The Reaction Relationship between Bog Vegetation and Hydrology Can Be Quantitatively Examined Using the Coordination Model

Bolin Fu^*
*Correspondence: Bolin Fu, Department of Hydrology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541000, China, Email:

Description

One of the areas of interest in environmental research is how bog vegetation and hydrology work together. This paper interestingly constructed a spatio-fleeting checking model for swamp vegetation and hydrology change involving remote detecting procedures using the Honghe National Nature Reserve as the review area [1]. The GEE stage and LandTrendr calculation were incorporated into this model. From 1985 to 2019, we observed the worldly and spatial aspects of the aggravation and reconstruction of swamp vegetation and hydrology. To investigate the global and spatially significant development of swamp vegetation and hydrology over the past 35 years, the magnitude and duration were chosen [2]. A creative coupling coordination model of bog vegetation and hydrology was developed concurrently in order to quantitatively assess the link between vegetation misfortune and reclamation and hydrologic change. The exchange entropy model was used to investigate the awareness of the coupling connection between swamp vegetation and hydrology, and the exchange rate was used to resolve the influencing variables of bog vegetation change [3].

The results demonstrated that this method can effectively monitor the spatiotemporal development of swamp vegetation and hydrology by incorporating time series Landsat series images and the LandTrendr calculation. The precision rates of 83.68% and 85.78%, respectively, indicate that this strategy is capable of doing so. The bog vegetation in the area under review has typically shown a pattern of recovery over the past 35 years, with a recovery period of less than 20 years [4]. The disturbance period is less than 20 years, and the vegetation aggravation is divided and minimized. The relationship between changes in hydrology and swamp vegetation was examined with the help of the quadratic relapse model. Wetland hydrology and vegetation changes have a crucial connection, as demonstrated by the R2 values of 0.885 and 0.811, respectively, for vegetation misfortune and rebuilding and hydrology. From 1985 to 2019, the relationship between swamp vegetation and hydrology was lopsided, but there was more coupling between vegetation problems and changes in hydrology.

It was demonstrated that hydrological changes are the driving factor for bog vegetation misfortune and reclamation because the exchange entropy from hydrological changes to vegetation damage and rebuilding is fundamentally larger than the exchange entropy from bog vegetation damage and reclamation to hydrological changes [5].

Wetland is possibly one of the most economically important and useful environments on the planet. Wetland corruption will seriously hinder

humanity's progress because it will degrade the biological strength of regular land. As a result, unique wetlands observations and examinations play a significant role in determining the evolution, reclamation, and reproduction of the natural climate. According to Junk's report, the global lack of wetlands ranges from 30 percent to 90 percent. Worldwide wetland deficiency was 64%- 71% in the twentieth century, and inland wetland deficiency was greater than beachfront wetland deficiency. The deficiency of regular wetlands remains in a state of perpetual corruption in the 21st century, and the rate of corruption is increasing, primarily manifested as the disappearance of streams, shrinking lakes, shrinking swamps, eutrophication or salinization of water quality, decline in natural species, and harm to biodiversity.

Wetland vegetation networks and hydrology are the main components of the wetland biological system, according to research. Wetland vegetation is an immediate indicator of the strength of the wetland environment, and its spatial conveyance is largely influenced by wetland hydrological conditions. Bog hydrology, on the other hand, is the really main thrust that keeps up with the turn of events and decline of the wetland. As a result, it is critical to monitor the global and spatially significant changes in bog vegetation and hydrology over time in order to provide a logical and solid reference for the management of wetland preserves.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

None

References

1. Higgins, Steven I., David M. Richardson, and Richard M. Cowling. "Modeling invasive plant spread: The role of plant‐environment interactions and model structure." Ecol 77 (1996): 2043-2054.

 Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

2. Reich, Peter B. "The world‐wide ‘fast–slow’plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto." J Ecol 102 (2014): 275-301.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

3. Westoby, Mark, Daniel S. Falster and Ian J. Wright. "Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species." Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst (2002): 125-159.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

4. Hoosbeek, Marcel R and Ray B. Bryant. "Towards the quantitative modeling of pedogenesis-a review." Geoderma 55 (1992): 183-210.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

5. Milla, Ruben, Colin P. Osborne, Martin M. Turcotte, and Cyrille Violle. "Plant domestication through an ecological lens." Trends Ecol Evol 30 (2015): 463-469.

Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at