can aid in the early diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke [6]. These biomarkers have shown promise in differentiating stroke from stroke mimics and other neurological conditions. Additionally, markers of blood-brain barrier disruption, such as MMPs, provide information on the integrity of the cerebral vasculature and its association with stroke severity. CSF biomarkers also play a crucial role in prognostication. Elevated levels of lactate, IL-6, and glial markers have been associated with worse functional outcomes, increased mortality, and the development of secondary complications. Identifying high-risk patients early on can help guide treatment decisions and facilitate the implementation of aggressive management strategies [7].

Conclusion

The study of CSF biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke has the potential to revolutionize the field by providing valuable insights into stroke pathophysiology, aiding in early diagnosis, and enabling accurate prognostication. These biomarkers offer a comprehensive view of the molecular changes occurring in the central nervous system during stroke and can guide personalized treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. However, several challenges need to be addressed before CSF biomarkers can be widely implemented in clinical practice. Standardized measurement techniques, validation studies, and the establishment of reference ranges are necessary to ensure reliable and consistent results across different laboratories. Moreover, ethical considerations regarding invasive CSF sampling and the development of more accessible biomarker assays should be taken into account. Despite these challenges, the potential of CSF biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke is promising. Continued research efforts and collaborations are needed to further elucidate the role of these biomarkers, refine their clinical utility, and translate these findings into practical applications that can benefit stroke patients. Unlocking the secrets of acute ischemic stroke through CSF biomarkers represents an exciting frontier in stroke research and holds significant potential for advancing the field of stroke management and care.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest by author.

References

  1. Chugh, Chandril. "Acute ischemic stroke: Management approach." Indian J Crit Care Med 23 (2019): S140.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Petty, Kate, Brian P. Lemkuil and Brian Gierl. "Acute ischemic stroke." Anesthesiol Clin 39 (2021): 113-125.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Saver, Jeffrey L. "Time is brain—quantified." Stroke 37 (2006): 263-266.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Montellano, Felipe A., Kathrin Ungethüm, Laura Ramiro and Aliona Nacu, et al. "Role of blood-based biomarkers in ischemic stroke prognosis: A systematic review." Stroke 52 (2021): 543-551.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Jeon, Sang-Beom, Younsuck Koh, H. Alex Cho and Kiwon Lee. "Critical care for patients with massive ischemic stroke." J Stroke 16 (2014): 146.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Lai, Yun-Ju, Sandra K. Hanneman, Rebecca L. Casarez and Jing Wang, et al. "Blood biomarkers for physical recovery in ischemic stroke: A systematic review." Am J Transl Res 11 (2019): 4603.
  12. Google Scholar

  13. Prakapenia, Alexandra, Kristian Barlinn, Lars-Peder Pallesen and Anne Köhler, et al. "Low diagnostic yield of routine cerebrospinal fluid analysis in juvenile stroke." Front Neurol 9 (2018): 694.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 2054

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis received 2054 citations as per Google Scholar report

Molecular Biomarkers & Diagnosis peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward