GET THE APP

The Difficulties Endured by Cases with Low Back Pain
..

Research and Reports in Medical Sciences

ISSN: 2952-8127

Open Access

Editorial - (2022) Volume 6, Issue 3

The Difficulties Endured by Cases with Low Back Pain

Jeongik Kim*
*Correspondence: Jeongik Kim, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea, Email:
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea

Received: 02-May-2022, Manuscript No. rrms-22-70248; Editor assigned: 04-May-2022, Pre QC No. P-70248; Reviewed: 07-May-2022, QC No. Q-70248; Revised: 13-May-2022, Manuscript No. R-70248; Published: 19-May-2022 , DOI: 10.37421/2952-8127.2022.6.76
Citation: Kim, Jeongik. “The Difficulties Endured by Cases with Low Back Pain.” Res Rep Med Sci 6 (2022): 76.
Copyright: © 2022 Kim J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Editorial

Low Reverse pain (LBP) is a major transnational public health concern with significant social, occupational and profitable impacts. Indeed, it is the pathology that generates the topmost number of times lived with a disability in the world. France is no exception to this intimidating fact, as 84 of the French population will suffer from LBP during their continuance, including 6 to 8 who will develop regularity (symptoms present for further than 6 months). In profitable terms, the costs of this pathology are estimated at 900 million euros per time. also, it is the cases who come habitual that dodge the largest share of the charges also, one out of every five cases of LBP results in a work cessation, representing 30 of all work stoppages of further than 6 months. It is therefore the first cause of rejection from working life before the age of 45 [1].

Institutions now contend on the use of physical exertion for the treatment of this pathology. They also mention the need for multidisciplinary operation when this is necessary, without specifying the modalities. Some sanitarium programs formerly incorporate this approach. The ideal of this study is to identify the difficulties encountered by cases with habitual LBP in order to optimize the proposed support and to define the different remedial conduct that can be considered. It also focuses on the problems of cases with subacute or intermittent LBP, in order to ameliorate their operation and avoid their transition to regularity [2].

Quantitative check in a activity practice This check was carried out by means of an anonymous tone- administered paper questionnaire of 25 questions, to be placed in a ballot box. Addition criteria were to have habitual LBP (symptoms present for further than 3 months), subacute LBP (symptoms present for 1 to 3 months), or intermittent LBP (symptoms absent or present for lower than 1 month, but presence of at least 2 occurrences in the once 12 months). The rejection criteria weren't having LBP or being in the acute phase (symptoms present for lower than 1 month) [3]

The first 4 questions were used to elect the target population of cases with habitual LBP and subacute or intermittent LBP and to separate these two orders for analysis. also, 16 problems affecting cases with LBP, linked in a reference study in the United Kingdom conducted by M [4]. Reid, were to be estimated from 0 to 4 according to a Likert scale (0 I do not find myself at each without this problem 4 it is a veritably important problem for me) A mean score (MS) was assigned to each item and gave a ranking in order of significance. A multiple- choice questionnaire (MCQ) was used to determine whether the repliers could identify themselves with the problems listed, and a short openconcluded question (SOQ) allowed them to mention other difficulties. The questionnaire ended with 3 profile questions (age, gender, socio- professional order) [5].

Conclusion

Despite its limitations, this check verified the numerous areas of life altered by habitual LBP in France and the difficulty in supporting people suffering from this pathology. Faced with this, we've seen that the possible remedial conduct are multitudinous, but that they need to be substantiated, attendant and carried out by an interdisciplinary platoon. Since these difficulties are analogous to those formerly linked in the United Kingdom, it would be intriguing to continue this type of study in the countries with a high frequence of this pathology, in order to consider reflection and coordinated action between them. Eventually, it would be applicable to establish early support for cases with subacute or intermittent LBP to avoid the transition to regularity and its multiple consequences.

Acknowledgements

Numerous thanks to the cases who answered the questionnaires via the Internet or at the activity office. Thank you also to the colorful experts who gave their time to change with applicability on this subject. Eventually, a special study for the tutoring platoon of the D.A.S. TPE of the University of Geneva.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Cherkin, Daniel C., Richard A. Deyo, Kimberly Wheeler and Marcia A. Ciol. "Physician variation in diagnostic testing for low back pain. Who you see is what you get." A&R: Offic J Am College Rheumatol 37 (1994): 15-22.
  2. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  3. Pengel, Liset HM, Robert D. Herbert, Chris G. Maher and Kathryn M. Refshauge. "Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis." BMJ 327 (2003): 323.

    Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  4. Croft, Peter R., Gary J. Macfarlane, Elaine Thomas and Alan J. Silman. "Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study." BMJ 316 (1998): 1356.
  5. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  6. Van Den Hoogen, Hans J.M., Bart W. Koes, Jacques Th M. Van Eijk and Walter Devillé. "On the course of low back pain in general practice: A one year follow up study." ARD 57 (1998): 13-19.

    Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

  7. Pincus, Tamar, A. Kim Burton, Steve Vogel and Andy P. Field. "A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain." Spine 27 (2002): 109-120.
  8. Google Scholar, Indexed at, Crossref

arrow_upward arrow_upward