GET THE APP

Review of The Efficacy of Face Masks And Respirators Against Coronaviruses
..

Journal of Advanced Practices in Nursing

ISSN: 2573-0347

Open Access

Short Communication - (2021) Volume 6, Issue 5

Review of The Efficacy of Face Masks And Respirators Against Coronaviruses

Vasudeva*
*Correspondence: Vasudeva, Department of Medical Statistics, Manipal University, India, Email:
Department of Medical Statistics, Manipal University, India

Received: 20-Apr-2021 Published: 19-May-2021 , DOI: 10.37421/2573-0347.2021.6.202
Citation: Vasudeva. “Review of The Efficacy of Face Masks And Respirators Against Coronaviruses.” Adv Practice Nurs 6 (2021): 202
Copyright: © 2021 Vasudeva .This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permitsunrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The study suggests that community mask use by well people could be beneficial, particularly for COVID-19, where transmission may be pre-symptomatic. The studies of masks as source control also suggest a benefit, and may be important during the COVID-19 pandemic in universal community face mask use as well as in health care settings.

Abstract

The study suggests that community mask use by well people could be beneficial, particularly for COVID-19, where transmission may be pre-symptomatic. The studies of masks as source control also suggest a benefit, and may be important during the COVID-19 pandemic in universal community face mask use as well as in health care settings.

Introduction

Background: The pandemic of COVID-19 is growing, and a shortage of masks and respirators has been reported globally. Policies of health organizations for healthcare workers are inconsistent, with a change in policy in the US for universal face mask use. The aim of this study was to review the evidence around the efficacy of masks and respirators for healthcare workers, sick patients and the general public.: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials on use of respiratory protection by workers, sick patients and community members was conducted. Articles were searched on Medline and Embase using key search terms.Results: A total of 19 randomised controlled trials were included in this study – 8 in community settings, 6 in healthcare settings and 5 as source control. Most of these randomised controlled trials used different interventions and outcome measures. In the community, masks appeared to be effective with and without hand hygiene, and both together are more protective. Randomised controlled trials in health care workers showed that respirators, if worn continually during a shift, were effective but not if worn intermittently. Medical masks were not effective, and cloth masks even less effective. When used by sick patients randomised controlled trials suggested protection of well contacts.

References

  1. 1. Lyk�Jensen HT, Jepsen RMHG, Spanager L, et al. "Assessing N urse Anaesthetists' N on�T echnical S kills in the operating room." Acta AnaesthesiologicaScandinavica 587 (2014): 794-801.
  2. 2. Malec, James F, Laurence Torsher C, et al . Wiegmann, Jacqueline J. Arnold,Dwight A. Brown, and Vaishali Phatak. "The mayo high performance teamworkscale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills."Simulation in Healthcare 2, 1 (2007): 4-10.
  3. 3. Manser, Tanja. "Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: areview of the literature." Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 53, 2 (2009): 143-151.
  4. 4. Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P. "The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliabilityand validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre."BMJ Quality & Safety 18, 2 (2009): 104-108
arrow_upward arrow_upward