Brief Report - (2023) Volume 17, Issue 3
Received: 20-May-2023, Manuscript No. glta-23-105746;
Editor assigned: 22-May-2023, Pre QC No. P-105746;
Reviewed: 12-Jun-2023, QC No. Q-105746;
Revised: 17-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. R-105746;
Published:
24-Jun-2023
, DOI: 10.37421/1736-4337.2023.17.389
Citation: Jannesari, Mohsen. “Statistics Entropic: In the Fields of Knowledge Extraction and Machine Learning, the Concept, Estimation and Application.” J Generalized Lie Theory App 17 (2023): 389.
Copyright: © 2023 Jannesari M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Due to the unprecedented increase in data volume and quality, machine learning and knowledge extraction methods have been in high demand. However, given that a significant amount of information and knowledge is contained within the non-ordinal realm of data, difficulties arise amid the growing complexity of the data. Researchers came up with a lot of machine learning and knowledge extraction strategies to deal with various domain-specific issues. To portray and extricate data from non-ordinal information, every one of the created strategies highlighted the subject of Data Hypothesis, laid out following Shannon's milestone paper in 1948. This article audits ongoing advancements in entropic measurements, including assessment of Shannon's entropy and its functionals (like common data and Kullback-Leibler dissimilarity), ideas of entropic premise, summed up Shannon's entropy (and its functionals) and their assessments and expected applications in AI and information extraction. With the knowledge of the most recent developments in entropic statistics, researchers can improve the performance of existing machine learning and knowledge extraction techniques or create new strategies to address upcoming domain-specific challenges.
A collection of statistical techniques known as entropic statistics uses Shannon's entropy and its generalized functionals to describe data from nonordinal spaces. Statistics involving Shannon's entropy (entropy) and mutual information, Kullback–Leibler divergence, entropic basis and diversity index and generalized Shannon's entropy (GSE) and Generalized Mutual Information (GMI) are examples of such procedures. Information theory and statistics meet in the field of entropic statistics. Entropic measurements amounts are additionally alluded as data hypothetical amounts. There are two general information types ordinal and non-ordinal (ostensible). Data that have an inherent numerical scale are called ordinal data. For instance, a set of ordinal daily high temperatures. Random variables, which map outcomes from sample space to real numbers, are used to generate ordinal data. Classical concepts like moments (mean, variance, covariance, etc.) for ordinal data and characteristics functions are potent inducers of a variety of statistical techniques, including but not limited to ANOVA and regression analysis [1].
Non-ordinal information are information without an innate mathematical scale. A set of data, for instance, without an inherent numerical scale is a subset of the names of human genes. Random elements (which map outcomes from sample space to alphabet) are used to generate non-ordinal data. The definition of random variable does not define the concept because there is no inherent numerical scale. As a result, ordinal scale-related statistical concepts like mean, variance, covariance and characteristic functions no longer exist. Consider, for instance, the aforementioned data on the names of human genes; What is the data's mean or variance? In practice, researchers must measure the level of dependence in non-ordinal joint space between gene types and genetic phenotype in order to study the functionalities of the gene, but such questions cannot be answered because the concepts of mean and variance do not exist. Ordinal data would make use of covariance and the methods it generates. However, in such non-ordinal space, the idea of covariance no longer applies. Moreover, all deep rooted factual strategies that require ordinal scale (e.g., relapse and ANOVA) can't be straightforwardly applied any longer [2].
There are a number of different names for non-ordinal data, including nominal data, qualitative data and categorical data. Combining ordinal and non-ordinal data in a dataset is common. On such a dataset, coded (dummy) variables are frequently used. Dummy variables, on the other hand, are the same as separating the mixed dataset according to the classes in non-ordinal variables to create multiple purely ordinal subsets and then applying ordinal methods, such as regression analysis, one at a time, to the induced subsets. Tragically, this approach at times could be unfeasible as a result of the scourge of dimensionality, especially when there are such a large number of all out factors or when some straight out factor has such a large number of classifications (classes). Data from non-ordinal space can be effectively characterized using entropic statistics. In the mean time, it is fundamental to understand that non-ordinal data is innately challenging to recognize because of its non-ordinal and stage invariant nature. The purpose of this survey article is to provide an in-depth analysis of the most recent developments in entropic statistics, including the estimation of traditional entropic concepts, newly developed entropic statistics quantities and their potential applications in machine learning and knowledge extraction [3].
This article begins by outlining the difficulties presented by non-ordinal data and then introduces the idea of entropic statistics. The estimation for traditional entropic quantities is then reviewed in this article. These exemplary entropic ideas, including Shannon's entropy, MI and KL, are generally utilized in laid out AI and information extraction strategies. The overwhelming majority of the laid out strategies use module assessment, which is calculation proficient yet with a huge inclination. By adopting a different estimation method or adding theoretical guarantee to the existing methods, the surveyed various estimation methods would assist researchers in potentially improving their performance. The estimation and applications of recently developed entropic statistics concepts are also reviewed. Non-ordinal information can be characterized in new ways thanks to these new ideas, which not only give researchers a fresh perspective on how to estimate existing quantities but also support additional aspects [4].
With their induced entropic basis and entropic moments, the generalized Simpson's diversity indices, in particular, have significant theoretical and practical potential to either modify existing machine learning and knowledge extraction techniques or develop new ones that take into account difficulties specific to a particular domain. Further, this article gives a few instances of how to apply the overviewed results to a portion of the current strategies, including an irregular woods model, fourteen component determination techniques and a catchphrase extraction model. It is important to note that the survey's objective is not to assert that some estimation methods are superior to others, but rather to provide a comprehensive list of recent advancements in entropic statistics research. In particular, albeit an assessor with a quicker rotting predisposition appears to be hypothetically liked, it has a more drawn out computation time even with the helpful R capabilities, especially when various layers of folding blade (bootstrap) are involved. The preference for estimation varies from case to case—some individuals may prefer an estimator with a smaller bias, while others may require a compromise between the two [5].
In conclusion, the article focuses on non-parametric estimation, whereas parametric estimation is more effective when the chosen model corresponds to the reality of the domain. In conclusion, one should always determine whether a new estimation method meets the requirements.
None.
No conflict of interest.
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at
