GET THE APP

The Role of Media in Shaping Legitimacy Perception
..

Global Journal of Technology and Optimization

ISSN: 2229-8711

Open Access

Commentary - (2023) Volume 14, Issue 3

The Role of Media in Shaping Legitimacy Perception

Joanna Akin*
*Correspondence: Joanna Akin, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, 8 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TN, UK, Email:
Department of Economics, University of Bristol, 8 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TN, UK

Received: 03-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. gjto-23-109917; Editor assigned: 05-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. P-109917; Reviewed: 17-Jun-2023, QC No. Q-109917; Revised: 22-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. R-109917; Published: 29-Jun-2023 , DOI: 10.37421/2229-8711.2023.14.329
Citation: Akin, Joanna. “The Role of Media in Shaping Legitimacy Perception.” Global J Technol Optim 14 (2023): 329.
Copyright: © 2023 Akin J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Introduction

The modern media landscape has a profound impact on how individuals perceive the legitimacy of various entities, whether they are governments, organizations or even social movements. The media's ability to influence public opinion and shape legitimacy perception cannot be understated. In this age of information overflow, the media serves as both a gatekeeper and a disseminator of information, playing a pivotal role in shaping public attitudes and beliefs about legitimacy. Legitimacy refers to the rightful authority and acceptance of an entity's actions, decisions and power by a group of people. It is a complex interplay of legality, morality and public opinion. Legitimacy perception is essentially how the public perceives the fairness, justifiability and authenticity of the actions taken by a government, organization, or other entities [1].

The media serves as a conduit through which information flows from various sources to the public. It plays a key role in shaping public perception by determining which stories are highlighted, how they are framed and the context in which they are presented. Media outlets have the power to set agendas, influence discussions and even alter the emphasis placed on different aspects of a story. As a result, the media can significantly impact how legitimacy is perceived. Agenda setting is the process by which the media influences what topics are considered important by the public. Through repeated coverage and emphasis, the media can highlight certain issues, making them appear more significant than others. Framing, on the other hand, involves presenting a particular angle or perspective on a story, which can shape how audiences interpret events. Both agenda setting and framing can impact the legitimacy perception of different entities.

Description

Media bias, whether real or perceived, can sway public opinion and legitimacy perception. Bias can manifest in various forms, such as political bias, sensationalism, or selective reporting. When the media consistently portrays an entity in a positive or negative light, it can influence how the public views its legitimacy. Biased reporting can undermine trust in institutions and lead to the erosion of legitimacy. The rise of social media has further amplified the media's influence on legitimacy perception. Social platforms provide a space for individuals to share, discuss and debate various issues. However, the fastpaced and often unregulated nature of social media can lead to the spread of misinformation and the formation of echo chambers, where individuals are exposed only to perspectives that align with their existing beliefs. This can polarize opinions and impact how legitimacy is perceived [2].

The proliferation of fake news and disinformation poses a significant challenge to the media's role in shaping legitimacy perception. Misleading information can distort public understanding and lead to incorrect judgments about the legitimacy of entities. Media literacy education and fact-checking initiatives are crucial in promoting a more informed public discourse and accurate legitimacy perception. In a world where media plays such a central role in shaping legitimacy perception, individuals must adopt a thoughtful and critical approach to the information they consume. Relying on a single news source can lead to a skewed perspective. Seek information from a variety of reputable sources with different viewpoints to gain a more balanced understanding of events and entities [3].

Educate yourself and others about media literacy. Understand how to identify credible sources, recognize bias and evaluate the quality of information presented. Fact-checking websites can be valuable tools in verifying the accuracy of claims. Be attentive to how stories are framed and the emphasis placed on certain aspects. Ask yourself why a particular angle is being presented and whether it might be influencing your perception of legitimacy. Engage in respectful discussions with others who hold differing opinions. Exposing yourself to diverse viewpoints can help you develop a more nuanced understanding of legitimacy and broaden your perspective [4].

Media outlets often use emotional appeals to capture attention. While emotions are important, be cautious of information that attempts to evoke strong emotional responses without providing sufficient factual context. Before sharing information on social media or with others, take a moment to verify its accuracy. Misinformation spreads quickly and can contribute to skewed perceptions of legitimacy. Understand that media outlets can have biases, whether overt or subtle. Familiarize yourself with the potential biases of different sources so you can approach their coverage with a discerning eye.

While online platforms provide a wealth of information, don't overlook the value of traditional forms of media, such as newspapers and magazines. These sources often undergo more rigorous editorial processes. Support media outlets that adhere to ethical standards and responsible reporting. Reward quality journalism that seeks to provide accurate and balanced information. Educate others, especially young people, about the importance of critical thinking when consuming media. Teaching and lytical skills empowers individuals to assess information independently [5].

Conclusion

The media wields significant power in shaping how individuals perceive the legitimacy of governments, organizations and other entities. Through agenda setting, framing and the dissemination of information, the media influences public opinion and shapes the narratives surrounding legitimacy. As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative to address the challenges posed by biases and disinformation in order to maintain a well-informed and critically thinking society. By fostering media literacy and promoting responsible journalism, we can ensure that the media plays a positive role in shaping legitimacy perception in the modern world.

The media's role in shaping legitimacy perception is undeniable, but its impact can be both positive and negative. By approaching media consumption with a critical mindset, individuals can counter the influence of biased reporting and disinformation, leading to a more informed and accurate understanding of legitimacy. In an era where information is easily accessible and shared, the responsibility to be discerning consumers of media falls on each of us. By doing so, we contribute to a more transparent and trustworthy public discourse, ultimately fostering a healthier democracy and society.

Acknowledgement

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares there is no conflict of interest associated with this manuscript.

References

  1. Hennock, E. P. "Vaccination policy against smallpox, 1835-1914: A comparison of England with Prussia and Imperial Germany."Soc Hist Med11 (1998): 49-71.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Yamamoto, Mariko, Mayllynne T. Lopez and Lynette A. Hart. "Registrations of assistance dogs in California for identification tags: 1999–2012."PLoS One10 (2015): e0132820.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Jaidka, Kokil. "Cross-platform-and subgroup-differences in the well-being effects of Twitter, Instagram and Facebook in the United States."Sci Rep 12 (2022): 3271.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Rajabali, Alefiyah, Omer Moin, Amna S. Ansari and Mohammad R. Khanani, et al. "Communicable disease among displaced Afghans: Refuge without shelter."Nat Rev Microbiol 7 (2009): 609-614.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Masud, Md Abdul Kaium, Md Harun Ur Rashid, Tehmina Khan and Seong Mi Bae, et al. "Organizational strategy and corporate social responsibility: The mediating effect of triple bottom line."Int J Environ Res Public Health 16 (2019): 4559.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Google Scholar citation report
Citations: 664

Global Journal of Technology and Optimization received 664 citations as per Google Scholar report

Global Journal of Technology and Optimization peer review process verified at publons

Indexed In

 
arrow_upward arrow_upward